Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Source: "l'elevage Cunicole de Val de Seile, 80160 Prouzel, France"
Acclimation: at least 5 days
Weight: 2.6 +/- 0.2 kg
Temperature: 20 +/- 3°C
Relative humidity: 50 +/- 20%
Light period: 12h light / 12h dark
Feed: "Lapins entretien reference 112 C" (U.A.R., 91360 Villemoisson-Sur-Orge, France), ad libitum
Water: filtered tap water, ad libitum
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 mL in the conjunctival sac of the left eye
Duration of treatment / exposure:
One application
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 24, 48 and 72h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
Eye reactions were evaluated and scored (0 - 4) for chemosis (lids), eye watering and redness (conjunctive tissues, cornea and iris).
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: after 1 h
Score:
>= 0 - <= 2
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 h
Remarks on result:
other: chemosis, enanthema and redness
Irritation parameter:
other: eye watering
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 h
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 h
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Some slight conjunctival reactions (chemosis with a score < or = to 1, enanthema with a score of 1 to 2, and redness with a score of < or = to 1.3) were observed in the 3 rabbits after 1h. Neither iris irritation nor corneal opacity were recorded. Reactions were fully reversible; no effects were seen at 24, 48 and 72h.

None.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the study conditions, the test substance was not considered to be irritating to rabbit eye.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to determine the eye irritation potential of the test substance, isoC18 MIPA (purity not specified), according to EU Method B.5, in compliance with GLP. Three male rabbits (New-Zealand White) received 0.1 mL of the undiluted test substance in the conjunctival sac of the left eye. The right eye remained untreated and served as control. Observations were made at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h. Eye reactions were evaluated and scored (0 - 4) for chemosis (lids), eye watering and redness (conjunctive tissues, cornea and iris). Some slight conjunctival reactions (chemosis with a score of ≤ 1 and enanthema with a score of 1 to 2) were observed in the 3 rabbits after 1 h. Neither iris irritation nor corneal opacity were recorded. Reactions were fully reversible; no effects were seen at 24, 48 and 72 h. Under the study conditions, the test substance was not considered to be irritating to rabbit eye (Clouzeau, 1992).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin

A study was conducted to determine the skin irritation / corrosion potential of the test substance, isoC18 MIPA (purity not specified), according to EU Method B.4, in compliance with GLP. Three male rabbits (New Zealand White) were exposed for 4 h to 0.5 mL undiluted test substance, under a semiocclusive bandage. The left flank remained untreated and served as control. Observations were made at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and daily thereafter (for 9 d). Skin reactions (erythema and oedema) were evaluated using the Draize scoring and measured after 24, 48 and 72 h. Significant skin reactions were observed for at least 48 h in the 3 animals. These erythema reactions persisted for 72 h after treatment (mean scores of 1.7, 2.0 and 2.0 in each animal). No oedema was observed. From Day 5, the erythema decreased and disappeared on Day 8. A darkness of the skin persisted until Day 8. Under the study conditions, the test substance was considered to be irritating to rabbit skin but not sufficiently to trigger classification according to CLP (EC 1272/2008) criteria (Clouzeau, 1992).

Eyes

A study was conducted to determine the eye irritation potential of the test substance, isoC18 MIPA (purity not specified), according to EU Method B.5, in compliance with GLP. Three male rabbits (New-Zealand White) received 0.1 mL of the undiluted test substance in the conjunctival sac of the left eye. The right eye remained untreated and served as control. Observations were made at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h. Eye reactions were evaluated and scored (0 - 4) for chemosis (lids), eye watering and redness (conjunctive tissues, cornea and iris). Some slight conjunctival reactions (chemosis with a score of ≤ 1 and enanthema with a score of 1 to 2) were observed in the 3 rabbits after 1 h. Neither iris irritation nor corneal opacity were recorded. Reactions were fully reversible; no effects were seen at 24, 48 and 72 h. Under the study conditions, the test substance was not considered to be irritating to rabbit eye (Clouzeau, 1992).

Justification for classification or non-classification

Skin

Based on the results of an in vivo study, classification for skin irritation as XXXX is warranted for the test substance according to CLP (EC 1272/2008) criteria.

Eye

Based on the results of an in vivo study, no classification for eye irritation is required for the test substance according to CLP (EC 1272/2008) criteria.