Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Peer reviewed publication, no guideline followed, basic data covering two strains only

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
lmprovement and Evaluation of High Throughput Fluctuation Ames Test Using 384-well Plate with Salmonella typhimurium TA 100 and TASS
Author:
H. Sui, K. Kawakami, N. Sakurai, T Hara and T. Nohmi
Year:
2009
Bibliographic source:
Genes and Environment, Vol. 31, No. 2 pp. 47-55 (2009)

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
bacterial gene mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Nitrapyrin
EC Number:
217-682-2
EC Name:
Nitrapyrin
Cas Number:
1929-82-4
Molecular formula:
C6H3Cl4N
IUPAC Name:
2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl)pyridine

Method

Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
phenobarbital induced rat liver S-9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
no data
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: Sodium azide, 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide, 2-aminoathracene, 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Two different test methods named were conducted and compared to each other. The first method was referred to as "Ames test" the second method was referred to as "Improved FAT. The "Ames test" is based on the traditional Petri dish method, while the "Improved FAT" is based on a high throughput fluctuation Ames test, which is based on 384 microwell plates instead of the traditional method.
The advantage of the "Improved FAT" is that a much smaller amount of test chemicals is required than the Ames test and can be automated.

Ames test:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min at 37°C
Two plates were used for each dose, and the mean values of the two plates were calculated and used as the number of revertants


Improved FAT:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 90 min at 37°C in a 24 well-plate rotating at 170 rpm. After preincubation, 2.5 mL of the histidine-deficient indicator medium was added to each well of the 24-well plate containing the reaction mixture. Before and after addition of the indicator medium, the
presence of precipitate derived from the chemicals in each weil of the 24-well plate was investigated by the naked eye. An aliquot (50 µL) of the solution (or suspension) in each well of the 24-well plate was transferred into one well of the 384-well plate for final evaluation following an additional incubation step of 72 h at 37°C-


Evaluation criteria:
For the "Ames test" method , the results were judged to be positive when the mean number of revertant colonies was increased dose dependently, and reached twice or more than that of the negative
control.
For the "Improved FAT" method, the results for TA100 were judged to be positive when the percent of positive wells was increased dose dependently, and reached twice or more than that of the negative control. With TA98, the results were judged to be positive when the percent of positive wells was increased dose dependently and reached three times or more than that of the negative control, because the percent of positive wells was low in the negative control.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
ambiguous
Remarks:
A week postive finding was observed for the "Ames test" method.A negative finding was observed for the "Improved FAT" method.
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion