Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Effects on fertility

Description of key information

Toxicity of the target chemical was predicted by QSAR "Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART)". The target chemical was predicted to fall under the category "Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential".

Based on the modelled conditions, the reproductive NOEL of the test material in the rabbit was determined to be ca. 370 mg/kg bw/day.

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
reproductive toxicity, other
Remarks:
Not specified
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2017
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a (Q)SAR model, with limited documentation / justification, but validity of model and reliability of prediction considered adequate based on a generally acknowledged source
Justification for type of information:
A read-across justification report (RAAF) will be added to Section 13 as soon as possible.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: REACH guidance on QSARs R.6. May/July 2006
Deviations:
not specified
Principles of method if other than guideline:
This QSAR model is based on profiling results obtained by DART scheme v 1.0. This QSAR is used for identifying chemicals with structural features associated with the potential to act as reproductive or developmental toxicants.

The outcome of the QSAR model is “Known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential”, if the chemical has a potential to cause toxicity. The corresponding category is displayed in the report generated for the obtained prediction.

The other prediction results are “Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential” if the toxic potential of the input chemical is not known, and “Not covered by current version of the decision tree” if the identified structural features are not objects of the tree.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
As no laboratory work took place, compliance with GLP is not required.
Species:
other: QSAR; species not specified
Dose descriptor:
other: Developmental toxicity potential
Based on:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential.
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Critical effects observed:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
other: Reproductive toxicity potential
Generation:
other: Not specified
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: Not known reproductive and developmental toxic potential
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Critical effects observed:
not specified
Reproductive effects observed:
not specified

Toxicity of the target chemical (Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential) is predicted by QSAR "Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART)". The current prediction has no applicability domain.

Conclusions:
Toxicity of the target chemical was predicted by QSAR "Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART)". The target chemical was predicted to fall under the category "Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential".
Executive summary:

The potential of the test material to cause reproductive or developmental toxicity was modelled using the OECD QSAR Toolbox. This QSAR model is based on profiling results obtained by DART scheme v 1.0. This QSAR is used for identifying chemicals with structural features associated with the potential to act as reproductive or developmental toxicants.

 

Toxicity of the target chemical was predicted by QSAR "Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART)". The target chemical was predicted to fall under the category "Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential".

Endpoint:
reproductive toxicity, other
Remarks:
Not specified
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2018
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The following prediction was performed using the OECD QSAR Toolbox. A category was formed based on the current endpoint (DART scheme). The prediction was further refined from a large database of metadata based on relevant subcategories.
Justification for type of information:
A read-across justification report (RAAF) will be added to Section 13 as soon as possible.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6, May/July 2008
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
As no laboratory work took place, compliance with GLP is not required.
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
368 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: Based on the modelled conditions
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
The prediction was based on the average value from the 5 nearest neighbours compared by prediction descriptors.
Critical effects observed:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Generation:
other: Not specified
Effect level:
368 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: Based on the modelled conditions
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
The prediction was based on the average value from the 5 nearest neighbours compared by prediction descriptors.
Critical effects observed:
not specified
Reproductive effects observed:
not specified
Lowest effective dose / conc.:
368 mg/kg bw/day
Treatment related:
not specified

The prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following descriptors: NOEL

Estimation method: Takes average value from the 5 nearest neighbours

Domain logical expression: Result: In Domain

 

Substances used for the prediction should be:

Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential 'Strict' (DART scheme)

<AND> Bioavailable (Lipinski Rule Oasis)

Conclusions:
Based on the modelled conditions, the developmental NOEL of the test material in the rabbit was determined to be ca. 370 mg/kg bw/day.
Executive summary:

The developmental toxicity of the test material was evaluated using a read-across approach. Suitable analogues were found in the OECD QSAR Toolbox using the DART scheme category, and the results were refined using relevant subcategories.

 

Based on the modelled conditions, the developmental NOEL of the test material in the rabbit was determined to be ca. 370 mg/kg bw/day.

 

The target chemical falls within the applicability domain of the prediction.

Effect on fertility: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

The potential of the test material to cause reproductive or developmental toxicity was modelled using the OECD QSAR Toolbox. This QSAR model is based on profiling results obtained by DART scheme v 1.0. This QSAR is used for identifying chemicals with structural features associated with the potential to act as reproductive or developmental toxicants.

Toxicity of the target chemical was predicted by QSAR "Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART)". The target chemical was predicted to fall under the category "Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential".

The reproductive toxicity of the test material was evaluated using a read-across approach. Suitable analogues were found in the OECD QSAR Toolbox using the DART scheme category, and the results were refined using relevant subcategories.

Based on the modelled conditions, the reproductive NOEL of the test material in the rabbit was determined to be ca. 370 mg/kg bw/day.

The target chemical falls within the applicability domain of the prediction.

Effects on developmental toxicity

Description of key information

Toxicity of the target chemical was predicted by QSAR "Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART)". The target chemical was predicted to fall under the category "Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential".

Based on the modelled conditions, the developmental NOEL of the test material in the rabbit was determined to be ca. 370 mg/kg bw/day.

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2017
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a (Q)SAR model, with limited documentation / justification, but validity of model and reliability of prediction considered adequate based on a generally acknowledged source
Justification for type of information:
See read-across justification in Section 13.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other:
Version / remarks:
REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6, May/July 2008
Principles of method if other than guideline:
This QSAR model is based on profiling results obtained by DART scheme v 1.0. This QSAR is used for identifying chemicals with structural features associated with the potential to act as reproductive or developmental toxicants.

The outcome of the QSAR model is “Known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential”, if the chemical has a potential to cause toxicity. The corresponding category is displayed in the report generated for the obtained prediction.

The other prediction results are “Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential” if the toxic potential of the input chemical is not known, and “Not covered by current version of the decision tree” if the identified structural features are not objects of the tree.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
As no laboratory work took place, compliance with GLP is not required.
Limit test:
no
Species:
other: QSAR; species not specified
Dose descriptor:
other: Developmental toxicity potential
Based on:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential.
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Dose descriptor:
other:
Based on:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Abnormalities:
not specified
Developmental effects observed:
not specified

Toxicity of the target chemical (Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential) is predicted by QSAR "Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART)". The current prediction has no applicability domain.

Conclusions:
Toxicity of the target chemical was predicted by QSAR "Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART)". The target chemical was predicted to fall under the category "Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential".
Executive summary:

The potential of the test material to cause reproductive or developmental toxicity was modelled using the OECD QSAR Toolbox. This QSAR model is based on profiling results obtained by DART scheme v 1.0. This QSAR is used for identifying chemicals with structural features associated with the potential to act as reproductive or developmental toxicants.

Toxicity of the target chemical was predicted by QSAR "Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART)". The target chemical was predicted to fall under the category "Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential".

Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2018
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The following prediction was performed using the OECD QSAR Toolbox. A category was formed based on the current endpoint (DART scheme). The prediction was further refined from a large database of metadata based on relevant subcategories.
Justification for type of information:
See Read-Across Justification in Section 13.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6, May/July 2008
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
As no laboratory work took place, compliance with GLP is not required.
Limit test:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
368 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: Based on the modelled conditions
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
The prediction was based on the average value from the 5 nearest neighbours compared by prediction descriptors.
Abnormalities:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
368 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: Based on the modelled conditions
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
The prediction was based on the average value from the 5 nearest neighbours compared by prediction descriptors.
Abnormalities:
not specified
Developmental effects observed:
not specified
Lowest effective dose / conc.:
368 mg/kg bw/day
Treatment related:
not specified

The prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following descriptors: NOEL

Estimation method: Takes average value from the 5 nearest neighbours

Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain

Substances used for the prediction should be:

Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential 'Strict' (DART scheme)

<AND> Bioavailable (Lipinski Rule Oasis)

Conclusions:
Based on the modelled conditions, the developmental NOEL of the test material in the rabbit was determined to be ca. 370 mg/kg bw/day.
Executive summary:

The developmental toxicity of the test material was evaluated using a read-across approach. Suitable analogues were found in the OECD QSAR Toolbox using the DART scheme category, and the results were refined using relevant subcategories.

Based on the modelled conditions, the developmental NOEL of the test material in the rabbit was determined to be ca. 370 mg/kg bw/day.

The target chemical falls within the applicability domain of the prediction.

Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

The potential of the test material to cause reproductive or developmental toxicity was modelled using the OECD QSAR Toolbox. This QSAR model is based on profiling results obtained by DART scheme v 1.0. This QSAR is used for identifying chemicals with structural features associated with the potential to act as reproductive or developmental toxicants.

Toxicity of the target chemical was predicted by QSAR "Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity (DART)". The target chemical was predicted to fall under the category "Not known precedent reproductive and developmental toxic potential".

The developmental toxicity of the test material was evaluated using a read-across approach. Suitable analogues were found in the OECD QSAR Toolbox using the DART scheme category, and the results were refined using relevant subcategories.

Based on the modelled conditions, the developmental NOEL of the test material in the rabbit was determined to be ca. 370 mg/kg bw/day.

The target chemical falls within the applicability domain of the prediction.

Justification for classification or non-classification

In accordance with the criteria for classification as defined in Annex I, Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP), the substance does not require classification with respect to reproductive or developmental toxicity.

Additional information