Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 250-774-0 | CAS number: 31714-55-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09 September 2002 - 11 October 2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 002
- Report date:
- 2002
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- (1992)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- (1996)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Adequate data from a guinea pig maximisation test are available since 2002.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hydrogen bis[1-[(5-chloro-2-hydroxyphenyl)azo]-2-naphtholato(2-)]chromate(1-)
- EC Number:
- 250-774-0
- EC Name:
- Hydrogen bis[1-[(5-chloro-2-hydroxyphenyl)azo]-2-naphtholato(2-)]chromate(1-)
- Cas Number:
- 31714-55-3
- Molecular formula:
- C32H19Cl2CrN4O4
- IUPAC Name:
- [1-{[5-chloro-2-(hydroxy-kappaO)phenyl]diazenyl}-2-naphtholato(2-)-kappaO]{1-[(5-chloro-2-hydroxyphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphtholato-kappaO}chromium
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Appearance: black powder
- Storage conditions: room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Hall Limited, Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK
- Age at study initiation: 8-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 311-395 g
- Housing: Singly or in pairs in solid-floor polypropylene cages
- Diet: Certified Guinea Pig Diet, International Product Supplies Limited, UK (ad libitum)
- Water: tap water (ad libitum)
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (set conditions)
- Temperature (°C): 17-23
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Induction
- Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Concentration / amount:
- - 25% for the intradermal induction
- 50% for the epidermal induction
Challenge
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Concentration / amount:
- - 25% and 10% for the challenge
- No. of animals per dose:
- - Range finding tests: 7 (see below for details)
- Main study: Test animals: 10; Control: 5 - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS
- Selection of concentration for intradermal induction: Intradermal injections (0.1 mL/injection site) were made on the clipped shoulder of 3 guinea pigs, using concentrations of 5, 10 and 25%. The degree of erythema at the injection sites was assessed approx. 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days after injection. Any evidence of systemic toxicity was also recorded.
- Selection of concentration for epidermal induction: Two guinea pigs (intradermally injected with FCA 8 days earlier) were treated with test substance concentrations of 50, 25, 10 and 5%. Applications were made to the clipped flanks under occlusive dressings for an exposure period of 48 hours. The degree of erythema and oedema was evaluated approx. 1, 24 and 48 hours after dressing removal.
- Selection of concentration for challenge:The test substance concentrations 50, 25, 10 and 5% were applied to the clipped flanks of 2 guinea pigs under occlusive dressings for an exposure period of 24 hours. These guinea pigs had been treated identically to the control animals of the main study, up to Day 14. The degree of erythema and oedema was evaluated approx. 1, 24 and 48 hours after dressing removal. Next to the highest non-irritant concentration, also one lower concentration was selected for the main study.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE (test animals)
- No. of exposures: 2
1) Intradermal injections:
- Shortly before treatment on Day 0 the hair was removed from an area approx. 40 mm x 60 mm on the shoulder region of each animal with veterinary clippers.
- A row of 3 injections, each of 0.1 mL, was made on each side of the mid-line into a 20 mm x 40 mm area:
-- FCA (50% in distilled water)
-- 25% of the test substance in the vehicle
-- a 25% formulation of the test substance in a 1:1 preparation of FCA plus vehicle
- Readings: Approx. 24 and 48 hours after intradermal injection the degree of erythema at the test substance injection sites was evaluated
2) Topical application:
- On day 7 the same area on the shoulder region used previously for the intradermal injections was clipped again.
- A filter paper patch (Whatman No. 4; 40 x 20 mm) loaded with the formulation of the test substance in vehicle (at 50%) was applied to the prepared skin and held in place with a strip of surgical adhesive tape covered with an overlapping length of aluminium foil. The patch and foil were further secured with a strip of elastic adhesive bondage wound in a double layer around the torso of each animal.
- This occlusive dressing was kept in place for 48 hours.
- Readings: The degree of erythema and oedema was evaluated 1 and 24 hours after patch removal. Any other reactions were also recorded.
INDUCTION (control animals)
The control animals were treated as described for the experimental animals except that, instead of the test substance, vehicle alone was administered.
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE (all animals)
- Shortly before treatment on Day 21, an area of approx. 50 x 70 mm on both flanks of each animal was clipped free of hair with veterinary clippers
- Square filter paper patches (Whatman No. 4; approx. 20 x 20 mm) loaded with the test substance in vehicle:
-- Were applied at 25% to the shorn right flank of each animal
-- Were applied at 10% to the shorn left flank of each animal
- The patches were held in place with a strip of surgical adhesive tape
- The patches were occluded with an overlapping length of aluminium foil and secured with a strip of elastic adhesive bondage wound in a double layer around the torso of each animal
- After 24 hours, the dressing was carefully removed and the challenge sites were swabbed with cotton wool soaked in diethyl ether to remove residual test substance.
- Prior to the 24 hours observation, the flanks were clipped again
- The degree of erythema and oedema was evaluated 24 and 48 hours after the removal of the patches
(48 and 72 hours after the start of the exposure) - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- (a reliability check is carried out at regular intervals to check the sensitivity of the test system)
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- The latest reliability check was carried out in May/June 2002 using 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole. In this study, a sensitisation rate of 80% was found, showing that the test system is reliable.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 4
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 4
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 4
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 4
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 50% and 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 8
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: Results for latest reliability check (May/June 2002)
Any other information on results incl. tables
RANGE FINDING TESTS
- Selection of concentration for intradermal induction: There was no evidence of systemic toxicity. Black coloured staining prevented evaluation of erythema. Focal eschar was observed at 10 and at 25%, after 7 days, in 2 of the 3 animals. Based on the results, the highest tested concentration of 25% was choosen for the main study.
- Selection of concentration for epidermal induction: At all concentrations, in both animals, moderate and confluent erythema was observed after 1 hour. After 24 hours, discrete or patchy erythema was observed at 50 and 25% in both animals. No erythema was observed after 48 hours. No oedema was observed. Black coloured staining was observed. Based on the results, the highest tested concentration of 50% was choosen for the main study (max. attainable concentration suitable for topical application for a solid).
- Selection of concentration for challenge: At 50%, moderate and confluent erythema was observed after 1 hour in both animals and discrete or patchy erythema after 24 hours in 1 of the 2 animals. At 25%, moderate and confluent erythema was observed after 1 hour in both animals. At 10%, moderate and confluent erythema in an animal and discrete or patchy erythema in the other animal was observed after 1 hour. At 5%, discrete or patchy erythema was observed in both animals only after 1 hour. Oedema was only observed after 1 hour, at 50%.
As no erythema nor oedema was observed after 24 hours at 25% (while erythema was observed at 50%) this concentration, as well as additionally 10%, was choosen for the main study.
MAIN STUDY
- Readings (intradermal induction):
-- Black coloured staining, which prevented evaluation of erythema, was noted at the induction sites of all test group aninals
-- Discrete or patchy erythema was noted at the induction sites of all control group animals, only 24 hours after the injections, on both sides of the mid-line
- Readings (topical induction):
-- Black coloured staining, which prevented evaluation of erythema, was noted at the induction sites of all test group aninals
-- Moderate and confluent erythema was noted at the induction sites of all control group animals, 1 hour after patch removal
-- Discrete or patchy erythema was noted at the induction sites of 3 of the 5 control group animals, 24 hours after patch removal
-- Bleeding from the intradermal injection sites was noted in all test group animals and in 1 control group animal
-- No oedema was observed
- Readings (challenge):
-- Black coloured staining was noted at the challenge sites of all aninals. This did not affect evaluation of skin reactions.
-- On Day 21, one of the control animals was humanely killed. This did not affect the integrity of the study.
-- No skin reactions were noted in any of the 14 animals at the challenge sites
- Other information:
-- Body weights and body weight gain of experimental animals remained in the same range as controls over the study period
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Conclusions:
- In a guinea pig maximisation test performed according to OECD 406, the substance is not considered a skin sensitiser.
- Executive summary:
The skin sensitisation potential of the substance (a solid) was investigated by performing a guinea pig maximisation test in accordance with OECD 406 and according to GLP principles. Arachis oil was used as vehicle. Test substance concentrations selected for the main study were based on the results of a preliminary study. Reliable positive and negative controls were included.
A concentration of 25% was used for the intradermal induction, 50% for the epidermal induction (max. attainable concentration) and 25% and 10% for the challenge. As none of the test group animals showed sensitisation effects after challenge, the substance does not need to be classified as a skin sensitiser in accordance with the CLP Regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.