Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-953-6 | CAS number: 548-62-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
The NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was 30mg/kg bw/day the highest dose tested,while LOAEL for offspring in F3a generation was considered at 5mg/kg bw/day.When male and female Fischer 344 rats were treated with gentian violet (548-62-9) orally.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data from handbook or collection of data
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: As mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The three-generation reproductive toxicity study of Gentian violet was performed in Fischer 344 rats.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Justification for study design:
- No data available
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Gentian violet
- IUPAC name: N-(4-{bis[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]methylene}cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium chloride
- Molecular formula : C25H30N3.Cl
Molecular weight : 407.986 g/mol
- Smiles notation: C(\c1ccc(N(C)C)cc1)(c1ccc(N(C)C)cc1)=C1\C=C\C(=[N+](/C)C)C=C1.[ClH-]
- InChl:1S/C25H30N3.ClH/c1-26(2)22-13-7-19(8-14-22)25(20-9-15-23(16-10-20)27(3)4)21-11-17-24(18-12-21)28(5)6;/h7-18H,1-6H3;1H/q+1;/p-1
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Details on species / strain selection:
- No data available
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- other: Feed
- Details on exposure:
- No data available
- Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage:No data available
- Length of cohabitation: 14 days
- Proof of pregnancy: [vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear] referred to as [day 0 / day 1] of pregnancy:No data available
- After ... days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.No data available
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: [no / yes (explain)]No data available
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): single
- Any other deviations from standard protocol:No data available - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- No data available
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- total:280-294
F0 generation :at least 80days
F1b generation:100-140 days
F2b generation:100-140 days
F3a generation:up to weaning - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Details on study schedule:
- - F1 parental animals not mated until [...] weeks after selected from the F1 litters.
After at lest 80 daysfrom start of study, In F0 generation male and female rats of same dose group were caged together for 14 days for mating .Pups from this mating F1a generation used for separate study while F0 generation animals were mating second times in same dose group following birth of F1b generation
- Selection of parents from F1 generation when pups were [...] days of age.:
At 100-140 days of age, one male and one female from each litter were randomly selected to produce F2a generation. Same procedure was used to produce F2b generation
- Age at mating of the mated animals in the study: [...] weeks
After 100-140 days, F3a generation were produce as result of mating one male and one female animal per litter from F2b generation. - Remarks:
- 0, 5,15 and 30 mg /kg bw /day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Total :450
Control group:180
Male :90
female 90
treated group:270
5mg/kg bw/day:45male and 45 female
15mg/kg bw/day:45male and 45 female
30mg/kg bw/day:45male and 45 female - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- No data available
- Positive control:
- No data available
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: No data
- Time schedule:
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
- Time schedule:
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations:
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No data
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
- Time schedule for examinations:
OTHER:No data - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- No data available
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- No data available
- Litter observations:
- STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: [yes/no]: No data available
- If yes, maximum of [...] pups/litter ([...]/sex/litter as nearly as possible); for F1b and F2a generation one male and one female from each litter were seleted and 2 male and 2 female per litter for F3a generation were selected excess pups were killed and discarded.
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in [F1 / F2 / F3] offspring:yes
[number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, were observed
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
[no / yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was/was not determined for pups born or found dead.]No data available
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY:No data available
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL IMMUNOTOXICITY:No data available - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals [describe when, e.g. as soon as possible after the last litters in each generation were produced.]No data available
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals [describe when, e.g. after the last litter of each generation was weaned.] No data available
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of [external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.]No data available
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The tissues indicated in Table [#] were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively.: yes in F3a generations were observed - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring not selected as parental animals and all F2 offspring were sacrificed at [#?] days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic and/or microscopic examination) as follows: No data available
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of [external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.]No data available
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGTHS
The tissues indicated in Table [#] were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively. yes in F3a generation - Statistics:
- No data available
- Reproductive indices:
- No data available
- Offspring viability indices:
- No data available
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- No dose related effect on mortality was observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The dose related effect in body weight was observed at dose 30mg/kg bw /day group compared to control and lower dose group.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No effect observed on fertility index and stillborn animals ,sex ratio, number of pups per litter .
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effect observed on reproductive performance
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- not dose related mortality was observed,
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The dose related effect in body weight was observed at dose 30mg/kg bw /day group compared to control and lower dose group
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Neuropathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No effect observed on fertility index and stillborn animals ,sex ratio, number of pups per litter .
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effect observed on reproductive performace
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Sexual maturation:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No dose related effects on incidence of gross deformities were noted
- Histopathological findings:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- other: F2b
- Effect level:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: gross deformities
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effect observed at dose 30mg/kg bw
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Sexual maturation:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Histopatological finding: Dose related trend for focal dilatation of the renal cortex and tubules ,for necrosis of the thymus and inverse dose-response relationship for red pulp haematopoietic cell proliferation of the spleen
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Generation:
- other: F3a
- Effect level:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Remarks on result:
- other: Dose related effect observed
- Critical effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Organ:
- kidney
- spleen
- thymus
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- no
- Conclusions:
- The NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was 30mg/kg bw/day the highest dose tested,while LOAEL for offspring in F3a generation was considered at 5mg/kg bw/day.When male and female Fischer 344 rats were treated with gentian violet (548-62-9) orally.
- Executive summary:
In three generation reproductive toxicity study, Total 450 male and female Fischer 344 rats were used in the study separated in two group i.e. control group and treated group.90 animals of each sex were used in control group. gentian violet (548-62-9) was given in feed at dose concentration 0, 5, 15 and 30 mg /kg bw /day.45 animals of each sex were used for each dose concentration in F0 generation.
In F0 generation male and female rats of same dose group were caged together for 14 days for mating .Pups from this mating F1ageneration used for separate study while F0 generation animals were mating second times in same dose group following birth of F1bgeneration. At 100-140 days of age, one male and one female from each litter were randomly selected to produce F2ageneration. Same procedure was used to produce F2bgeneration .After 100-140 days, F3a generation were produce as result of mating one male and one female animal per litter from F2b generation. Pups from all generations were examined for gross deformities while at weaning, 2male and 2 female per litter of F3a generation were randomly selected for histopathology of organs and tissues.
The dose related effect in body weight was observed at dose 30mg/kg bw /day dose group, as animals in this group had lower body weight compared to control and lower dose group. No dose related effects were observed on reproductive performance as number of pups per litter, fertility index and numbers of stillborn animals were not affected across the generation or dose group.Also No dose related effects were observed on gross deformities in each generation.
The only significant histopathological changes noted in F3ageneration were dose related trend for focal dilation of renal cortex and tubules and statistically significant dose related trend for necrosis of thymus (p<0.012 for male and p<0.0001 for female).Also statistically significant inverse dose response relationship for red pulp hematopoietic cell proliferation of spleen (p<0.001 for male and p<0.00001 for female).
Hence the NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was 30mg/kg bw/day the highest dose tested. While LOAEL for offspring in F3a generation w as considered at 5mg/kg bw/day when male and female Fischer 344 rats were treated with gentian violet (548-62-9) orally.
Reference
Mortality : not dose related mortality was observed,
Body weight and food consumption: The dose related effect in body weight was observed at dose 30mg/kg bw /day group compared to control and lower dose group.
Test substance intake:No data available
Reproductive function: estrous cycle:No effect observed
Reproductive function: sperm measures:No data available
Reproductive performance:No effect observed on fertility index and stillborn animals ,sex ratio, number of pups per litter .
Organ weights:No data available
Gross pathology:No data available
Histopathology:No data available
other findings:No data available
Mortality : not dose related mortality was observed,
Body weight and food consumption: The dose related effect in body weight was observed at dose 30mg/kg bw /day group compared to control and lower dose group
Test substance intake:No data available
Reproductive function: estrous cycle:No effect observed
Reproductive function: sperm measures:No data available
Reproductive performance:No effect observed on fertility index and stillborn animals ,sex ratio, number of pups per litter .
Organ weights:No data available
Gross pathology:No data available
Histopathology:No data available
other findings:No data available
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is K4 and from secondary source
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Reproductive toxicity
In different studies,N-(4-{bis[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]methylene}cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium chloride (548-62-9)has been investigated for reproductive toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments i.e. most commonly in rats for Gentian violet (548-62-9).
In experimental study given by FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA)( FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA),Page no.3-34,2004) IIn three generation reproductive toxicity study, Total 450 male and female Fischer 344 rats were used in the study separated in two group i.e. control group and treated group.90 animals of each sex were used in control group. gentian violet (548-62-9) was given in feed at dose concentration 0, 5, 15 and 30 mg /kg bw /day.45 animals of each sex were used for each dose concentration in F0 generation.In F0 generation male and female rats of same dose group were caged together for 14 days for mating .Pups from this mating F1ageneration used for separate study while F0 generation animals were mating second times in same dose group following birth of F1bgeneration. At 100-140 days of age, one male and one female from each litter were randomly selected to produce F2ageneration. Same procedure was used to produce F2bgeneration .After 100-140 days, F3a generation were produce as result of mating one male and one female animal per litter from F2b generation. Pups from all generations were examined for gross deformities while at weaning, 2male and 2 female per litter of F3a generation were randomly selected for histopathology of organs and tissues.The dose related effect in body weight was observed at dose 30mg/kg bw /day dose group, as animals in this group had lower body weight compared to control and lower dose group. No dose related effects were observed on reproductive performance as number of pups per litter, fertility index and numbers of stillborn animals were not affected across the generation or dose group.Also No dose related effects were observed on gross deformities in each generation.The only significant histopathological changes noted in F3ageneration were dose related trend for focal dilation of renal cortex and tubules and statistically significant dose related trend for necrosis of thymus (p<0.012 for male and p<0.0001 for female).Also statistically significant inverse dose response relationship for red pulp hematopoietic cell proliferation of spleen (p<0.001 for male and p<0.00001 for female). Hence the NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was 30mg/kg bw/day the highest dose tested.While LOAEL for offspringin F3a generationw as considered at 5mg/kg bw/day when male and female Fischer 344 rats were treated with gentian violet (548-62-9) orally.
It is supported by experimental study given by NTP (National Centre for Toxicological Research, TER82080 (study conducted in 1981-82).The reproductive and developmental toxicity study of Gentian violet (548-62-9) was performed in female New Zealand white rabbits. Total 133 animals used for study in which 30 female animals in control group. The doses were selected base upon preliminary toxicity study. All the animals provided with food and water ad libitum. Gentian violet was dissolved in distilled water in concentrations of 0, 0.5,1. 0 and 2.0 mg/ml for the conventional teratology study. Dosing solutions were stored at 5°C except at the time of dosing when they were warmed to room temperature, and stirred continuously with a magnetic stirrer and analytical verification done using spectrophotometry.
Artificially inseminated rabbits were used .Timed-pregnant CD rats were given gentian violet at dose levels of 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg/day in distilled water. Dams were weighed on gestational days 0, 6-19 (prior to daily dosing) and 30 (immediately prior to sacrifice), and were also observed for clinical signs of toxicity. At sacrifice on gestational day 30, dams were evaluated for body weight, liver weight, gravid uterine weight and status of uterine implantation sites (i.e., implantation sites, resorptions, dead fetuses, live fetuses). Live fetuses were dissected from the uterus and evaluated for live litter size, body weights, sex ratios and gross morphological abnormalities.All live fetuses were examined for visceral malformations employing the Staples' fresh tissue dissection method. Half of the fetuses were decapitated immediately after dissection and the heads were fixed in Bouin's solution for free hand sectioning and examination (Wilson's Technique). All fetal carcasses were cleared and stained with Alizarin Red S and examined for skeletal malformations.
The maternal mortality in the present study was 22.6% (7/31 does) in the 2mg/kg bw dose group, 15.4% (4/26) in the 1mg/kg bw dose group, 7.4% (2/27) in the0. 5mg/kg bw dose group and 0.0 (0/27) in the control group. A significant trend was seen toward reduction in maternal body weight on gestational day 19 (end of dosing), and in maternal weight gain (gestational period and treatment period). For maternal weight gain, all GV-exposed groups were significantly lower than for controls for both treatment and gestation period. Clinical signs, seen in a dose-related manner, included wheezing, diarrhea, congestion, wet nose, dyspnea, lacrimation, and anorexia and cyanosis (the latter two in those does which died). All GV-exposed groups exhibited a significant increase in the number of implantation sites per litter versus controls. Percentage of resorptions per litter and number of litters with resorptions, as well as the percentage of non-live (dead plus resorbed) and affected (non- live plus malformed) per litter exhibited a dose-related upward trend, but no significant pairwise comparisons. For live litters, the number of fetuses (male and/or female) per litter did not differ among dose groups. Average fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant downward trend with all dose group values significantly lower than controls. When separated by sex, only female fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant downward trend and pairwise comparisons. There were no significant dose-related effects on the incidence of gross, visceral or skeletal malformations per litter, or in the number (or percent) of fetuses, males or females, malformed per litter nor in the number or percent of litters with malformed fetuses. Examination of malformation incidence by category indicated no malformations unique to or with a higher incidence in any of the GV-exposed groups relative to control. No evidence of reproductive and developmental toxicity of gentian violet was seen when administered by gavage to pregnant NZW rabbits during organogenesis at doses which produced evidence of maternal and fetal mortality and toxicity. Hence NOAEL for maternal toxicity and fetal toxicity was considered to be 2mg/kg bw /day i.e highest tested dose. WhenNew Zealand white rabbits were treated with Gentian violet (548-62-9) orally.
Also In another experimental study given by National Center for Toxicological Research,( NTP: TER82079 (1981)) The reproductive and developmental toxicity study of Gentian violet (548-62-9) was performed in female Charles River CD rat. Total 125 animals used for study in which 32 female animals in control group. The doses were selected base upon preliminary toxicity study. All the animals provided with food and water ad libitum. Gentian violet was dissolved in distilled water in concentrations of 0, 0.5,1. 0 and 2.0 mg/ml for the conventional teratology study. Dosing solutions were stored at 5°C except at the time of dosing when they were warmed to room temperature, and stirred continuously with a magnetic stirrer and analytical verification done using spectrophotometry.
Timed-pregnant CD rats were given gentian violet at dose levels of 0.0, 2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg/day in distilled water by gavage on gestational days 6 through 15.For proof ofpregnancyexamined vaginal smear for the presence of sperm and it considered as GD 0.Dams were weighed on gestational days 0, 6-15 (prior to daily dosing) and 20 (immediately following sacrifice), and were also observed for clinical signs of toxicity. At sacrifice on gestational day 20, dams were evaluated for body weight, liver weight, gravid uterine weight and status of uterine implantation sites (i.e., implantation sites, resorptions, dead fetuses, live fetuses). Live fetuses were dissected from the uterus and evaluated for live litter size, body weights, sex ratios and gross morphological abnormalities.All live fetuses were examined for visceral malformations employing the Staples' fresh tissue dissection method. Half of the fetuses were decapitated prior to dissection and the beads were fixed in Bouin's solution for free hand sectioning and examination (Wilson's Technique). All fetal carcasses were cleared and stained with Alizarin Red S and examined for skeletal malformations.
The maternal mortality rate in the present study was 9.4% (3/32dams) in the 10 mg/kg bw dose group; all other dams from all dose groups survived to terminal sacrifice on gestational day (gd) 20. A significant trend for reduced maternal body weight was found on gd 11 and 15 with the value for the 10 mg/kg bw dose group significantly different from controls on gd 11. A significant trend toward reductions in maternal weight gain for the gestation period, treatment period and absolute weight gain (weight gain during gestation minus gravid uterine weight) were found with the values for these three parameters in the 10mg/kg bw dose group significantly below those of control. Weight gain during the treatment period was also significantly reduced in the 10mg/kg bw dose group versus controls.
Clinical signs of toxicity presented a dose-response pattern, and included the weight loss of more than 5 grams in 24 hours ,wheezing, lethargy, weakness, diarrhea, lacrimation and rough coat. There were no dose-related differences observed in the reproductive measures as number of implantation sites per litter; number or percent of resorptions, fetal deaths or non-live (dead plus resorptions) per litter. Among live litters, the number of live fetuses per litter, number or percent males per litter, average fetal body weight, average male or female fetal body weight per litter were also unaffected by treatment. There was a significant trend toward an increased number and percent affected (non-live plus malformed) per litter with dose; the number of litters with affected fetuses was significantly elevated in the 10mg/kg bw dose group versus controls.
There were no gross malformations observed in any dose group in the study. Major visceral malformations observed included hydronephrosis (left or right) and hydroureter (unilaterally or bilaterally) with some fetuses exhibiting both malformations. Skeletal defects observed consisted mainly of short rib involving the thirteenth rib uni- or bilaterally. When incidences of all malformations were analyzed, there was a significant trend across dose groups toward increased number and percentage of fetuses, males, and females malformed per litter. In pairwise comparisons, the number and percentage of fetuses malformed per litter was significantly elevated in the 10mg/kg bw dose group versus controls as was the number of litters with malformed fetuses.
Gentian violet caused an increase in hydroureter, hydronephrosis and short ribs, the incidence being significant only in the 10mg/kg bw dose group. These malformations were accompanied by signs of maternal toxicity i.e. reduction in maternal weight on gd 11, maternal weight gain during gestation and treatment periods, absolute weight gain and clinical signs. There was no significant incidence of malformations in the lower dose groups, in the absence of maternal toxicity (2.5mg/kg bw ) or in the presence of limited maternal toxicity (5mg/kg bw ). Hence, NOAEL for maternal toxicity was considered to be 2.5 mg/kg bw/day and for embryo or fatal toxicity was considered to be 5mg/kg bwday based on fetal effect seen in conjunction with maternal toxicity at 10mg/kg bw/day
Based on the above study on ,N-(4-{bis[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]methylene}cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium chloride (548-62-9)it can be concluded that The NOAEL for reproductive toxicity was 30mg/kg bw/day the highest dose tested. When male and female Fischer 344 rats were treated with gentian violet (548-62-9) orally.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
The NOAEL value of Gentian violet in parent New Zealand white rabbits were considered to be 0.5mg/kg/day and for F1 generation was 2 mg/kg/day as no maternal toxicity and Foetal malformations were observed.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data from experimental study report
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: As mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Teratogenicity of Gentian Violet (CAS No. 548-62-9) in New Zealand White Rabbits was evaluated following maternal exposure
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Gentian violet
- IUPAC name: N-(4-{bis[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]methylene}cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium chloride
- Molecular formula : C25H30N3.Cl
Molecular weight : 407.986 g/mol
- Smiles notation: C(\c1ccc(N(C)C)cc1)(c1ccc(N(C)C)cc1)=C1\C=C\C(=[N+](/C)C)C=C1.[ClH-]
- InChl:1S/C25H30N3.ClH/c1-26(2)22-13-7-19(8-14-22)25(20-9-15-23(16-10-20)27(3)4)21-11-17-24(18-12-21)28(5)6;/h7-18H,1-6H3;1H/q+1;/p-1
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Details on test animal & Environmental conditions
TEST ANIMALS
- Source:Dutchland Laboratory Animals, Inc. (Denver, PA)
- Age at study initiation:approximately six months 14 days.
- Weight at study initiation:Female : 3.5-4.6 kg
- Housing:stainless steel cages with mesh flooring Minimum cage dimensions were 18" x 24" x 18" and maximum cage dimensions were 24" x 24" x
20".
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):Purina Certified Rabbit Chow ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):deionized/filtered water ad libitum
- Acclimation period:14days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):16.66-22.22°C
- Humidity (%):57.13 ± 2.86%
- Air changes (per hr):No data avaliable
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12 hr
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Gentian violet was dissolved in distilled water in concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/mlmg/ml for the conventional teratology study.
Dosing solutions were stored at 5°C except at the time of dosing when they were warmed to room temperature, and stirred continuously with a magnetic stirrer - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- by spectrophotometry
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes,by spectrophotometry
- Details on mating procedure:
- Artificially inseminated rabbits
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 13 days i.e. Gestational days 6 through 19
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Duration of test:
- 30 days
- Remarks:
- 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Total:133
0.0mg/kg : 30
0.5mg/kg: 32
1.0mg/kg: 31
2.0mg/kg: 40 - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The doses were selected based on the pilot study
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS:No data available
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: on gestational days 0, 6-19
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations:Dams were weighed on gestational days 0, 6-19 (prior to daily dosing) and 30 (immediatelyprior to sacrifice)
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): No data
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No data
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
- Time schedule for examinations:
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day # :sacrifice on gestational day 30,
- Organs examined: liver weight, gravid uterine weight and status of uterine implantation sites (i.e., implantation sites, resorptions, dead fetuses, live fetuses).
OTHER: - Ovaries and uterine content:
- No data available The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other: - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes:Live fetuses were dissected from the uterus and evaluated for live litter size, body weights, sex ratios and gross morphological abnormalities.
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: All live fetuses were examined for visceral malformations employing the Staples' fresh tissue dissection method.
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: All fetal carcasses were cleared and stained with Alizarin Red S and examined for skeletal malformations.
- Head examinations: Yes: half per litter :Half of the fetuses were decapitated prior to dissection and theheads were fixed in Bouin's solution for free hand sectioning and examination (Wilson's Technique). - Statistics:
- ANOVA was performed on selected response variables 30 employing General Linear Hodel (GLH) procedures for the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) Library .Prior to GLM analysis, the arcsine-square root transformation was performed on all maternal or litter-derived percentage data (Snedecor and Cochran, 1967), and Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance (alpha level =0.001) (Winer, 1962) was performed on all data to be analyzed by GLM.The statistical tests that were performed on each parameter are described in Appendix II (protocol), Amendment II, Table 2 and Amendment1. Two dependent variables (i.e. average fetal body weight per litter, and percent malformed fetuses per litter), were analyzed in a three-way(dose x replicate x sex) ANOVA design with sex as a repeated measure within each litter. When either of these variables showed a significant (p<0.05) interaction between sex and dose as tested against the general error term, the data for that variable were examined separately for eachsex in a two-way (dose x replicate) design. When either variable showed a nonsignificant (p>0.05) dose x sex interaction.
- Indices:
- No data available
- Historical control data:
- Yes. -- Historical data on 1142 New Zealand White rabbit control matings have been summarized across 75 teratology studies from pharmaceutical companies or biological research organizations by the Middle Atlantic Reproduction and Teratology Association
(Woo and Hoar, 1982) - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Clinical signs were taken daily during the dosing period (gd 6 through 19), and at necropsy (gd 30). The following symptoms were seen in does in a dose-related manner: wheezing, diarrhea, congestion, wet nose, dyspnea, lacrimation, and anorexia and cyanosis (the latter two in those which died).
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- Maternal mortality followed a clear dose-response trend with seven deaths (out of 31 retained in the study, 22.6%) in the 2.0 mg/kg/day dose group, four deaths (out of 26 retained in the study, 15.4%) in the 1.0 mg/k/day dose group and two deaths (out of 27 retained in the study, 7.4%) in the 0.5 mg/kg/day dose group. No deaths occurred in the control group (out of 27 does retained in the study).
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- A number of weight related parameters also indicated maternal toxicity. There was a significant downward trend for maternal body weight on gd 19 (at the end of the dosing period), and maternal weight gain (gestation period and treatment period).Significant pairwise comparisons were present only for maternal weight gain, where all gentian violet-exposed groups were significantly lower than controls for this parameter for the gestation period and treatment period.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no treatment- related effects on gravid uterine weight, liver weight or relative liver weight.
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Neuropathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Details on results:
- Clinical signs and mortality
Clinical signs: in a dose-related manner, included wheezing, diarrhea, congestion, wet nose, dyspnea, lacrimation, and anorexia and cyanosis (the latter two in those does which died).
Mortality: The maternal mortality in the present study was 22.6% (7/31 does) in the 2 mg/kg bw dose group, 15.4% (4/26) in the 1 mg/kg bw dose group, 7.4% (2/27) in the 0.5 mg/kg bw dose group and 0.0 (0/27) in the control group.
Dermal irritation: No data
Body weight and weight gain: There was a significant downward trend for maternal body weight on gd 19
Food consumption and compound intake: No data
Food efficiency: No data
Water consumption and compound intake: No data
Opthalmoscopic examination: No data
Haematology: No data available
Clinical chemistry: No data available
Urinanalysis: No data available
Neurobehaviour: No data
Organ weights: There were no treatment- related effects on gravid uterine weight, liver weight or relative liver weight.
Gross pathology: No data available
Histopathology: No data available - Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no treatment related effects on the number or percent of dead conceptuses per litter. There was a significant upward trend in the percentage of non-live (dead plus resorbed) and affected (non-live plus malformed) conceptuses per liter but no significant pairwise comparisons
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Examination of reproductive parameters indicated a significant increase in the number of implantation sites per litter in all compound-exposed groups versus controls. Percent resorptions per litter and number of litters with resorptions exhibited a dose-related upward trend but no significant pairwise comparisons
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Percent resorptions per litter and number of litters with resorptions exhibited a dose-related upward trend but no significant pairwise comparisons
- Early or late resorptions:
- not specified
- Dead fetuses:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- For litters with one or more live fetuses (i.e “live litters") the number of fetuses (male and/or female) did not differ among dose groups.
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not specified
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): not specified - Changes in number of pregnant:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 2 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical signs
- maternal abnormalities
- mortality
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Average fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant dose-related downward trend with values from all gentian violet exposed groups significantly lower than from controls. When separated by sex, only the female foetuses exhibited the significant pairwise comparisons
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): no effects observed
Field "Description (incidence and severity)" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.DescriptionIncidenceAndSeverityFetalPupBodyWeightChanges): Average fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant dose-related downward trend with values from all gentian violet exposed groups significantly lower than from controls. When separated by sex, only the female foetuses exhibited the significant pairwise comparisons - Reduction in number of live offspring:
- not specified
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- For litters with one or more live fetuses (i.e “live litters") the number of fetuses (male and/or female) did not differ among dose groups
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- not specified
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not specified
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no significant dose-related effects on incidence of gross malformations per litter, nor in the number (or percent) of males, females or foetuses malformed per litter, nor in the number or percent of litters with malformed fetuses
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no significant dose-related effects on incidence of skeletal malformations per litter, nor in the number (or percent) of males, females or foetuses malformed per litter, nor in the number or percent of litters with malformed fetuses
- Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no significant dose-related effects on incidence of visceral malformations per litter, nor in the number (or percent) of males, females or foetuses malformed per litter, nor in the number or percent of litters with malformed fetuses
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Fetal body weight changes: When separated by sex, only female fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant downward trend and pairwise comparisons. When separated by sex, only female fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant downward trend and pairwise comparisons.
Reduction in no of live offspring: The number of fetuses (male and/or female) per litter did not differ among dose groups
Changes in sex ratio: no effects observed
Fetal/pup body weight changes: Average fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant downward trend with all dose group values significantly lower than controls.
Changes in litter size and weight: no effects observed
Changes in postnatal survival: no effects observed
External malformation: no effects observed
Skeletal malformation: no effects observed
Visceral malformation: no effects observed
Other effect: No data available - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 2 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- changes in sex ratio
- changes in litter size and weights
- changes in postnatal survival
- external malformations
- skeletal malformations
- visceral malformations
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 2 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- no
- Relation to maternal toxicity:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- NOAEL for maternal toxicity and fetal toxicity was considered to be 2mg/kg bw /day i.e highest tested dose. When New Zealand white rabbits were treated with Gentian violet (548-62-9) orally.
- Executive summary:
The teratogenicity study of Gentian violet (548-62-9) was performed in femaleNew Zealand white rabbits. Total 133 animals used for study in which 30 female animals in control group. The doses were selected base upon preliminary toxicity study. All the animals provided with food and water adlibitum.Gentian violet was dissolved in distilled water in concentrations of 0, 0.5,1. 0 and 2.0 mg/ml for the conventional teratology study. Dosing solutions were stored at 5°C except at the time of dosing when they were warmed to room temperature, and stirred continuously with a magnetic stirrer and analytical verification done using spectrophotometry.
Artificially inseminated rabbits were used .Timed-pregnant CD rats were given gentian violet at dose levels of 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg/day in distilled water. Dams were weighed on gestational days 0, 6-19 (prior to daily dosing) and 30 (immediately prior to sacrifice), and were also observed for clinical signs of toxicity. At sacrifice on gestational day 30, dams were evaluated for body weight, liver weight, gravid uterine weight and status of uterine implantation sites (i.e., implantation sites, resorptions, dead fetuses, live fetuses). Live fetuses were dissected from the uterus and evaluated for live litter size, body weights, sex ratios and gross morphological abnormalities.All live fetuses were examined for visceral malformations employing the Staples' fresh tissue dissection method. Half of the fetuses were decapitated immediately after dissection and the heads were fixed in Bouin's solution for free hand sectioning and examination (Wilson's Technique). All fetal carcasses were cleared and stained with Alizarin Red S and examined for skeletal malformations.
The maternal mortality in the present study was 22.6% (7/31 does) in the 2mg/kg bw dose group, 15.4% (4/26) in the 1mg/kg bw dose group, 7.4% (2/27) in the0. 5mg/kg bw dose group and 0.0 (0/27) in the control group. A significant trend was seen toward reduction in maternal body weight on gestational day 19 (end of dosing), and in maternal weight gain (gestational period and treatment period). For maternal weight gain, all GV-exposed groups were significantly lower than for controls for both treatment and gestation period. Clinical signs, seen in a dose-related manner, included wheezing, diarrhea, congestion, wet nose, dyspnea, lacrimation, and anorexia and cyanosis (the latter two in those does which died). All GV-exposed groups exhibited a significant increase in the number of implantation sites per litter versus controls. Percentage of resorptions per litter and number of litters with resorptions, as well as the percentage of non-live (dead plus resorbed) and affected (non- live plus malformed) per litter exhibited a dose-related upward trend, but no significant pairwise comparisons. For live litters, the number of fetuses (male and/or female) per litter did not differ among dose groups. Average fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant downward trend with all dose group values significantly lower than controls. When separated by sex, only female fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant downward trend and pairwise comparisons.
There were no significant dose-related effects on the incidence of gross, visceral or skeletal malformations per litter, nor in the number (or percent) of fetuses, males or females, malformed per litter nor in the number or percent of litters with malformed fetuses. Examination of malformation incidence by category indicated no malformations unique to or with a higher incidence in any of the GV-exposed groups relative to control. No evidence of teratogenicity of gentian violet was seen when administered by gavage to pregnant NZW rabbits during organogenesis at doses which produced evidence of maternal and fetal mortality and toxicity. Hence NOAEL for maternal toxicity and fetal toxicity was considered to be 2mg/kg bw /day i.e highest tested dose. When New Zealand white rabbits were treated with Gentian violet (548-62-9) orally.
Reference
Assignment of CD Rats in Replicate and Dose Groups in the Teratological Evaluation of Gentian Violet
|
Gentian Violet (mg/kg/day, po) |
|||
Replicate |
0.0 |
2.5 |
5 |
10 |
I |
14 |
13 |
14 |
14 |
II |
18 |
17 |
17 |
18 |
Total Treated |
32 |
30 |
31 |
32 |
Summary of Analysis of Teratological Defects Observed in CD Rat Fetuses Following Maternal Exposure to Various Dose Levels of Gentian Violet by Oral Gavage on Gestational Days 6 Through 15
|
Gentian Violet (mg/kg/day, po) |
|||
|
0 |
2.5 |
5 |
10 |
fetuses examineda |
264 |
299 |
264 |
235 |
litter examinedb |
25 |
26 |
24 |
22 |
Gross malformations per litterc |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Visceral malformations |
|
|
|
0 |
Foetusesc |
0 |
2 |
1 |
5f |
Litterd |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
Skeletal malformations |
|
|
|
|
Foetusesc |
1 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
Litterd |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
Fetuses malformed per litterc |
0.04 ±0.04 |
0.15 ±0.09 |
0.25 ±0.14 |
0.45** ±0.14 |
Percent fetuses malformed per litterc |
0.31 ±0.31 |
1.50 ±0.86 |
1.91 ±1.02 |
6.70** ±2.70 |
No. d fetuses malformed |
1 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
Percent fetuses malformedd |
0.4 |
1.3 |
2.3 |
4.3 |
No. litters with malformationse |
1 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
Percent litters with malformationse |
4.0 |
11.5 |
18.7 |
36.4 |
Males malformed per litterc |
0.04h ±0.04 |
0.08h ±0.06 |
0.09h ±0.06 |
0.29h ±0.12 |
Females malformed per litterc |
0.0 |
1.41 0.98 |
2.56 1.53 |
8.30 5.00 |
Percent males malformed per litterc |
0.52 ±0.52 |
1.20 ±0.88 |
1.24 ±0.86 |
4.54 ±1.95 |
Percent females malformed per litterC |
0.0 |
1.41 ±0.98 |
2.56 ±1.53 |
8.30 ±5.00 |
aOnly live fetuses were examined for malformations.
blncludes only litters with live feluses.
cfetuses with one or more malformations.
dLitters with one or more malformed fetuses.
eReported as mean + S.E.H. for all live litters.
fOne litter ofhead(7) was lost.
gOne fetus was lost during staining process.
hOne litter had no male fetuses:
iOne litter had no female fetuses.
jTwolitter. had no female fetuse
§p<0.05 Jonckheere's Test.
§§p<0.01Jonckheere's Test.
*p<0.05 Kruskal-Wallis.
**p<0.01 Mann-Whitney U.
***p<0.05 Fisher's Exact Test.
Specific Teratological Defects Observed Following Maternal Exposure to Various Dose Levels of Gentian Violet by Oral Gavage on Gestational Days 6 Through 15
|
Gentian Violet (mg/kg/day, po) |
|||
|
00 |
2.5 |
5.0 |
10 |
Total fetuses examinedb |
264 |
299 |
264 |
235 |
Total litters examinedc |
25 |
26 |
24 |
22 |
GROSS MALFORMATIONS f |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
VISCERAL MALFORMATIONSg |
|
|
|
|
Hydronephrosis: left |
|
1 |
|
|
right |
|
|
|
2 |
Hydroureter: bilateral |
|
|
|
1 |
right |
|
|
|
2 |
left |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
Extra liver lobe |
|
|
|
1 |
SKELETAL Malformations |
|
|
|
|
Lumbar centra misaligned |
|
|
1 |
|
Thnracic centra off center |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Short rib |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
Missing ribf |
|
|
1 |
|
VARIATIONSf,g,h |
|
|
|
|
Hematoma: jaw |
|
1 |
|
|
neck |
1 |
|
|
|
lower limb |
1 |
|
|
|
back |
|
1 |
|
|
No. innominate |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
wavy rib |
3 |
|
|
|
Misaligned sternebrae |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
Extra ossification sites - |
|
6 |
|
|
spinal cord and tail |
|
|
|
|
Doubled centra |
|
5 |
3 |
1 |
Clubbed limb w/o bone change |
|
|
1 |
|
Bilateral papilla 1/4 normalsize or less |
1 |
|
|
1 |
Left papilla 1/4 normalsize or less |
|
|
|
1 |
Right papilla 1/4 normalsize or less |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
Very soft tissue - kidney |
|
1 |
|
|
Incomplete ossification |
|
1 |
1 |
|
Distended ureter(s) |
21 |
18 |
8 |
15 |
aA single fetus may have more than one malformation or variation,
bAll live fetuses were examined for gross malformations.
cAll live fetuses were examined for visceral malformations of the trunk. Fifty percent of the heads were examined for soft tissue malformations.
dFifty percent decapitated carcasses and50%fetal preparations with heads intact were examined for skeletal malformations.
eThirteenth rib was two-thirds or less normal length, unilaterally or bilaterally.
fone fetus had both twelfth and thirteenth ribs missing.
Reproductive Parameters after Exposure of Pregnant CD Rats to Various Dose Levels of Gentian Violet by Oral Gavage on Gestational Days 6 Through 15
|
Gentian Violet (mg/kg/day, po) |
|||
|
0.0 |
2.5 |
5.0 |
10 |
ALL LITTERSa |
|
|
|
|
(Pregnant Dams) |
25 |
26 |
24 |
25 |
Implantation sites per 1itterb |
11.48 ±0.70 |
12.35 ±0.53 |
11.50 ±0.86 |
11.52 ±0.77 |
Resorptions per litterb |
0.92 ±0.38 |
0.85 ±0.51 |
0.50 ±0.17 |
2.12 ±0.93 |
Percent Resorptions per litterb |
9.3 ±3.8 |
5.6 ±3.1 |
5.4 ±2.1 |
17.5 ±6.6 |
No. Litters with resorptions |
8 |
7 |
8 |
11 |
Percent litters with resorptions |
32.0 |
26.9 |
33.3 |
44.0f |
Dead per litterb |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Percent dead per litterb |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
No. Litters with dead |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Percent Litters with dead |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0Non-live per litterb,c |
0.92 ±0.38 |
0.85 ±0.51 |
0.50 ±0.17
|
2.12 ±0.93 |
Percent non-live per litterb, c |
9.3 ±3.8 |
5.8 ±3.1
|
5.4 ±2.1 |
17.5 ±6.6 |
No. litters with non-live |
8 |
7 |
8 |
11 |
Percent litters with non-live |
32.0 |
26.9 |
33.3 |
44.0 |
Affected per 1itterb ,d |
0.96 ±0.39 |
1.00 ±0.51 |
0.75 ±0.21
|
2.52 ±0.91 |
Percent affected per litterb |
9.5 ±3.8 |
7.2 ±3.2 |
7.2 ±2.3
|
22.3 ±6.7 |
No. litters with affected |
8 |
9 |
11 |
17 |
Percent litters with affected |
32.0 |
34.6 |
45.8 |
68.0 |
LIVE LITTERSe |
|
|
|
|
(No. litters with live fetuses) |
25 |
26 |
24 |
22 |
Live fetuses per litterb |
10.56 ±0.85 |
11.50 ±0.59 |
11.00 ±0.89 |
10.68 ±0.82 |
Males per litterb |
5.56 ±0.57 |
6.04 ±0.53 |
5.25 ±0.49
|
5.18 ±0.52 |
Percent males per litterb |
53.1 ±4.2 |
52.0 ±3.9
|
50.2 ±4.5 |
48.2 ±3.9 |
Average fetal body weight (g) per litter |
3.686 ±0.077 |
3.642 ±0.059 |
3.486 ±0.072 |
3.606 ±0.090 |
Average male fetal body weight (g) per litter |
3.741 ±0.078 |
3.688 ±0.067 |
3.587 ±0.080 |
3.767 ±0.061 |
Average female fetal body weight (g) per litter |
3.560 ±0.069 |
3.553 ±0.073 |
3.422 ±0.073 |
3.510 ±0.088 |
aincludes all dams pregnant at sacrifice; litter size = no. implantation sites per dam.
bReported as mean! S.E.M.
cNon-live =dead plus resorbed.
dAffected =non-live plus malformed.
eincludes only dams with live fetuses; litter size =no. live fetuses per dam.
fTwo dams had all resorptions.
gOne litter had no males.
hOne litter had no females.
iOne litter had no females.
ip,0.05 Jonckhecre'. Test.
'p<0.05Fisher exact test
Maternal Parameters after Exposure to Pregnant CD Rats to Various Dose Levels of Gentian Violet by Oral Gavage on Gestational Days 6 Through 15
|
Gentian Violet (mg/kg/day, po) |
|||
|
0.0 |
2.5 |
5 |
10 |
SUBJECTS (Dams) |
|
|
|
|
Total treated |
32 |
30 |
31 |
32 |
Removed |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Deaths |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Non-pregnant at sacrifice |
7 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
Pregnant (%) at sacrifice |
25 (78.1) |
26(86.7) |
24(77.4) |
25(86.2) |
MATERNAL BODY WEIGHT(g) |
|
|
|
|
Gestational day 0a |
228.55 ±3.11 |
232.87 ±3.51 |
227.90 ±2.97 |
234.17 ±4.14 |
Gestational day 6a |
250.20 ±3.51
|
251.83 ±3.96 |
248.47 ±3.10 |
255.58 ±3.73 |
Gestational day 11 |
272.25 ±3.52 |
272.08 ±3.86 |
262.70 ±3.81 |
250.72 ±5.69 |
Gestational day 15 |
290.12 ±4.26 |
288.99 ±3.97 |
277.00 ±4.39 |
268.39 ±6.93 |
Gestational day 20 |
345.00 ±6.03 |
347.83 ±6.52 |
334.89 ±6.53 |
319.01 ±9.21 |
Maternal Weight Gain (g) |
|
|
|
|
Gestation period |
116.45 ±4.38 |
114.96 ±5.85 |
106.98 ±5.34 |
84.84 ±9.35 |
Treatment period |
39.92 ±1.36 |
37.15 ±2.16 |
27.29 ±3.27 |
12.81 ±2.13 |
Absolute weight gain |
54.08 ±3.36 |
47.74 ±4.38 |
46.01 ±3.30 |
30.09 ±6.13 |
Gravid Uterine Weight (g)a |
62.37 ±4.38 |
67.22 ±3.23 |
60.98 ±4.64 |
54.75 ±5.49 |
Maternal Liver Weight (g)a |
14.15 ±0.26 |
14.40 ±0.29 |
13.74 ±0.35 |
13.46 ±0.47 |
Relative Maternal Liver Weight |
4.10 ±0.08 |
4.10 ±0.09 |
4.11 ±0.07 |
4.18 ±0.08 |
aincludes alldams pregnant at sacrifice;
bweight gain during gestation minus gravid uterine weight.
CThree dams hadall resorptions.
dOne liver weight had not recorded.
eOne liver weight was incorrectly recorded.
ip<0.05Jonckheeres̔ Test.
iip<0.01Jonckheeres̔ Test.
iiip0.001Jonckheeres̔ Test.
tp<0.05 Kruskal-wallis.
ttp<0.01 Kruskal-Wallis.
tttp<0.001 Kruskal-walli&
•p<0.01Mann-whintlleyU
• p<0.01Mann-whintlleyU.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 0.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is K4 and from secondary source
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Developmental toxicity
In different studies,N-(4-{bis[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]methylene}cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium chloride (548-62-9)has been investigated for developmental toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments i.e. most commonly in rats and rabbits for Gentian violet (548-62-9).
In experimental study given by NTP (National Center for Toxicological Research, TER82080 (study conducted in 1981-82).The teratogenicity study of Gentian violet (548-62-9) was performed in female New Zealand white rabbits. Total 133 animals used for study in which 30 female animals in control group. The doses were selected base upon preliminary toxicity study. All the animals provided with food and water ad libitum. Gentian violet was dissolved in distilled water in concentrations of 0, 0.5,1. 0 and 2.0 mg/ml for the conventional teratology study. Dosing solutions were stored at 5°C except at the time of dosing when they were warmed to room temperature, and stirred continuously with a magnetic stirrer and analytical verification done using spectrophotometry.
Artificially inseminated rabbits were used .Timed-pregnant CD rats were given gentian violet at dose levels of 0.0, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg/day in distilled water. Dams were weighed on gestational days 0, 6-19 (prior to daily dosing) and 30 (immediately prior to sacrifice), and were also observed for clinical signs of toxicity. At sacrifice on gestational day 30, dams were evaluated for body weight, liver weight, gravid uterine weight and status of uterine implantation sites (i.e., implantation sites, resorptions, dead fetuses, live fetuses). Live fetuses were dissected from the uterus and evaluated for live litter size, body weights, sex ratios and gross morphological abnormalities.All live fetuses were examined for visceral malformations employing the Staples' fresh tissue dissection method. Half of the fetuses were decapitated immediately after dissection and the heads were fixed in Bouin's solution for free hand sectioning and examination (Wilson's Technique). All fetal carcasses were cleared and stained with Alizarin Red S and examined for skeletal malformations.
The maternal mortality in the present study was 22.6% (7/31 does) in the 2mg/kg bw dose group, 15.4% (4/26) in the 1mg/kg bw dose group, 7.4% (2/27) in the0. 5mg/kg bw dose group and 0.0 (0/27) in the control group. A significant trend was seen toward reduction in maternal body weight on gestational day 19 (end of dosing), and in maternal weight gain (gestational period and treatment period). For maternal weight gain, all GV-exposed groups were significantly lower than for controls for both treatment and gestation period. Clinical signs, seen in a dose-related manner, included wheezing, diarrhea, congestion, wet nose, dyspnea, lacrimation, and anorexia and cyanosis (the latter two in those does which died). All GV-exposed groups exhibited a significant increase in the number of implantation sites per litter versus controls. Percentage of resorptions per litter and number of litters with resorptions, as well as the percentage of non-live (dead plus resorbed) and affected (non- live plus malformed) per litter exhibited a dose-related upward trend, but no significant pairwise comparisons. For live litters, the number of fetuses (male and/or female) per litter did not differ among dose groups. Average fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant downward trend with all dose group values significantly lower than controls. When separated by sex, only female fetal body weight per litter exhibited a significant downward trend and pairwise comparisons.
There were no significant dose-related effects on the incidence of gross, visceral or skeletal malformations per litter, nor in the number (or percent) of fetuses, males or females, malformed per litter nor in the number or percent of litters with malformed fetuses. Examination of malformation incidence by category indicated no malformations unique to or with a higher incidence in any of the GV-exposed groups relative to control. No evidence of teratogenicity of gentian violet was seen when administered by gavage to pregnant NZW rabbits during organogenesis at doses which produced evidence of maternal and fetal mortality and toxicity. Hence NOAEL for maternal toxicity and fetal toxicity was considered to be 2mg/kg bw /day i.e highest tested dose. When New Zealand white rabbits were treated with Gentian violet (548-62-9) orally.
In another experimental study given by National Centre for Toxicological Research,( NTP: TER82079 (1981)) The teratogenicity study of Gentian violet (548-62-9) was performed in female Charles River CD rat. Total 125 animals used for study in which 32 female animals in control group. The doses were selected base upon preliminary toxicity study. All the animals provided with food and water ad libitum. Gentian violet was dissolved in distilled water in concentrations of 0, 0.5,1. 0 and 2.0 mg/ml for the conventional teratology study. Dosing solutions were stored at 5°C except at the time of dosing when they were warmed to room temperature, and stirred continuously with a magnetic stirrer and analytical verification done using spectrophotometry.
Timed-pregnant CD rats were given gentian violet at dose levels of 0.0, 2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg/day in distilled water by gavage on gestational days 6 through 15.For proof of pregnancy examined vaginal smear for the presence of sperm and it considered as GD 0.Dams were weighed on gestational days 0, 6-15 (prior to daily dosing) and 20 (immediately following sacrifice), and were also observed for clinical signs of toxicity. At sacrifice on gestational day 20, dams were evaluated for body weight, liver weight, gravid uterine weight and status of uterine implantation sites (i.e., implantation sites, resorptions, dead fetuses, live fetuses). Live fetuses were dissected from the uterus and evaluated for live litter size, body weights, sex ratios and gross morphological abnormalities.All live fetuses were examined for visceral malformations employing the Staples' fresh tissue dissection method. Half of the fetuses were decapitated prior to dissection and the beads were fixed in Bouin's solution for free hand sectioning and examination (Wilson's Technique). All fetal carcasses were cleared and stained with Alizarin Red S and examined for skeletal malformations.
The maternal mortality rate in the present study was 9.4% (3/32dams) in the 10 mg/kg bw dose group; all other dams from all dose groups survived to terminal sacrifice on gestational day (gd) 20. A significant trend for reduced maternal body weight was found on gd 11 and 15 with the value for the 10 mg/kg bw dose group significantly different from controls on gd 11. A significant trend toward reductions in maternal weight gain for the gestation period, treatment period and absolute weight gain (weight gain during gestation minus gravid uterine weight) were found with the values for these three parameters in the 10mg/kg bw dose group significantly below those of control. Weight gain during the treatment period was also significantly reduced in the 10mg/kg bw dose group versus controls.
Clinical signs of toxicity presented a dose-response pattern, and included the following: weight loss of more than 5 grams in 24 hours, wheezing, lethargy, weakness, diarrhea, lacrimation and rough coat. There were no dose-related differences observed in the following reproductive measures: number of implantation sites per litter; number or percent of resorptions, fetal deaths or non-live (dead plus resorptions) per litter. Among live litters, the number of live fetuses per litter, number or percent males per litter, average fetal body weight, average male or female fetal body weight per litter were also unaffected by treatment. There was a significant trend toward an increased number and percent affected (non-live plus malformed) per litter with dose; the number of litters with affected fetuses was significantly elevated in the 10mg/kg bw dose group versus controls.
There were no gross malformations observed in any dose group in the study. Major visceral malformations observed included hydronephrosis (left or right) and hydroureter (unilaterally or bilaterally) with some fetuses exhibiting both malformations. Skeletal defects observed consisted mainly of short rib involving the thirteenth rib uni- or bilaterally. When incidences of all malformations were analyzed, there was a significant trend across dose groups toward increased number and percentage of fetuses, males, and females malformed per litter. In pairwise comparisons, the number and percentage of fetuses malformed per litter was significantly elevated in the 10mg/kg bw dose group versus controls as was the number of litters with malformed fetuses.
Gentian violetcaused an increase in hydroureter, hydronephrosis and short ribs, the incidence being significant only in the 10mg/kg bw dose group. These malformations were accompanied by signs of maternal toxicity i.e. reduction in maternal weight on gd 11, maternal weight gain during gestation and treatment periods, absolute weight gain and clinical signs. There was no significant incidence of malformations in the lower dose groups, in the absence of maternal toxicity (2.5mg/kg bw ) or in the presence of limited maternal toxicity (5mg/kg bw ). Hence, NOAEL for maternal toxicity was considered to be 2.5 mg/kg bw/day and for embryo or fatal toxicity was considered to be 5mg/kg bw day based on fetal effect seen in conjunction with maternal toxicity at 10mg/kg bw/day
Based on the above study on ,N-(4-{bis[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]methylene}cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium chloride (548-62-9)it can be concluded that NOAEL value is 30mg/kg bw in male and female Fischer 344 rats for reproductive toxicity and NOAEL value in parent New Zealand white rabbits were considered to be 0.5mg/kg/day, whereas for F1 generation was 2 mg/kg/day for developmental toxicity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above study on ,N-(4-{bis[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]methylene}cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene)-N-methylmethanaminium chloride (548-62-9)it can be concluded that NOAEL value is 30mg/kg bw in male and female Fischer 344 rats for reproductive toxicity and NOAEL value in parent New Zealand white rabbits were considered to be 0.5mg/kg/day, whereas 2 mg/kg/day for developmental toxicity in F1 generation.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.