Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
08.02.2001 - 14.02.2001
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-study, but the testarticle was not analyzed for identity, purity, composition or stability

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2001

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
NIH Publication No. 99-4494
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
[(1H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-1-yloxy)(dimethylamino)methylidene]dimethylazanium; tetrafluoroboranuide
Cas Number:
125700-67-6
Molecular formula:
C11H16BF4N5O
IUPAC Name:
[(1H-1,2,3-benzotriazol-1-yloxy)(dimethylamino)methylidene]dimethylazanium; tetrafluoroboranuide
Details on test material:
p.4 under identity of the tested chemical substances: the wrong "Benzotriazol-1-yl-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate"-name is listed for the CAS number 125700-67-6
p.74: The correct name (1H-Benzotriazolium, 1-[bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-, tetrafluoroborate(1-), 3-oxide (9CI) for CAS number 125700-67-6 is given.
however on
p. 84 The "uronium"-names (Benzotriazol-1-yl-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate) are used in the attached safety data sheet

Lot Number: 217152

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
total Number of animals:25,
age: 8-12 weeks,
weight: 18-25 g

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
DMSO
Concentration / amount:
0.5%, 5%, 10%
Challenge
Concentration / amount:
0.5%, 5%, 10%
No. of animals per dose:
5
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
DNCB

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethyl sulphoxide
Concentration:
0,1%
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
Mice were weighed on Days 1 and 6. Mice were treated on the dorsal surface of both ears, once per day on Days 1,2, and 3. A volume of 25 µl/ear was used. On day 6 the mice were injected i.v. with 20 µCi of ³H-thymidine in 250 µl of saline. Five hours later the mice were euthanized with CO2 and the draining auricular lymph nodes removed.
Positive control substance(s):
other: Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)
Statistics:
f-distribution using SYSTAT(version 9.01, SYSTAT, Inc.). A Dunnetts tesdt was used to determine the degree of significance from control means.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
stimulation index greater than 3 (5.91)

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: 10% - stimulation index 5.11, 5% - stimulation index 2.78, 0.5% - stimulation index 2.80, DNCB- stimulation index 5.91
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: 10% - 6338 (mean) 5% - 3454 (mean) 0.5% - 3476 (mean) DMSO- 1241 (mean) DNCB - 7334 (mean)

Any other information on results incl. tables

no significant changes were found with the body weights.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
valid study for classification
Executive summary:
In a skin sensitization study with TBTU (0.5, 5, 10%) in DMSO, female mouse (CBA) were tested in LLNA (using the method of NIH Publication No. 99-4494). TBTU was found to have induced a hypersensitive response in mice, at a concentration of 10% as measured by the proliferation of lymphocytes in the draining lymph nodes. Consequently, TBTU is considered to be a potential sensitizer.