Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12-Mar-2012 to 09-Apr-2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline no. 439: In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Formaldehyde, telomer with 1,3-benzenedimethanamine, 1,3-benzenediol and ethenylbenzene
EC Number:
615-240-7
Cas Number:
710292-85-6
Molecular formula:
Not available for this UVCB
IUPAC Name:
Formaldehyde, telomer with 1,3-benzenedimethanamine, 1,3-benzenediol and ethenylbenzene
Test material form:
other: waxy solid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): HK 128
- Substance type: Red-violet waxy solid
- Physical state: Solid
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature in the dark


Test system

Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 25.7 to 27.2 mg, moistened with 5 µl water

NEGATIVE CONTOL:
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 10 µl Phosphate buffered saline

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 10 µl
- Concentration (if solution): 5% (aq) Sodium dodecyl sulphate
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Exposure:15 minutes
Post incubation period: 42 hours
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: human epidermis model
- % coverage: 0.38 cm2

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): phosphate buffered saline
- Time after start of exposure: 15 minutes

POST INCUBATION PERIOD
- 42 hours

SCORING SYSTEM:
- After a 42 hour incubation period, determination of the cytotoxic (irritancy) effect was performed. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT at the end of the treatment. Cell viability was calculated for each tissue as a percentage of the mean of the negative control tissues.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Remarks:
in comparison with negative control
Value:
107
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The in vitro skin irritation test was conducted according to OECD 439 guideline and GLP principles. It is concluded that this test is valid and that HK 128 is non-irritant in the in vitro skin irritation test.

Executive summary:

Skin irritation is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test substance. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 15 minutes treatment with HK 128 compared to the negative control tissues was 107%. Since the mean relative tissue viability for HK 128 was above 50% after 15 minutes treatment HK 128 is considered to be non-irritant.

 

The positive control had a mean cell viability of 6% after 15 minutes exposure. The absolute mean OD570(optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the acceptability criteria. The standard deviation value of the percentage viability of three tissues treated identically was less than 5%, indicating that the test system functioned properly.