Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-373-1 | CAS number: 5382-16-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation:
The dermal irritation potential of test chemical was estimated using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logPow as the primary descriptor. The test substance was estimated to be irritating into the skin of New Zealand White rabbits. Based on the estimated result test chemical can be considered to be irritating to skin and can be classified under the category ˋ“Category 2” as per CLP regulation.
Eye irritation:
The ocular irritation potential of Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) was estimated using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logPow as the primary descriptor. The substance Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) was estimated to be irritating into the eyes of Vienna White rabbits. Based on the estimated result Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) can be considered to be irritating to eye and can be classified under the category ˋ“Category 1” as per CLP regulation.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 and QMRF report has been attached
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: estimated data
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Data is from OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 and QMRF report has been attached
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material: 4-Hydroxypiperidine
- Molecular formula: C5H11NO
- Molecular weight: 101.148 g/mol
- Smiles notation: N1CCC(CC1)O
- InChl: 1S/C5H11NO/c7-5-1-3-6-4-2-5/h5-7H,1-4H2
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- No data available
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- No data available
- Observation period:
- No data available
- Number of animals:
- No data available
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Severe skin reactions were observed.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritant) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The substance Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) was estimated to be irritating into the skin of New Zealand White rabbits. Based on the estimated result Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) can be considered to be irritating to skin.
- Executive summary:
The dermal irritation potential of Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) was estimated using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logPow as the primary descriptor. The substance Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) was estimated to be irritating into the skin of New Zealand White rabbits. Based on the estimated result Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) can be considered to be irritating to skin and can be classified under the category ˋ“Category 2” as per CLP regulation.
Reference
Estimation
method: Takes mode value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
((((((((((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" or "d" )
and "e" )
and ("f"
and (
not "g")
)
)
and ("h"
and (
not "i")
)
)
and "j" )
and "k" )
and "l" )
and "m" )
and ("n"
and (
not "o")
)
)
and ("p"
and (
not "q")
)
)
and ("r"
and (
not "s")
)
)
and ("t"
and (
not "u")
)
)
and ("v"
and (
not "w")
)
)
and ("x"
and (
not "y")
)
)
and ("z"
and "aa" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Secondary amines by OECD HPV
Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Amines by US-EPA New
Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Narcotic Amine by Acute aquatic
toxicity MOA by OASIS
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Amines by Aquatic
toxicity classification by ECOSAR
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Bioavailable by Lipinski Rule
Oasis ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non-Metals by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkali Earth OR Alkaline Earth
OR Halogens OR Metalloids OR Transition Metals by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Group 14 - Carbon C AND Group 15
- Nitrogen N AND Group 16 - Oxygen O by Chemical elements
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Group 15 - Phosphorus P OR Group
16 - Sulfur S by Chemical elements
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
OC1CCNCC1
Threshold=10%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
OC1CCNCC1
Threshold=30%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
OC1CCNCC1
Threshold=40%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
OC1CCNCC1
Threshold=60%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not categorized by Repeated dose
(HESS)
Domain
logical expression index: "o"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic amines (Mucous
membrane irritation) Rank C OR Ethionine (Hepatotoxicity) Alert OR
Perhexiline (Hepatotoxicity) Alert by Repeated dose (HESS)
Domain
logical expression index: "p"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Inclusion rules not met by Skin
irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "q"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkylalkanol-amines OR Aromatic
amines OR Phenols OR Primary and secondary aliphatic amines by Skin
irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "r"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as (!Undefined)Group All Lipid
Solubility < 0.01 g/kg AND (!Undefined)Group CN Lipid Solubility < 0.4
g/kg by Skin irritation/corrosion Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "s"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Group All Melting Point > 200 C
OR Group CN Aqueous Solubility < 0.1 g/L OR Group CN Melting Point > 180
C OR Group CN Molecular Weight > 290 g/mol OR Group CN Vapour Pressure <
0.001 Pa by Skin irritation/corrosion Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "t"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Respiratory
sensitisation
Domain
logical expression index: "u"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Michael Addition OR Michael
Addition >> Polarised alkenes OR Michael Addition >> Polarised alkenes
>> Methacrylates OR Pro-Schiff base formation OR Pro-Schiff base
formation >> Pro-cross linking Schiff base OR Pro-Schiff base formation
>> Pro-cross linking Schiff base >> Ethanolamines by Respiratory
sensitisation
Domain
logical expression index: "v"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein
binding alerts for skin sensitization by OASIS v1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "w"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Michael Addition OR Michael
Addition >> Michael addition on conjugated systems with electron
withdrawing group OR Michael Addition >> Michael addition on conjugated
systems with electron withdrawing group >> alpha,beta-Carbonyl compounds
with polarized double bonds by Protein binding alerts for skin
sensitization by OASIS v1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "x"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not classified by Oncologic
Primary Classification
Domain
logical expression index: "y"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Carbamate Type Compounds by
Oncologic Primary Classification
Domain
logical expression index: "z"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -1.22
Domain
logical expression index: "aa"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 0.332
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 and QMRF report has been attached
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Estimated data
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction is done using QSAR Toolbox version 3.3
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material: 4-Hydroxypiperidine
- Molecular formula: C5H11NO
- Molecular weight: 101.148 g/mol
- Smiles notation: N1CCC(CC1)O
- InChl: 1S/C5H11NO/c7-5-1-3-6-4-2-5/h5-7H,1-4H2
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- No data available
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 days
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- No data available
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 8 days
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Severe eye irritation was observed.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)
- Conclusions:
- The substance Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) was estimated to be irritating into the eyes of Vienna White rabbits. Based on the estimated result Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) can be considered to be irritating to eye.
- Executive summary:
The ocular irritation potential of Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) was estimated using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logPow as the primary descriptor. The substance Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) was estimated to be irritating into the eyes of Vienna White rabbits. Based on the estimated result Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) can be considered to be irritating to eye and can be classified under the category ˋ“Category 1” as per CLP regulation.
Reference
Estimation
method: Takes mode value from the 8 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
(((((((((((((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" or "d" )
and ("e"
and (
not "f")
)
)
and ("g"
and (
not "h")
)
)
and ("i"
and (
not "j")
)
)
and ("k"
and (
not "l")
)
)
and ("m"
and (
not "n")
)
)
and ("o"
and (
not "p")
)
)
and ("q"
and (
not "r")
)
)
and ("s"
and (
not "t")
)
)
and ("u"
and (
not "v")
)
)
and "w" )
and ("x"
and (
not "y")
)
)
and ("z"
and (
not "aa")
)
)
and ("ab"
and (
not "ac")
)
)
and ("ad"
and (
not "ae")
)
)
and "af" )
and "ag" )
and ("ah"
and "ai" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Secondary amines by OECD HPV
Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Amines by US-EPA New
Chemical Categories
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Narcotic Amine by Acute aquatic
toxicity MOA by OASIS
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Amines by Aquatic
toxicity classification by ECOSAR
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Inclusion rules not met by Skin
irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkylalkanol-amines OR Esters of
organic sulfonic or sulfuric esters OR Ketones OR Phenols OR Primary and
secondary aliphatic amines OR Sulfonic acids or their salts OR Tertiary
aliphatic amine by Skin irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as (!Undefined)Group All Lipid
Solubility < 0.01 g/kg AND (!Undefined)Group CN Lipid Solubility < 0.4
g/kg by Skin irritation/corrosion Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as (!Undefined)Group C Surface
Tension > 62 mN/m OR (!Undefined)Group CNHal Lipid Solubility < 4 g/kg
OR (!Undefined)Group CNHal Lipid Solubility < 400 g/kg OR
(!Undefined)Group CNS Surface Tension > 62 mN/m OR Exclusion rules not
met OR Group All log Kow < -3.1 OR Group All log Kow > 9 OR Group All
Melting Point > 200 C OR Group C Aqueous Solubility < 0.0001 g/L OR
Group C Melting Point > 55 C OR Group C Vapour Pressure < 0.0001 Pa OR
Group CN Aqueous Solubility < 0.0001 g/L OR Group CN Aqueous Solubility
< 0.1 g/L OR Group CN log Kow > 4.5 OR Group CN log Kow > 5.5 OR Group
CN Melting Point > 180 C OR Group CN Molecular Weight > 290 g/mol OR
Group CN Molecular Weight > 540 g/mol OR Group CN Vapour Pressure <
0.001 Pa OR Group CNHal Aqueous Solubility < 0.001 g/L OR Group CNHal
Aqueous Solubility < 0.1 g/L OR Group CNHal log Kow > 3.8 OR Group CNHal
Molecular Weight > 370 g/mol OR Group CNHal Molecular Weight > 380 g/mol
OR Group CNS log Kow < 0.5 OR Group CNS log Kow < -2 OR Group CNS
Melting Point > 120 C OR Group CNS Melting Point > 50 C by Skin
irritation/corrosion Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein
binding alerts for Chromosomal aberration by OASIS v1.1
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as AN2 OR AN2 >> Michael addition
to alpha, beta-unsaturated acids and esters OR AN2 >> Michael addition
to alpha, beta-unsaturated acids and esters >> alpha, beta - Unsaturated
Carboxylic Acids and Esters by Protein binding alerts for Chromosomal
aberration by OASIS v1.1
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not classified by Oncologic
Primary Classification
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acrylamide Reactive Functional
Groups OR Aromatic Amine Type Compounds OR C-Nitroso and Oxime Type
Compounds OR Halogenated Aromatic Hydrocarbon Type Compounds OR
Organophosphorus Type Compounds OR Siloxane Type Compounds by Oncologic
Primary Classification
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Inclusion rules not met by Eye
irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Derivatives of alpha amino
benzene by Eye irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "o"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA alerts for
AMES, MN and CA by OASIS v.1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "p"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as AN2 OR AN2 >> Carbamoylation
after isocyanate formation OR AN2 >> Carbamoylation after isocyanate
formation >> N-Hydroxylamines OR Radical OR Radical >> Radical mechanism
via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS
formation (indirect) >> N-Hydroxylamines OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic
attack after metabolic nitrenium ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic
attack after metabolic nitrenium ion formation >> N-Hydroxylamines by
DNA alerts for AMES, MN and CA by OASIS v.1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "q"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not known precedent reproductive
and developmental toxic potential by DART scheme v.1.0
Domain
logical expression index: "r"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Di-substituted hydrocarbons
(24a) OR Di-substituted hydrocarbons (24c) OR Known precedent
reproductive and developmental toxic potential OR Not covered by current
version of the decision tree OR Organophosphorus compounds (1b) OR
Piperazine-, dioxane-, morpholine-, tetrahydrothiopyran-like derivatives
and cyclohexanamine (17c) by DART scheme v.1.0
Domain
logical expression index: "s"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by
Carcinogenicity (genotox and nongenotox) alerts by ISS
Domain
logical expression index: "t"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic N-nitro group
(Genotox) OR Structural alert for genotoxic carcinogenicity OR
Structural alert for nongenotoxic carcinogenicity OR Substituted
n-alkylcarboxylic acids (Nongenotox) by Carcinogenicity (genotox and
nongenotox) alerts by ISS
Domain
logical expression index: "u"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non-Metals by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "v"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Metalloids by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "w"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
OC1CCNCC1
Threshold=50%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "x"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Stable form by Tautomers unstable
Domain
logical expression index: "y"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Cyanamide form by Tautomers
unstable
Domain
logical expression index: "z"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by in vivo
mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS
Domain
logical expression index: "aa"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as H-acceptor-path3-H-acceptor by
in vivo mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS
Domain
logical expression index: "ab"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic alcohol [-OH] AND
Aliphatic amine [-NH2 or -NH-] AND -CH - [cyclic] AND -CH2-
[cyclic] by Biodegradation fragments (BioWIN MITI)
Domain
logical expression index: "ac"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Cyanide / Nitriles [-C#N] by
Biodegradation fragments (BioWIN MITI)
Domain
logical expression index: "ad"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic alcohol [-OH] AND
Aliphatic amine [-NH2 or -NH-] AND -CH - [cyclic] AND -CH2-
[cyclic] by Biodegradation fragments (BioWIN MITI)
Domain
logical expression index: "ae"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Carbon with 4 single bonds & no
hydrogens by Biodegradation fragments (BioWIN MITI)
Domain
logical expression index: "af"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as High (Class III) by Toxic hazard
classification by Cramer (original) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "ag"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No superfragment by
Superfragments ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "ah"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -0.942
Domain
logical expression index: "ai"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 0.602
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation:
Various studies has been investigated for the test chemica to observe the potential for skin irritation to a greater or lesser extent. The studies are based on in vivo and in vitro experiments in rabbits for target chemical and its functionally similar read across substances.The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolboxdatabasehas also been compared with the experimental data and summarized as below;
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the skin irritation potential was estimated for test chemical.The test chemical is estimated to be irritating to skin of New Zealand White rabbits.
The Henry F. Smyth Jr., Charles P. Carpenter, Carrol S. Well, Urbano C. Pozzani & Jean A. Striegel (1962) carried outacute dermal irritation study offunctionally similar read across substance1-methylpiperazine(CAS No: 109-01-3)in rabbits.Primary skin irritation on rabbits was recorded in a 10-grade ordinal series and was based upon the severest reaction that develops on the clipped abdominal skin of each of five albino rabbits within 24 hours of the uncovered application of 0.01 ml of undiluted sample or of solutions in water, propylene glycol, or acetone. Grade 1 indicates no irritation and Grade 2 the least visible capillary injection from the undiluted chemical. Grade 6 indicates necrosis when undiluted and Grade 10 indicates necrosis from a 0.01% solutionPrimary Irritation score after 24 hours for1-methylpiperazine was Grade 6. Based on this grade,test chemical can be considered moderatelyirritating to rabbit skin.
The above results were further supported by the experimental study conducted by European Chemicals Bureau (2005)in 3 (2 males and 1 female)Weisser Wienerwhite rabbits forfunctionally similar read across substance according to OECD Guideline 404. The rabbits were kept individually and the fur was removed by close clipping at least 15 hours pre dosing. About 500mg of piperazine in a 50% aqueous solution (assumingly piperazine base) was applied to a 6.25 cm2 gauze patch and applied to the skin and covered with a semi-occlusive dressing. After exposure for 4 hours, the test substance was removed, and the skin reaction evaluated after 30-60 minutes, 24, 48 and 72 hours, respectively. Observations at 48 and 72 hours revealedsevere erythema and necrosis in all animals. Hence the test chemical was considered as a strong skin irritant.
The dermal irritation potential of test article was determined according to the OECD 439 test guideline for this study. The MatTek EpiDerm™ model was used to assess the potential dermal irritation of the test article by determining the viability of the tissues following exposure to the test article via MTT. Tissues were exposed to the test article and controls for ~one hour, followed by a 42 hour post-exposure recovery period. The viability of each tissue was determined by MTT assay.The MTT data show the assay quality controls were met and passed the acceptance of criteria.The mean of OD for test chemical was determined to be 1.843 and 0.443 for 3 min. enpoint and 1 hour endpoint,respectively. The Mean % tissue viability compared to negative control (n=3) of the test chemical was determined to be 65.7% and 28.2% for 3 min. enpoint and 1 hour endpoint,respectively.Hence, under the current experimental test conditions it was concluded that test chemical was considered to be non-corrosive to human skin.
Based on the available data for the target as well as it read across substances and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded that test chemical was irritating to skin. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, test chemical can be classified under the category “Category 2”.
Eye Irritation:
In different studies, Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) has been investigated for potential for ocular irritation to a greater or lesser extent.The studies are based on in vivo experiments in rabbits for target chemicalPiperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) and its functionally similar read across substances1-methylpiperazine(CAS No: 109-01-3)andPiperazine (CAS No: 110-85-0).The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental data and summarized as below;
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the eye irritation potential was estimated for test chemicalPiperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) .The chemical Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) is estimated to be irritating to eye of Vienna White rabbits.
The Henry F. Smyth Jr., Charles P. Carpenter, Carrol S. Well, Urbano C. Pozzani & Jean A. Striegel (1962) carried outacute ocular irritation study offunctionally similar read across substance1-methylpiperazine(CAS No: 109-01-3)in rabbits.Eye injury in rabbits was recorded in a 10- grade ordinal series and was based upon the degree of corneal necrosis that results from instillation of various volumes and concentrations of chemical. Grade 1 indicates at most a very small area of necrosis resulting from 0.5 ml of undiluted chemical in the eye. Grade 5 indicates a so-called severe burn from 0.005 ml, and Grade 10 indicates a severe burn from 0.5 ml of a 1% solution in water or propylene glycol.Primary Eye Irritation score after 24 hours for1-methyl piperazinewas Grade 8.Based on the grade, 1-methyl piperazine(CAS No: 109-01-3)was considered to be severely irritating to eyes.
The above results were further supported by the experimental study conducted by IFA (GESTIS) (2017)in 3 (2 males and 1 female)Weisser Wienerwhite rabbits forfunctionally similar read across substancePiperazine (CAS No: 110-85-0).1 drop of the concentrated liquid (5 % solution) was instilled into rabbit eyes and effects were observed.1 drop of the concentrated liquid caused serious damage, which was considered persistent, to rabbits' eyes. Even an only 5 % solution caused damage which was assessed as grade 9 on a scale from 1 to 10. These effects were assessed to be corrosive in nature.Hence it was inferred that 5% or concentrated solution Piperazine causes severe irritation to rabbit eyes.
Based on the available data for the target as well as it read across substances and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded that Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) was irritating to eyes. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, Piperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) can be classified under the category “Category 1”.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The skin and eye irritation potential of test chemicalPiperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1) and its functionally similar read across substanceswere observed in various studies. The results obtained from these studies indicate that the chemicalPiperidin-4-olis likely to cause skin and eye irritation. HencePiperidin-4-ol (CAS No: 5382-16-1)can be classified under the category“Category 2”for skin and“Category 1”eye as per CLP.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.