Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-494-2 | CAS number: 83-67-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Test method according to OECD Guideline 471 with deviations. No data on GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 999
- Report date:
- 1999
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- four strains (TA97a, TA100, TA102 and TA104) of S. typhimurium are used.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Theobromine
- EC Number:
- 201-494-2
- EC Name:
- Theobromine
- Cas Number:
- 83-67-0
- Molecular formula:
- C7H8N4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- theobromine
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Theobromine.
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: TA97a, TA100, TA102 and TA104
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1, 5*, 10, 50*, 100, 500*, 1000, 5000, 10000, 20000 µg/plate (*this concentrations were only tested with strains TA102, TA104).
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (NPD)
- Remarks:
- strain TA97a
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminofluoere
- Remarks:
- strain TA97a
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- strain TA100
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminofluorene
- Remarks:
- strain 100
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- cumene hydroperoxide
- Remarks:
- strain TA102
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- other: danthrone
- Remarks:
- strain TA102
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 1 h
- Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Two plates were used for each concentration tested and for both positive and negative controls. All the experiments were repeated once and a total of four plates were analysed for each concentration tested. - Statistics:
- Results of the Ames mutagenicity assay were analysed using an analysis of variance test statistics with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test with control.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Remarks:
- and TA104
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- ambiguous
- Remarks:
- Weak but significant increase in revertant colonies in some concentrations.
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 10,000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Remarks:
- and TA104
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 10,000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Remarks:
- and TA97a
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 10,000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Renner and Munzer and Brusick et al. reported theobromine to be non-mutagenic in Ames mutagenicity assay. Negative results in the present mutagenicity assay in the strains TA97a and TA100 of theobromine fully support the earlier observations of these researchers. Since strains TA102 and TA104 showed very weak mutagenic effects with S9 activation, later on, some more concentrations 5, 50 and 500 µg/plate were also carried out only for these two strains to see whether the mutagenicity was increased in these concentrations. For this reason, the solvent control value presented in the tables for both these two strains was the mean reading of eight plates.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Number of revertants induced by theobromine in Salmonella plate incorporation test using TA97a, TA100, TA102 and TA104 both with or without S9.
-S9= Without metabolic activation.
+S9= With metabolic activation.
Theobromine (µg/plate) |
Number of revertants/plate |
|
-S9a |
+S9a |
|
TA97a |
||
Control (DMSO) |
127±21 |
152±17 |
1 |
130±35 |
157±14 |
10 |
140±18 |
155±12 |
100 |
140±27 |
166±13 |
1000 |
119±9 |
134±11 |
5000 |
129±12 |
128±18 |
10000 |
Toxic |
Toxic |
Positive control |
|
|
NPD (20 µg/plate) |
1098±86 |
|
|
|
1033±66 |
TA100 |
||
Control (DMSO) |
170±13 |
172±11 |
1 |
162±18 |
156±27 |
10 |
168±14 |
167±23 |
100 |
169±35 |
159±20 |
1000 |
154±14 |
150±33 |
5000 |
154±18 |
140±26 |
10000 |
Toxic |
Toxic |
Positive control |
|
|
SA (1.5 µg/plate) |
1240±70 |
|
2-AF (10 µg/plate) |
|
1096±68 |
TA102 |
||
Control (DMSO)b |
316±45 |
340±47 |
1 |
312±39 |
321±44 |
5 |
320±26 |
337±30 |
10 |
302±56 |
375±42 |
50 |
314±38 |
406±60 |
100 |
287±30 |
515±60** |
500 |
319±33 |
396±50 |
1000 |
283±19 |
340±46 |
5000 |
263±34 |
312±28 |
10000 |
Toxic |
282±36 |
20000 |
|
Toxic |
Positive control |
|
|
CH (100 µg/plate) |
1114±65 |
|
DN (30 µg/plate) |
|
1021±27 |
TA104 |
||
Control (DMSO)b |
358±47 |
356±49 |
1 |
349±34 |
366±54 |
5 |
429±48 |
432±44 |
10 |
415±50 |
521±29** |
50 |
402±50 |
460±52* |
100 |
387±86 |
535±42** |
500 |
401±54 |
463±59* |
1000 |
318±44 |
452±91* |
5000 |
317±65 |
370±54 |
10000 |
277±59 |
314±35 |
20000 |
Toxic |
Toxic |
aMean ±S.D. of four plates. Results of each concentration were compared with the solvent control by Dunnett’s multiple comparison with control.
bMean of eight plates.
* p<0.05.
** p<0.01.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The results of Ames mutagenicity assay indicate that theobromine is very weakly mutagenic in bacterial strains TA102 and TA104 with S9 mix. Since none of the number of these revertant colonies in different concentrations of drug treatment was more than double when compared with the revertant colonies of the solvent control, the mutagenicity results may be considered as very weak or non-mutagenic in these strains.
- Executive summary:
- A reverse mutation assay was conducted according to OECD guideline 471 with theobromine. Salmonella typhimurium strains TA97a, T100, TA102 and TA104 were exposed to theobromine at concentrations ranging from 1 to 20000 µg/plate for 48 hours with and without metabolic activation, DMSO was used as the solvent. Positive and solvent controls were included however positive control for TA104 was not available. A total of four plates were used for each test concentration and control. Strains TA102 and TA104 showed very weak mutagenic effect in few concentrations with metabolic activation. Some more concentrations (5, 50 and 500 µg/plate) were included for these strains. Theobromine at different concentrations produced weak but significant increases in revertants colonies in TA 102 and TA104 with metabolic activation. Moreover theobromine was toxic to diverse bacteria strains at 10000 and 20000 µg/plate. The results of Ames mutagenicity assay indicate that theobromine is very weakly mutagenic in bacterial strains TA102 and TA104 with S9 mix. Since none of the number of these revertant colonies in different concentrations of drug treatment was more than double when compared with the revertant colonies of the solvent control, the mutagenicity results may be considered as very weak or non-mutagenic in these strains.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.