Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Between 07 August 2012 and 30 August 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted to GLP and in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not effect the quality of the relevant results.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 bis (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Procedure)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
No analysis was carried out to determine the homogeneity, concentration or stability of the test item formulation. This exception is considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.
Test type:
fixed dose procedure
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Nonylphenol ethoxylate, sarcosine derivative
IUPAC Name:
Nonylphenol ethoxylate, sarcosine derivative
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
disodium 2-({2-hydroxy-3-[2-(4-nonylphenoxy)ethoxy]propyl}(methyl)amino)acetate 2-{[3-({1-chloro-3-[2-(4-nonylphenoxy)ethoxy]propan-2-yl}oxy)-2-hydroxypropyl](methyl)amino}acetate
EC Number:
616-248-3
Cas Number:
75627-31-5
Molecular formula:
UVCB not applicable
IUPAC Name:
disodium 2-({2-hydroxy-3-[2-(4-nonylphenoxy)ethoxy]propyl}(methyl)amino)acetate 2-{[3-({1-chloro-3-[2-(4-nonylphenoxy)ethoxy]propan-2-yl}oxy)-2-hydroxypropyl](methyl)amino}acetate
Test material form:
other: liquid
Details on test material:
Sponsor's identification: Nonylphenol ethoxylate, sarcosine derivative
CAS no. 75627-31-5
Description : pale yellow liquid
Batch number : 120229AAH
Purity : 81.7%
Date received : 06 June 2012
Expiry date : 28 February 2017
Storage conditions: room temperature in the dark
The integrity of supplied data relating to the identity, purity and stability of the test item is the responsibility of the Sponsor.
A Certificate of Analysis supplied by the Sponsor is given in Appendix 3 (Attachment 1).

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Female Wistar (RccHan™:WIST) strain rats were supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The females were nulliparous and non-pregnant. After an acclimatisation period of at least five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals were eight to twelve weeks of age. The bodyweight variation did not exceed ±20% of the bodyweight of the initially dosed animal.
The animals were housed in groups of up to four in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. With the exception of an overnight fast immediately before dosing and for approximately three to four hours after dosing, free access to mains drinking water and food (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analysed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that would reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25°C and 30 to 70% respectively. Any occasional deviations from these targets were considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
arachis oil
Details on oral exposure:
All animals were dosed once only by gavage using a metal cannula attached to a graduated syringe.
Doses:
Using available information on the toxicity of the test item, 2448 mg/kg was chosen as the starting dose.

Dose Level Concentration Dose Volume Number of Rats
(mg/kg) (mg/ml) (ml/kg) Female
2448* 244.8 10 1


In the absence of toxicity at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg, an additional group of animals was treated as follows:
Dose Level Concentration Dose Volume Number of Rats
(mg/kg) (mg/ml) (ml/kg) Female
2448* 244.8 10 4

* - Equivalent to 2000 mg active ingredient/kg bodyweight
No. of animals per sex per dose:
1 female at 2448 mg/kg
4 females at 2448 mg/kg
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
Using available information on the toxicity of the test item, 2448 mg/kg was chosen as the starting dose.
Dose Level(mg/kg) Concentration(mg/ml) Dose Volume(ml/kg) Number of Rats Female
2448* 244.8 10 1
In the absence of mortality at a dose level of 2448 mg/kg, an additional group of animals was treated as follows:
Dose Level(mg/kg) Concentration(mg/ml) Dose Volume(ml/kg) Number of Rats Female
2448* 244.8 10 4
A total of five animals were therefore treated at a dose level of 2448 mg/kg (equivalent to 2000 mg active ingredient/kg bodyweight) in the study.
All animals were dosed once only by gavage using a metal cannula attached to a graduated syringe. The volume administered to each animal was calculated according to its fasted bodyweight at the time of dosing.
Clinical observations were made ½, 1, 2, and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for fourteen days. Morbidity and mortality checks were made twice daily.
Individual bodyweights were recorded on Day 0 (the day of dosing) and on Days 7 and 14.
At the end of the observation period the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained.

* - Equivalent to 2000 mg active ingredient/kg bodyweight

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
act. ingr.
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limits not given in study report.
Mortality:
Individual mortality data are given in Table 1.
There were no deaths.
Clinical signs:
other: Individual clinical observations are given in Table 1. Hunched posture was noted during the day of dosing in the initial treated animal. There were no signs of systemic toxicity noted in the additional four treated animals.
Gross pathology:
Individual necropsy findings are given in Table 3.
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Evaluation of Data

The test item will be classified according to Annex 3 of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 420 "Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method" (adopted 17 December 2001).

Evaluation of data included identification of the number of animals that died during the study (or that were killed for humane reasons), and determination of the nature, severity, onset and duration of the toxic effects. If possible, the signs of evident toxicity were described. Evident toxicity refers to the toxic effects of sufficient severity that administration of the next higher dose level could result in development of severe signs of toxicity and probable mortality. Effects on bodyweights and abnormalities noted at necropsy were also identified.

Using the mortality data obtained, an estimate of the acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item was made.

Table 1              Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data

Dose Level mg/kg

Animal Number and Sex

Effects Noted After Dosing
(Hours)

Effects Noted During Period After Dosing
(Days)

½

1

2

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

2448Ä

1-0

Female

0

H

H

H

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-0

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-1

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-2

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-3

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Ä=     Equivalent to 2000 mg active ingredient/kg bodyweight

0=     No signs of systemic toxicity

H =      Hunched posture

Table 2              Individual Bodyweights and Bodyweight Changes

Dose Level mg/kg

Animal Number and Sex

Bodyweight (g) at Day

Bodyweight Gain (g) During Week

0

7

14

1

2

2448Ä

1-0 Female

158

172

187

14

15

2-0 Female

169

183

200

14

17

2-1 Female

171

197

205

26

8

2-2 Female

170

199

210

29

11

2-3 Female

168

196

212

28

16

Ä=     Equivalent to 2000 mg active ingredient/kg bodyweight

Table 3              Individual Necropsy Findings

Dose Level
mg/kg

Animal Number
and Sex

Time of Death

Macroscopic Observations

2448Ä

1-0 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

2-0 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

2-1 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

2-2 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

2-3 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

Ä=     Equivalent to 2000 mg active ingredient/kg bodyweight

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2448 mg/kg bodyweight (equivalent to 2000 mg active ingredient/kg bodyweight) (Globally Harmonised Classification System - Unclassified).
Executive summary:

Introduction. The study was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of the test item in the Wistar strain rat. The method was designed to be compatible with the following:

OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 420 "Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method" (adopted 17 December 2001)

Method B1 bis Acute Toxicity (Oral) of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008

Method. Following a sighting test at a dose level of 2448 mg/kg (equivalent to 2000 mg active ingredient/kg bodyweight), an additional four fasted female animals were given a single oral dose of test item, as a suspension in arachis oil BP, at a dose level of 2448 mg/kg bodyweight. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.

Mortality. There were no deaths.

Clinical Observations. Hunched posture was noted during the day of dosing in the initial treated animal. There were no signs of systemic toxicity noted in the additional four treated animals.

Bodyweight. All animals showed expected gains in bodyweight.

Necropsy. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Conclusion. The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2448 mg/kg bodyweight (equivalent to 2000 mg active ingredient/kg bodyweight) (Globally Harmonised Classification System-Unclassified).