Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: other route
Type of information:
experimental study
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Uptake, Accumulation, and Biomarkers of PM2.5-Associated Organophosphate Flame Retardants in C57BL/6 Mice after Chronic Exposure at Real Environmental Concentrations
Author:
Chen M
Bibliographic source:
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 9519−9528

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
no guideline followed

Test animals

Species:
mouse

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
other: intratracheal
Details on exposure:
20 μL of an OPFR standard solution (mixture of 6 different flame retardants, including tributyl phosphate) or 20 μL 0.9% saline was injected through the mouth into the trachea. The OPFR exposure concentrations are calculated based on the respiratory volume of an adult mouse (30 mL·min−1). Instillation was performed once every three days for 72 days.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Details on results:
The mice were randomly divided into four groups, each with eight mice: a control group (C-group), a low OPFR dosage group (L-group, 0.088 μg·kg−1·day−1) whose dosage corresponds approximately to the OPFR concentration observed in PM2.5 samples collected in Guangzhou during winter, a medium dosage group (M-group, 0.88 μg·kg−1·day−1), and a high dosage group (H-group, 8.8 μg·kg−1·day−1). Intratracheal instillation of mice was performed as described previously. Briefly, 20 μL of an OPFR standard solution (mixture of 6 different flame retardants, including tributyl phosphate) or 20 μL 0.9% saline was injected through the mouth into the trachea. The OPFR exposure concentrations are calculated based on the respiratory volume of an adult mouse (30 mL·min−1). Instillation was performed once every three days for 72 days. After 72 days of exposure mice were sacrificed after the final exposure and all samples were stored at −80 °C. The sum of organophosphate flame retardants (OPFR) concentrations in tissues from mice in the medium dosage group decreased in the order of intestine > heart > stomach > testis > kidney > spleen > brain > liver > lung > muscle. Of the OPFRs detected in all three exposure groups, chlorinated alkyl OPFRs were most heavily accumulated in mice. We found a significant positive correlation between the bioaccumulation ratio and octanol−air partition coefficient (KOA) in mice tissues for low log KOW OPFR congeners (log KOW ≤ 4, p < 0.05). Three urinary metabolites (di-p-cresyl phosphate: DCrP, diphenyl phosphate: DPhP, dibutyl phosphate: DnBP) were detected from the high dosage group.
This study is of low relevance for the assessment of di- and tributyl phosphate due to test item being a OPFR mixture, the intratracheal route of exposure, the explorative nature and test system.

Applicant's summary and conclusion