Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 273-728-1 | CAS number: 69012-28-8 By-product of the manufacture of ferromanganese alloy containing primarily oxides of aluminum, manganese and silicon.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10 February 2010 to 9 April 2010.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.2 (Acute Toxicity for Daphnia)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (See principles of method if other than guideline.)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (See principles of method if other than guideline.)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- In view of the difficulties associated with the evaluation of aquatic toxicity of poorly water soluble test items, a modification of the standard method for the preparation of aqueous media was performed. An approach endorsed by several important regulatory authorities in the EU and elsewhere (ECETOC 1996 and OECD 2000), is to expose organisms to a Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF) of the test item in cases where the test item is a complex mixture and is poorly soluble in water and in the permitted auxiliary solvents and surfactants. Using this approach, aqueous media are prepared by mixing the test item with water for a prolonged period. Previous experience gained from studies conducted on poorly water soluble test items has shown that a mixing period of
24 - 48 hours is sufficient to ensure equilibration between the test item and water phase. At the completion of mixing, the test item phase is separated by siphon and the test organisms exposed to the aqueous phase or WAF (which may contain dissolved test item and/or leachates from the test item). Exposures are expressed in terms of the original concentration of test item in water at the start of the mixing period (loading rate) irrespective of the actual concentration of test item in the WAF. - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of Inspection: 15/09/09 Date of signature: 26/11/09
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling method: Water samples were taken from the control and each loading rate WAF test group (replicates R1 – R2 pooled) at 0 and 48 hours for quantitative analysis.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: Duplicate samples were taken and stored at approximately -20°C for further analysis if necessary. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Reconstituted water:
i) Stock Solutions
a) CaCl2.2H2O : 11.76 g/L
b) MgSO4.7H2O: 4.93 g/L
c) NaHCO3: 2.59 g/L
d) KCl: 0.23 g/L
ii) Preparation
An aliquot (25 mL) of each of solutions a) to d) was added to each litre (final volume) of deionised water with a conductivity of <5 µS cm^-1. The reconstituted water had a pH of 7.8 ± 0.2 adjusted (if necessary) with NaOH or HCl and was aerated until the dissolved oxygen concentration was approximately air-saturation value.
The reconstituted water used for both the range-finding and definitive tests was the same as that used to maintain the stock animals. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Water flea
- Strain: 1st instar Daphnia magna derived from in-house laboratory cultures
- Source: 1st instar Daphnia magna derived from in-house laboratory cultures
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): less than 24 hours old
- Peripheral shell growth removed prior to test initiation: not applicable
- Method of breeding: parthenogenesis
- Feeding during test: the daphnids received no food during the test
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: overnight - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 48 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- The number of immobilised Daphnia were recorded after 24 and 48 hours.
- Hardness:
- The reconstituted water had an approximate theoretical total hardness of 250 mg/L as CaCO3. (see appendix 3 in the attachments for detailed results).
- Test temperature:
- Water temperature was recorded daily throughout the test. The temperature was measured using a Hanna Instruments HI 93510. The test temperature was maintained at 21 °C throughout the study. (see appendix 3 in the attachments for detailed results).
- pH:
- The pH values were recorded at the start and termination of the test. The pH concentrations were measured using a WTW pH/Oxi 340I pH meter. Differences in pH were observed at 0 hours between the control and the 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L loading rate WAFs. (see appendix 3 in the attachments for detailed results).
- Dissolved oxygen:
- Dissolved oxygen concentrations were recorded at the start and termination of the test. The dissolved oxygen concentrations were measured using a
dissolved oxygen meter. There were no treatment related differences for oxygen concentration. (see appendix 3 in the attachments for detailed results).
The oxygen concentration in some of the test vessels was observed to have an air saturation value (ASV) in excess of 100%. This was considered to be due to the presence of microscopic air bubbles in the media super-saturating the diluent and was considered not to have had an impact on the outcome or integrity of the test as no adverse effects were observed in the control group. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- - Nominal concentrations:
In the range-finding test Daphnia magna were exposed to a series of nominal loading rates of 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L
Measured concentrations:
Analysis of the fresh media at 0 hours showed measured concentrations of manganese to range from 1.13 to 3.79 mg/L. Analysis of the old media at 48 hours showed measured concentrations of manganese to range from less than the limit of 1.16 to 3.62 mg/L.
Analysis of the control samples at 0 and 48 hours showed measured concentrations of 0.0155 and 0.0159 mg manganese/L. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250mL glass jars
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed top reduce evaporation.
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 200 mL
- Aeration: no
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): no test solution renewable
- No. of organisms per vessel: 10
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 2
- Biomass loading rate: not reported
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: An aliquot (25 mL) of each of solutions a-d was added to each litre (final volume) of deionised water with a conductivity of <5 µS cm-1. The reconstituted water had a pH of 7.8 ± 0.2 adjusted (if necessary) with NaOH or HCl and was aerated until the dissolved oxygen concentration was approximately air-saturation value.
Stock Solutions:
a) CaCl2.2H2O 11.76 g/L
b) MgSO4.7H2O 4.93 g/L
c) NaHCO3 2.59 g/L
d) KCl 0.23 g/L
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: The lighting cycle was controlled to give a 16 hours light and 8 hours darkness cycle with 20 minute dawn and dusk transition periods.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
Any immobilisation or adverse reactions to exposure were recorded at 24 and 48 hours after the start of exposure. The criterion of effect used was that Daphnia were considered to be immobilised if they were unable to swim for approximately 15 seconds after gentle agitation.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: In the range-finding test Daphnia magna were exposed to a series of nominal loading rates of 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Based on the results from the range finding study, loading rates of 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L, using a stirring period of 47 hours followed by a 1-hour standing period, were selected for the definitive test. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- potassium dichromate
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- 43 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: immobilisation
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL 41 - 46
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 32 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: immobilisation
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 0.78 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: immobilisation
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CL
- Duration:
- 48 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.32 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: immobilisation
- Details on results:
- Cumulative immobilisation data from the exposure of Daphnia magna to the test item during the range-finding test are given in Table 1 (please see the any other information on results section for all tables). Immobilisation was observed predominately at the 100 mg/L loading rate WAF.
A single immobilised daphnid was observed at the 1.0 and 10 mg/L loading rate WAFs after 48 hours exposure. These were considered to be due to natural causes rather than a toxic effect given that no further immobilisation was observed.
Analysis of the 100 mg/L loading rate WAF (see appendix 2) showed a measured concentration of manganese of 2.79 mg/L.
Based on this information loading rates of 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L, using a stirring period of 47 hours followed by a 1-hour standing period, were selected for the definitive test. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Cumulative immobilisation data from the exposure of Daphnia magna to the reference item (Harlan Laboratories Ltd Project No: 0039/1133) during the positive control are given in Table 4. The relationship between percentage immobilisation and concentration at 24 and 48 hours is given in Figures 2 and 3.
Analysis of the immobilisation data by the probit method (Finney 1971) at 24 hours and the trimmed Spearman-Karber method (Hamilton et al 1977) at 48 hours based on the nominal test concentrations gave the following results:
Time (h) EC50 (mg/L) 95% Confidence limits (mg/L)
24 0.84 0.72 - 0.97
48 0.65 0.58 - 0.72
The No Observed Effect Concentrations after 24 and 48 hours was 0.32 mg/L. The No Observed Effect Concentration is based upon zero immobilisation at this concentration.
The slope and its standard error of the response curve at 24 hours was 7.7 (SE = 1.6). Due to the unsuitable nature of the data it was not possible to calculate the slope and error of response curve at 48 hours.
The results from the positive control with potassium dichromate were within the normal range for this reference item. The mean 48-hour EC50 value calculated from all positive controls was 0.77 mg/L (SD = 0.20). - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- An estimate of the EL*50 value at 24 hours was given by inspection of the immobilisation data.
The EL*50 value and associated confidence limits at 48 hours were calculated by the trimmed Spearman-Karber method (Hamilton et al 1977) using the ToxCalc computer software package (ToxCalc 1999).
When only one partial response is shown the trimmed Spearman-Karber method is appropriate. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The acute toxicity of the test material to the freshwater invertebrate Daphnia magna has been investigated and gave a 48-hour EL*50 value of 43 mg/L loading rate WAF with 95% confidence limits of 41 - 46 mg/L loading rate WAF. The No Observed Effect Loading rate at 48 hours was 32 mg/L loading rate WAF.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed to assess the acute toxicity of the test material to Daphnia magna. The method followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (April 2004) No 202, "Daphnia sp, Acute Immobilisation Test" referenced as Method C.2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008.
Following a preliminary range-finding test, twenty daphnids (2 replicates of 5 animals) were exposed to Water Accommodated Fractions (WAFs) of the test material over a range of nominal loading rates of 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L for 48 hours under at a temperature of 21°C under static test conditions. The number of immobilised Daphnia were recorded after 24 and 48 hours.
A positive control conducted approximately every six months used potassium dichromate as the reference item. Daphnia magna were exposed to an aqueous solution of the reference item at concentrations of 0.32, 0.56, 1.0, 1.8 and 3.2 mg/L for 48 hours at a temperature of approximately 20°C under static test conditions. Immobilisation and any adverse reactions to exposure were recorded after 24 and 48 hours.
Under the conditions of the test, the 48-hour EL*50 for the test material, based on nominal loading rates, was 43 mg/L loading rate WAF with 95% confidence limits of 41 - 46 mg/L loading rate WAF. The No Observed Effect Loading rate was 32 mg/L loading rate WAF.
The 48-hour EC50 for the reference item to Daphnia magna based on nominal concentrations was 0.78 mg/L with 95% confidence limits of 0.58 – 0.72 mg/L. The No Observed Effect Concentration was 0.32 mg/L.
Reference
DefinitiveTest:
Immobilisation data:
Cumulative immobilisation data from the exposure of Daphnia magna to the test material during the definitive test are given in Table 2. The relationship between percentage immobilisation and loading rate at 48 hours is given in Figure 1.
Inspection of the immobilisation data at 24 hours and analysis of the immobilisation data by the trimmed Spearman-Karber method (Hamilton et al 1977) at 48 hours based on the nominal loading rates gave the following results:
Time (h) |
EL*50(mg/L) |
95% Confidence limits |
24 |
> 100** |
- |
48 |
43 |
41 - 46 |
The No Observed Effect Loading rate after 24 and 48 hours exposure was 32 mg/L loading rate WAF. The No Observed Effect Loading rate is based upon zero immobilisation at this loading rate.
A single immobilised daphnid was observed at the 10 mg/L loading rate WAF after 24 hours exposure. This was considered to be due to natural causes rather than a toxic effect given that no further immobilisation was observed and no immobilisation was observed at the 18 and 32 mg/L loading rate WAFs.
*EL = Effective Loading rate
** An EL50value could not be calculated as less than 50% immobilisation occurred at this time point
Table 1: Cumulative Immobilisation Data in the Range-finding Test
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
Cumulative Immobilised Daphnia |
|
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
|
Control |
0 |
0 |
1.0 |
0 |
1[1] |
10 |
0 |
1* |
100 |
5 |
10 |
[1] Immobilisation considered to be due to natural causes rather than a toxic effect given that no further immobilisation was observed
Table 2: Cumulative Immobilisation Data in the Definitive Test
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
Cumulative Immobilised Daphnia |
|||||||
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
|||||||
R1 |
R2 |
Total |
% |
R1 |
R2 |
Total |
% |
|
Control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1[1] |
0 |
1* |
5 |
1* |
0 |
1* |
5 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
20 |
9 |
10 |
19 |
95 |
100 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
100 |
R1– R2= Replicates 1 and 2
[1] Immobilisation considered to be due to natural causes rather than a toxic effect given that no further immobilisation was observed and no immobilisation was observed at the 18 and 32 mg/l loading rate WAFs
Table 3: Vortex Depth Measurements at the Start and End of the Mixing Period
|
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
|||||
Control |
10 |
18 |
||||
* |
+ |
* |
+ |
* |
+ |
|
Height of Water Column (cm) |
~17 |
~17 |
~17 |
~17 |
~17 |
~17 |
Depth of Vortex (cm) |
~0.2 |
~0.2 |
~0.2 |
~0.2 |
~0.2 |
~0.2 |
Observation of Vortex |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
|
Nominal Loading Rate (mg/L) |
|||||
32 |
56 |
100 |
||||
* |
+ |
* |
+ |
* |
+ |
|
Height of Water Column (cm) |
~17 |
~17 |
~17 |
~17 |
~17 |
~17 |
Depth of Vortex (cm) |
~0.2 |
~0.2 |
~0.2 |
~0.2 |
~0.2 |
~0.2 |
Observation of Vortex |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
Dimple present |
* Start of mixing period
+ End of mixing period
Table 4: Cumulative Immobilisation Data in the Positive Control
Nominal |
Cumulative Immobilised Daphnia |
|||||||
24 Hours |
48 Hours |
|||||||
R1 |
R2 |
Total |
% |
R1 |
R2 |
Total |
% |
|
Control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.32 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.56 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
25 |
1.0 |
7 |
7 |
14 |
70 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
100 |
1.8 |
10 |
9 |
19 |
95 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
100 |
3.2 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
100 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
100 |
Analytical results
The test concentrations were monitored by analysis of the test samples for manganese only.
Analysis of the fresh media at 0 hours showed measured concentrations of manganese to range from 1.13 to 3.79 mg/L. Analysis of the old media at 48 hours showed measured concentrations of manganese to range from less than the limit of 1.16 to 3.62 mg/L.
The dissolved test material may have been one or several components of the test material. Given that toxicity cannot be attributed to a single component or mixture of components but to the test material as a whole, the results were based on nominal loading rates only.
Description of key information
48-hour EL*50 = 43 mg/L loading rate WAF; 48-hour NOEC = 32 mg/L loading rate WAF, OECD 202, EU Method C.2, Priestly & Mullee (2010)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
A study was performed to assess the acute toxicity of the test material to Daphnia magna. The method followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (April 2004) No 202, "Daphnia sp, Acute Immobilisation Test" referenced as Method C.2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008.
Following a preliminary range-finding test, twenty daphnids (2 replicates of 5 animals) were exposed to Water Accommodated Fractions (WAFs) of the test material over a range of nominal loading rates of 10, 18, 32, 56 and 100 mg/L for 48 hours under at a temperature of 21°C under static test conditions. The number of immobilised Daphnia were recorded after 24 and 48 hours.
A positive control conducted approximately every six months used potassium dichromate as the reference item. Daphnia magna were exposed to an aqueous solution of the reference item at concentrations of 0.32, 0.56, 1.0, 1.8 and 3.2 mg/L for 48 hours at a temperature of approximately 20°C under static test conditions. Immobilisation and any adverse reactions to exposure were recorded after 24 and 48 hours.
Under the conditions of the test, the48-hour EL*50 for the test material, based on nominal loading rates, was 43 mg/L loading rate WAF with 95% confidence limits of 41 - 46 mg/L loading rate WAF. The No Observed Effect Loading rate was 32 mg/L loading rate WAF.
The 48-hour EC50 for the reference item to Daphnia magna based on nominal concentrations was 0.78 mg/L with 95% confidence limits of 0.58 – 0.72 mg/L. The No Observed Effect Concentration was 0.32 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.