Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Description of key information

log Pow – calculation based on structure and fragments (Lyman et al. and KOWWIN v1.68): 3.40-4.27 (avg = 4.05)
log Pow - calculated from weight-averaged log Koc value: 3.75
log Pow - calculated using KOWWIN v1.68 (weight-averaged value): 3.42

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
3.74
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

The key value for chemical safety assessment is derived from the various calculated log Pow values (average of all values 4.05, 3.42 and 3.75) for Alcohols, C9-11, ethoxylated (EO < 2.5) (CAS 68439-46-3).

The following types of calculations were applied:

1. a combination of calculations according to Lyman et al. (1990) and KOWWIN v1.68 (structures considered not further specified); the average of the overall range (log Pow 3.40 – 4.27), i.e. log Pow 4.05, was used in the calculation to derive the key value

2. based on weight-averaged log Koc values using the TGD equation for predominantly hydrophobic substances: log Koc = 0.81 log Pow + 0.10 thus log Pow = (log Koc – 0.10)/0.81 (2003 EU Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment Part III, Chapter 4, Section 4.3, pp 24 – 27)

3. based on EPIsuite v 4.10, KOWWIN v 1.68 log Pow values for (possible) individual constituents of the substance; a weighting based on normalized composition was applied to derive a log Pow value for the whole substance.

The key value for chemical safety assessment is an average of all 3 log Pow values (4.05, 3.42 and 3.75) obtained with the calculation and in the experiment.