Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-473-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 22.10.2018 - 30.11.2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2004
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- A water accommodated fraction (WAF) equilibration trail was performed prior to exposure. The purpose of the equilibration trail is to determine the optimum mixing duration to be used for WAF preparation. One WAF was prepared at each of three loading levels 1.0, 50.0 and 100 mg/L. At 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours after initiation of mixing, mixing was stopped and the solutions were allowed to settle for one hour. A sample of WAF was removed from each loading level and mixing was resumed. The concentration of organic carbon that had solubilized into the WAF from the test substance was measured using the TOC analyzer (TOC Analyzer/TNML; Make: Shimadzu; Model: LCPH E200 ROHS).
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Waterflea
- Strain: Straus
- Source: Environmental and Molecular Toxicology Division, Department of Zoology, Karnataka University, Karnataka, India
- Feeding during test: no
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 48h
- Acclimation conditions: same as test conditions
- Type and amount of food: live algal cells (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) of 2 mL per liter
- Health during acclimation: no mortality - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Hardness:
- 216 mg CaCO3/L
- Test temperature:
- 20.1 to 21.3°C
- pH:
- 7.16 to 7.83
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 7.89 to 8.44 mg/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 3.4, 7.5, 16.5, 36.4 and 80 mg/L
no measured concentrations - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: glass jars
- Material, fill volume: glass, 100 mL
- Aeration: no
- Renewal of test media: after 24 h
- No. of organisms per vessel: 5
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 1
TEST MEDIUM PARAMETERS
- Preparation of dilution water: reconstituted water according to OECD 202 (with Calcium chloride, Potassium chloride, Magnesium sulfate and Sodium bicarbonate)
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 16 hours of light and 8 hours dark cycle
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
Each test vessel was observed for immobilized Daphnids at 24 and 48 hours after the beginning of the test.
Total hardness of the diluent water (reconstituted water) prior to its use for exposure was analyzed. Temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen were recorded at the beginning and at end of the test in control and in all the tested concentrations.
RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 50 and 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: The immobilization percentages of 30, 80 and 100 % were recorded at the nominal loading rates of 10.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mg/L, respectively, during the 48 hour observation period. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Potassium dichromate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- 18 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 3.4 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mobility
- Details on results:
- No clinical signs of toxicity or immobilisation were observed in control and at the nominal loading rate of 3.4 mg/L during the 48 hour observation period. Daphnids localized on bottom of container and lethargy was observed at the nominal loading rates of 7.5, 16.5 and 36.4 mg/L during the 24 and 48 hour observation period. Daphnids localized on bottom of container and lethargy was observed at the nominal loading rates of 80.0 mg/L during the 24 hour observation period. The immobilization percentages of 15, 40, 70 and 100 % were recorded at the tested nominal loading rates of 7.5, 16.5, 36.4 and 80.0 mg/L, during the 48 hour observation period.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- The 48 hour EC50 of the reference substance Potassium dichromate on Daphnia magna was determined to be 0.57 mg/L. Thus, the 48 hour EC50 of the reference substance was within the acceptance range of the guideline (0.50 to 2.12 mg/L) confirming the suitability of the test system.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The 48-hour EL50 of the test item on Daphnia magna was determined to be 18 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The test item was evaluated for acute toxicity on Daphnia magna as per the OECD Guideline No. 202, “Daphnia sp., Acute Immobilisation Test”. Daphnids were exposed for the test item by aqueous exposure (treatment) under static condition. Daphnidswere observed at 24 and48 hours for signs of toxicity and immobilisation. Range Finding Study: No clinical signs of toxicity or immobilization were observed in control and at the nominal loading rates of 0.01, 0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 mg/L during the 48 hour observation period. Clinical sign of lethargy and localized on bottom of container was observed at 24 hour observation and clinical sign of localized on bottom of container was observed at 48 hour observation period at the nominal loading rates of 50.0 mg/L. Daphnids localized on bottom of container and lethargy was observed at the nominal loading rate of 100.0 mg/L during the 24 hour observation period. The immobilization percentages of 30, 80 and 100 % were recorded at the nominal loading rates of 10.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mg/L, respectively, during the 48 hour observation period.
Main Study: Based on the results of the range finding study, main study was conducted at the nominal loading of 3.4, 7.5, 16.5, 36.4 and 80.0 mg/L test item of test medium along with control. No clinical signs of toxicity or immobilisation were observed in control at the nominal loading rate of 3.4 mg/L during the 48 hour observation period. Daphnids localized on bottom of container and lethargy was observed at the nominal loading rates of 7.5, 16.5 and 36.4 mg/L during the 24 and 48 hour observation period. Daphnids localized on bottom of container and lethargy was observed at the nominal loading rates of 80.0 mg/L during the 24 hour observation period. The immobilization percentages of 15, 40, 70 and 100 % were recorded at the tested nominal loading rates of 7.5, 16.5, 36.4 and 80.0 mg/L, during the 48 hour observation period.Based on the results of the experiment and under experimental conditions employed, it is concluded that the 48 hour acute median Effective Lethal Loading Rate (EL50) of test item on Daphnia magna is 18.00 mg/L. The 95% confidence interval with lower limit of 14.69 mg/L and upper limit of 22.06 mg/L.The NOEC was 3.4 mg/L.
Reference
Table1: Summary of immobilization at different time points during main study
Group |
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
R |
Initial No. of Daphnids |
No. of Daphnids immobilized |
Cummulative No. |
% of Immobilisation |
|||
24 h |
48 h |
24 h |
48 h |
24 h |
48 h |
||||
G1 |
0 |
R1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
G2 |
3.4 |
R1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
R2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
G3 |
7.5 |
R1 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
15 |
R2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
||||||
G4 |
16.5 |
R1 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
20 |
40 |
R2 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
||||||
G5 |
36.4 |
R1 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
14 |
35 |
*70 |
R2 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
||||||
G6 |
80.0 |
R1 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
12 |
20 |
60 |
*100 |
R2 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
||||||
R3 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
||||||
R4 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
h: hour; R: Replicate; *: Statistical significance of >0.05.
Table 2: TOC analysis during main study
|
|
TOC During Exposure |
||||
Group |
Nominal Loading rate (mg/L) |
Day 0 |
Day 1 |
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
|
G1 |
0.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
G2 |
3.4 |
2.1210 |
1.960 |
1.927 |
1.822 |
|
G3 |
7.5 |
2.5200 |
2.104 |
2.292 |
2.076 |
|
G4 |
16.5 |
4.7940 |
3.831 |
4.149 |
4.100 |
|
G5 |
36.4 |
8.6140 |
7.623 |
10.120 |
9.813 |
|
G6 |
80.0 |
20.070 |
19.780 |
24.260 |
24.440 |
Description of key information
The 48-hour EL50 of the test item on Daphnia magna was determined to be 18 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 18 mg/L
Additional information
The test item was evaluated for acute toxicity on Daphnia magna as per the OECD Guideline No. 202, “Daphnia sp., Acute Immobilisation Test”. Daphnids were exposed for the test item by aqueous exposure (treatment) under static condition. Daphnids were observed at 24 and 48 hours for signs of toxicity and immobilisation. Range Finding Study: No clinical signs of toxicity or immobilization were observed in control and at the nominal loading rates of 0.01, 0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 mg/L during the 48 hour observation period. Clinical sign of lethargy and localized on bottom of container was observed at 24 hour observation and clinical sign of localized on bottom of container was observed at 48 hour observation period at the nominal loading rates of 50.0 mg/L. Daphnids localized on bottom of container and lethargy was observed at the nominal loading rate of 100.0 mg/L during the 24 hour observation period. The immobilization percentages of 30, 80 and 100 % were recorded at the nominal loading rates of 10.0, 50.0 and 100.0 mg/L, respectively, during the 48 hour observation period.
Main Study: Based on the results of the range finding study, main study was conducted at the nominal loading of 3.4, 7.5, 16.5, 36.4 and 80.0 mg/L test item of test medium along with control. No clinical signs of toxicity or immobilisation were observed in control at the nominal loading rate of 3.4 mg/L during the 48 hour observation period. Daphnids localized on bottom of container and lethargy was observed at the nominal loading rates of 7.5, 16.5 and 36.4 mg/L during the 24 and 48 hour observation period. Daphnids localized on bottom of container and lethargy was observed at the nominal loading rates of 80.0 mg/L during the 24 hour observation period. The immobilization percentages of 15, 40, 70 and 100 % were recorded at the tested nominal loading rates of 7.5, 16.5, 36.4 and 80.0 mg/L, during the 48 hour observation period. Based on the results of the experiment and under experimental conditions employed, it is concluded that the 48 hour acute median Effective Lethal Loading Rate (EL50) of test item on Daphnia magna is 18.00 mg/L. The 95% confidence interval with lower limit of 14.69 mg/L and upper limit of 22.06 mg/L. The NOEC was 3.4 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.