Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Sensitisation data (human)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Basic data given

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1977
Report date:
1977
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Report to RIFM
Author:
Kligman AM
Year:
1977
Bibliographic source:
cited in Fragrance raw materials monograph - Prenyl acetate; Food Cosmet. Toxicol.1982; 20, 994

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Study type:
study with volunteers
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Human maximization test according to Kligman AM (1966); J. Invest. Dermatol. 47, 393 – 409
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3-methyl-2-butenyl acetate
EC Number:
214-730-4
EC Name:
3-methyl-2-butenyl acetate
Cas Number:
1191-16-8
Molecular formula:
C7H12O2
IUPAC Name:
3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl acetate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Prenyl Acetate
- Lot/batch No.: RIFM #77-20-400
No addtitional details provided

Method

Type of population:
general
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: 25
- Sex: (12 males, 13 females)
- Age: 18-45
Clinical history:
Healthy (not further specified)
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
Pre-Test: The material was pre-tested on twenty-five subjects in order to determine whether sodium lauryl sulfate pre-treatment was required. A patch of the material was applied to normal sites an the volar forearms or backs for 48 hours under occlusion. No subject had any Irritation from this material and it was decided to use SLS pre-treatment in the test.

Main test: The test material is applied under occlusive dressings to the same site (forearm or scapular back) for five 48-hour periods. Prior to each exposure the site was pretreated with 2.5% aqueous sodium lauryl sulfate under occlusive dressings for a 24-hour period. Following a ten day rest period, a challenge patch of the test material is applied to a different site (scapular back) for a 48-hour period under occlusion. The challenge site is pre-treated for one hour with 5% to 10 % aqueous sodium lauryl sulfate under occlusion. Observations are made immediately after removal of the challenge patch and 24 hours thereafter.

- Concentrations: 20% in petrolatum

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
NO. OF PERSONS WITH/OUT REACTIONS COMPARED TO STUDY POPULATION
- Number of subjects with positive reactions: 0/25
- Number of subjects with negative reactions: 25/25

Applicant's summary and conclusion