Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Based on the three types of in vitro study, the substance is considered to be not mutagenic.

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Target gene:
n/a
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254 induced S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Concentration range in the main test (with metabolic activation): 10 ... 200 µg/ml
Concnetration range in the main test (without metabolic activation): 10 ... 200 µg/ml
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells):
With metabolic activation: 7, 18 and 28 hr
Without metabolic activation: 7, 18 and 28 hr

Second experiment: without metabolic activation: 28 hr
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
Treatment with concentrations higher than 25.0 µg/ml reduced the plating efficiency of the V79 cells. Also the mitotic index was reduced after treatment with the highest scorable concentration at all fixation intervals in the absence of S9-mix. In the presence of S9-mix a reduction was observed at interval 18 hr.
Conclusions:
Negative with and without metabolic activation
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254 induced S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Concentration range in the main test (with metabolic activation): 10 ... 200 µg/ml
Concnetration range in the main test (without metabolic activation): 10 ... 200 µg/ml
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days with and without metabolic activation
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 8 days with and without metabolic activation
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
Treatment with concentrations higher than 25.0 µg/ml reduced the plating efficiency of the V79 cells. Also the mitotic index was reduced after treatment with the highest scorable concentration at all fixation intervals in the absence of S9-mix. In the presence of S9-mix a reduction was observed at interval 18 hr.
Conclusions:
Negative with and without metabolic activation
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Guidelines issued by EA/MHW/MITI (1986) and the Ministry of Labour of Japan
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
bacteria, other: S. Typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, E. Coli WP2 uvrA-
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-mix Rat liver induced with phenobarbital (4 days 0.03-0.06 g/kg BW) and 5,6-benzoflavon (1 day 0.08 g/kg BW)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Concentration range in the main test (with metabolic activation) 10 ... 1250 µg/plate
Concentration range in the main test (without metabolic activation) 10 ... 313 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
Dimethylsulphoxide
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Concentration of the test substance resulting in precipitation: 5000 µg/plate
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid

In this assay the test substnace was specially shielded from UV light during all phases of the study.

Conclusions:
The substance shows no mutagenic tendencies in this assay.
Executive summary:

Limited data provided by ECHA. Not possible to make further conclusions.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data, no classification for genetic toxicity is required for the registered substance.