Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 813-999-0 | CAS number: 59039-15-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- effects on growth of green algae
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 27 May 2020 to 03 July 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2006
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch number of test material: Lambiotte & Cie - 2003271010R
- Purity: 99.90%
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark under nitrogen - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: 100 mg/L
- Sampling method: Samples were taken from the control and the 100 mg/L test group from the bulk test preparation at 0 hours and from the pooled replicates at 72 hours for immediate quantitative analysis. A set of duplicate samples were taken at 0 and 72 hours and stored frozen for further analysis if necessary.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: immediate quantitative analysis - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
A nominal amount of test item (200 mg) was dissolved in culture medium and the volume adjusted to 2 liters to give a 100 mg/L stock. An aliquot (2 liters) of the stock solution and control were separately inoculated with algal suspension (7.8 mL) to give an initial nominal cell density of 5.00 x 103 cells/mL.
The stock solution and the prepared concentration were inverted several times to ensure adequate mixing and homogeneity. - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: green algae
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), SAMS Research Services Ltd, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban, Argyll, Scotland.
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): Approximately 3 to 4 days before the start of the test, inoculum cultures of algae was set up at an initial cell density of approximately 103 cells/mL.
- Method of cultivation: The flasks were plugged with polyurethane foam stoppers and kept under constant agitation by orbital shaker (approximately 150 rpm) and constant illumination at 24 ±1 °C until the algal cell density was approximately 105 to 106 cells/mL. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 24 ±1 ºC throughout the test
- pH:
- 8.2-8.3
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Analysis of the test preparations at 0 and 72 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 86 to 80 mg/L (86% to 79% of nominal) respectively. As there was no significant change in the measured concentrations at 72 hours, the results are based on the 0-hour measured test concentration.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Due to the potentially volatile nature of the test item, testing was conducted in completely filled, stoppered test vessels (250 mL glass conical flasks) in order to minimize possible losses due to volatilization.
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed
- Aeration: no
- Following the recommendations of published data (Herman et al 1990) in order to prevent inhibition of growth due to the restriction of gaseous exchange, additional sodium bicarbonate (250 mg/L) was added to the culture medium to provide a source of carbon dioxide for algal growth. Two replicate flasks were used for each control and test concentration. The test item was dissolved directly in culture medium.
- Initial cells density: initial nominal cell density of 5.00 x 103 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates):6
- No. of vessels per control (replicates):6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: no
- Detailed composition if non-standard medium was used:
NaNO3 25.5 mg/L, MgCl2.6H2O 12.16 mg/L, CaCl2.2H2O 4.41 mg/L, MgSO4.7H2O 14.6 mg/L, K2HPO4 1.044 mg/L, NaHCO3 15.0 mg/L, H3BO3 0.186 mg/L, MnCl2.4H2O 0.415 mg/L, ZnCl2 0.00327 mg/L, FeCl3.6H2O 0.160 mg/L, CoCl2.6H2O 0.00143 mg/L, Na2MoO4.2H2O 0.00726 mg/L, CuCl2.2H2O 0.000012 mg/L, Na2EDTA.2H2O 0.30 mg/L.
The culture medium was prepared using reverse osmosis purified deionized water* and the pH adjusted to 7.5 ± 0.1 with 0.1N NaOH or HCl.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
Samples were taken at 24, 48 and 72 hours and the cell densities determined using a Coulter® Multisizer Particle Counter. Three determinations were made for each sample. The nominal inoculated cell concentration (5.00 x 103 cells/mL) was taken as the starting cell density.
To determine the potential effect of the test item on the appearance of algal cells, a sample was removed from each test and control culture (replicates pooled) at the end of the test. The shape and size of the algal cells was inspected microscopically and any abnormalities recorded.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: limit test
- Range finding study: series of nominal test concentrations of 0.10, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L for a period of 72 hours.
- Test concentrations: main study: 100 mg/L (nominal), 86 mg/L (measured)
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: The results showed no effect on growth at the test concentrations of 0.10, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- potassium dichromate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 86 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Details on results:
- Growth data: the growth rate (r) and yield (y) of Raphidocelis subcapitata (CCAP 278/4) were not affected by the presence of the test item at a test concentration of 86 mg/L (based on the 0 hour measured test concentration) over the 72 hour exposure period. It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at concentrations in excess of 100 mg/L.
Inhibition of growth rate:
ErC10 (0 to 72 hour) : >86 mg/L
ErC20 (0 to 72 hour) : >86 mg/L
ErC50 (0 to 72 hour) : >86 mg/L
There were no statistically significant differences (P≥0.05), between the control and 86 mg/L test group and therefore the NOEC based on growth rate was 86 mg/L.
Inhibition of yield:
EyC10 (0 to 72 hour) : >86 mg/L
EyC20 (0 to 72 hour) : >86 mg/L
EyC50 (0 to 72 hour) : >86 mg/L
There were no statistically significant differences (P≥0.05), between the control and test group and therefore the NOEC based on yield was 86 mg/L. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Exposure of Raphidocelis subcapitata (CCAP 278/4) to the reference item gave the following results:
ErC50 (0 to 72 hour) : 1.2 mg/L; 95% confidence limits 1.1 to 1.3 mg/L
EyC50 (0 to 72 hour) : 0.51 mg/L; 95% confidence limits 0.45 to 0.58 mg/L
No Observed Effect Concentration based on growth rate: 0.25 mg/L
No Observed Effect Concentration based on yield: 0.125 mg/L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration based on growth rate: 0.50 mg/L
Lowest Observed Effect Concentration based on yield: 0.25 mg/L - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- A Student’s t-test incorporating Shapiro-Wilk’s Test on Normal Distribution and by Levene’s Test on Variance Homogeneity was carried out on the growth rate and yield data after 72 hours for the control and the 100 mg/L test concentration to determine any statistically significant differences between the test and control groups. All statistical analyses were performed using ToxRatPro software package (TOXRAT).
No statistical difference for all data collected - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Exposure of Raphidocelis subcapitata to the test item gave EC50 values (for growth rate and yield) based on the 0 hour measured test concentration of greater than 86 mg/L. The No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) was 86 mg/L.
It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at concentrations in excess of 100 mg/L. - Executive summary:
Introduction
A study was performed to assess the effect of the test item on the growth of the green alga Raphidocelis subcapitata (formerly known as Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata). The method followed was designed to be compatible with the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (2006) No 201, "Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test" and Method C.3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 761/2009.
Methods
Due to the potentially volatile nature of the test item, testing was conducted in completely filled, stoppered test vessels in order to minimize possible losses due to volatilization. Following the recommendations of published data (Herman et al 1990) in order to prevent inhibition of growth due to the restriction of gaseous exchange, additional sodium bicarbonate was added to the culture medium to provide a source of carbon dioxide for algal growth.
Following a preliminary range-finding test, Raphidocelis subcapitata was exposed to an aqueous solution of the test item at a nominal concentration of 100 mg/L (six replicate flasks) for 72 hours, under constant illumination and shaking at a temperature of 24 ±1 °C.
Samples of the algal populations were removed daily and cell concentrations determined for each control and treatment group, using a Coulter® Multisizer Particle Counter.
Results
Analysis of the test preparations at 0 and 72 hours showed measured test concentrations to range from 86 to 80 mg/L (86% to 79% of nominal) respectively. As there was no significant change in the measured concentrations at 72 hours, the results are based on the 0 hour measured test concentrations.
Exposure of Raphidocelis subcapitata to the test item gave EC50 values (for growth rate and yield) based on the 0 hour measured test concentration of greater than 86 mg/L. The No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) was 86 mg/L.
It was considered unnecessary and unrealistic to test at concentrations in excess of 100 mg/L.
Reference
Description of key information
Exposure of Raphidocelis subcapitata to the test item gave EC50 values (for growth rate and yield) based on the 0 hour measured test concentration of greater than 86 mg/L. The No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) was 86 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 86 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.