Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
July 19 to August 30, 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442B (Skin Sensitization: Local Lymph Node Assay: BrdU-ELISA)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EC method B.51: Skin Sensitisation, Local Lymph Node Assay: BrdU-ELISA, Commission Regulations (EU) No. 640/2012, adopted July 06, 2012.
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N,N'-methylenediacrylamide
EC Number:
203-750-9
EC Name:
N,N'-methylenediacrylamide
Cas Number:
110-26-9
Molecular formula:
C7H10N2O2
IUPAC Name:
N,N'-methylenediacrylamide
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): N,N‘-Methylenediacrylamide
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance):
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance):
- Smiles notation (if other than submission substance):
- InChl (if other than submission substance):
- Structural formula attached as image file (if other than submission substance): see Fig.
- Substance type:
- Physical state:
- Analytical purity:
- Impurities (identity and concentrations):
- Composition of test material, percentage of components:
- Isomers composition:
- Purity test date:
- Lot/batch No.: LQ27A1677
- Expiration date of the lot/batch:
- Radiochemical purity (if radiolabelling):
- Specific activity (if radiolabelling):
- Locations of the label (if radiolabelling):
- Expiration date of radiochemical substance (if radiolabelling):
- Stability under test conditions: No data on stability were available to LPT.
- Storage condition of test material: No data on stability were available.
- Other: No 'Certificate of Analysis' was available .

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA:JN
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: JANVIER LABS.
Route des Chènes Secs C.S.4105
Le Genest-Saint-Isle
53941 Saint Berthevin Cedex
France

- Age at study initiation: approx. 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 20 - 27 g
- Housing: Before application the animals were housed in groups of 5 animals in MAKROLON cages (type III) with a basal surface of approx. 39 cm x 23 cm and a height of approx. 15 cm. After application the animals were housed singly in order to prevent them licking off the test item from the ears of the other animals.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ssniff® R/M-H V1534 (ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH).This food was offered ad libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water was offered ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): room temperature of 22°C ± 3°C (maximum range)
- Humidity (%): relative humidity of 55% ± 15% (maximum range)
- Air changes (per hr): 15 to 20 times per hr
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): The rooms were alternately lit (about 150 lux at approx. 1.50 m room height) and darkened for periods of 12 hours each.

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: First administration August 25, 2016; Termination of the experimental phase August 30, 2016

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Concentration:
10% (w/w)
25% (w/w)
50% (w/w)
No. of animals per dose:
30 (6 groups of 5 animals each)
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: 50% in N,N-dimethylformamide (w/w)
- Irritation: none
- Lymph node proliferation response: none

MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY: BRDU-ELISA
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: An index for the lymph node cell count ≥ 1.6 is considered positive.

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
An index for the lymph node cell count ≥ 1.6 is considered positive.
The test item formulations were administered to the dorsum of both animal's ears at an application volume of 25 µL/ear.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Statistics:
As no concentration-related increased values were observed, no statistical evaluation was carried out. Comparison of positive control to its negative control was carried out using Student’s t-test.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Treatment with the positive control item caused the expected increases in the BrdU labelling index. Therefore, the study can be regarded as valid.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.837
Test group / Remarks:
Group 2 (10%) / BrdU labelling index
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.019
Test group / Remarks:
Group 2 (10%) / Ear weight
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.038
Test group / Remarks:
Group 2 (10%) / Difference of ear thickness (TD 3)
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.052
Test group / Remarks:
Group 2 (10%) / Difference of ear thickness (TD 6)
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.771
Test group / Remarks:
Group 3 (25%) / BrdU labelling index
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.081
Test group / Remarks:
Group 3 (25%) / Ear weight
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.043
Test group / Remarks:
Group 3 (25%) / Difference of ear thickness (TD 3)
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.033
Test group / Remarks:
Group 3 (25%) / Difference of ear thickness (TD 6)
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.743
Test group / Remarks:
Group 4 (50%) / BrdU labelling index
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.063
Test group / Remarks:
Group 4 (50%) / Ear weight
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.071
Test group / Remarks:
Group 4 (50%) / Difference of ear thickness (TD 3)
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.038
Test group / Remarks:
Group 4 (50%) / Difference of ear thickness (TD 6)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Study results: stimulation indices (SI):

Parameter

Group 1, negative control

Group 2,

test item

10%

Group 3,

test item

25%

Group 4,

test item

50%

Group 5,

positive control

Group 6,
vehicle of

positive control

BrdU labelling index

1.000

0.837

0.771

0.743

1.778

1.000

Ear weight

1.000

1.019

1.081

1.063

1.228

1.000

Difference of

ear thickness

(TD 3)

1.000

1.038

1.043

1.071

1.078

1.000

Difference of

ear thickness

(TD 6)

1.000

1.052

1.033

1.038

1.128

1.000

       ____ increases significantly compared to control at p ≤ 0.01

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the test conditions, N,N‘-Methylenediacrylamide did not reveal any skin sensitising properties in the local lymph node assay: BrdU-ELISA.