Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
24 Jul - 16 Aug 2012
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see “remarks”
Remarks:
GLP-Guideline study. According to the ECHA guidance document “Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (Dec 2012)”, the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
Justification for type of information:
refer to analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
147256-33-5
EC Number:
604-580-1
Cas Number:
147256-33-5
IUPAC Name:
147256-33-5

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Wistar (RccHanTM:WIST)
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK
- Age at study initiation: 8-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 146-166 g (first group) and 157-163 g (second group)
- Fasting period before study: animals were fasted overnight immediately before the day of dosing and for approx. 3 to 4 h after dosing.
- Housing: animals were housed in groups of 3 in suspended solid-floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes and environmental enrichment items.
- Diet: 2014C Teklad Global Diet (Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK), ad libitum
- Water: drinking water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-25
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 2.18 mL/kg

CLASS METHOD
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: based on available information on the toxicity of the test item, 2000 mg/kg bw was chosen as the starting dose.
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3 per group
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: animals were observed for mortalities and overt signs of toxicity 30 min, 1, 2 and 4 h after dosing and subsequently once daily during the 14-day observation period.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight

Results and discussion

Effect levelsopen allclose all
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: LD50 experimental
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 5 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: LD50 cut-off according to OECD 423
Mortality:
No mortalities were observed during the study period.
Clinical signs:
other: No signs of systemic toxicity were noted during the 14-day observation period.
Gross pathology:
At gross pathology, no abnormalities were found.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified