Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of Tetrasodium 2-[{4-[{4-[(4-amino-6-chloro-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]-5-sulfonatonaphthalen-1-yl}diazenyl]-7-sulfonatonaphthalen-1-yl}diazenyl]benzene-1,4-disulfonate and Tetrasodium 2-[{4-[{4-[(4-amino-6-chloro-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]-5-sulfonatonaphthalen-1-yl}diazenyl]-6-sulfonatonaphthalen-1-yl}diazenyl]benzene-1,4-disulfonate
EC number: 916-837-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- None
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 221 (Lemna sp. Growth Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- March 2006
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- None
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No. of test material: Sponsor Lot/Batch number 43 (India)
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 03 February 2020
- Purity: 84.3 %
- Purity test date:
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Frozen at approximately -20 °C - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- In order to determine the stability of the test item under test conditions a sample of each test concentration was taken for chemical analysis on Day 2 (fresh media) and Day 5 (old media). An additional sample of each test concentration was prepared on Day 0 and incubated alongside the test until Day 7 in order to determine stability over the entire test duration. All samples were stored frozen prior to analysis.
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Remarks:
- culture medium
- Details on test solutions:
- A nominal amount of test item (100 mg) was dissolved in culture medium and the volume adjusted to 1 liter to give the 100 mg/L test concentration from which a series of dilutions was made to give further test concentrations of 10 and 1.0 mg/L. Each of the prepared concentrations was inverted several times to ensure adequate mixing and homogeneity.
- Test organisms (species):
- Lemna minor
- Details on test organisms:
- A culture of Lemna minor was obtained from Canadian Phycological Culture Centre, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Cultures were maintained in the laboratory by the periodic replenishment of culture medium. The culture was maintained in the laboratory at a temperature of 24 ± 1 ºC under continuous illumination (intensity approximately 7000 lux) for at least 7 days prior to the start of the test.
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 7 d
- Remarks on exposure duration:
- None
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- No data
- Test temperature:
- 24 ± 1 °C
- pH:
- 6.8 - 8.9
- Dissolved oxygen:
- No data
- Salinity:
- No data
- Conductivity:
- No data
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Day 0 Nominal concentration = 100 mg/L Measured concentration = 98.8 mg/L i.e. 99 % nominal
Day 7 Nominal concentration = 100 mg/L Measured concentration = 103 mg/L i.e. 103 % nominal - Details on test conditions:
- Range-Finding test:
The test concentration to be used in the definitive test was determined by a preliminary range-finding test. The range-finding test was conducted by exposing Lemna minor to a series of nominal test concentrations of 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L for a period of 7 days. The test was conducted in glass conical flasks (500 mL). Two replicate flasks were prepared for each control and test concentration. The test item was dissolved directly in culture medium. A nominal amount of test item (100 mg) was dissolved in culture medium and the volume adjusted to 1 liter to give the 100 mg/L test concentration from which a series of dilutions was made to give further test concentrations of 10 and 1.0 mg/L. Each of the prepared concentrations was inverted several times to ensure adequate mixing and homogeneity. The control group was maintained under identical conditions but not exposed to the test item. At the start of the range-finding test the number of fronds present in each test and control culture was recorded along with observations on frond size, appearance, root length and number of colonies present. The flasks were then incubated at 24 ± 1 ºC under continuous illumination (intensity approximately 7000 lux) for 7 days. On Days 2 and 5 the test solutions were renewed, and observations on the test organisms were recorded on days 0, 2, 5 and 7.
Definitive Test:
Based on the result of the range-finding test a “limit test” was conducted at a concentration of 100 mg/L to confirm that at the maximum concentration given in the OECD Test Guidelines, no effect on growth was observed.
Experimental Preparation:
A nominal amount of test item (200 mg) was dissolved in culture medium and the volume adjusted to 2 liters to give the required test concentration of 100 mg/L. The prepared concentration was inverted several times to ensure adequate mixing and homogeneity.
The concentration and stability of the test item in the test preparations were verified by chemical analysis on Day 0 and Day 7.
Exposure Conditions:
As in the range-finding test glass conical flasks were used. Six flasks each containing 250 mL of solution were prepared for the control and 100 mg/L treatment group. The control group was maintained under identical conditions but not exposed to the test item. Each control and test flask were inoculated with 3 colonies of Lemna minor (total 11 fronds). The flasks were then incubated at 24 ± 1 ºC under constant illumination (intensity approximately 7000 lux) for 7 days. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3,5-dichlorophenol
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- frond number
- Key result
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- frond number
- Details on results:
- Range-finding Test:
The frond counts and percentage inhibition of growth values from the exposure of Lemna minor to the test item during the range-finding test are given in Table 1. The results showed no significant effect on growth at the test concentrations of 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L. Based on this information a single test concentration of six replicates of 100 mg/L was selected for the definitive test. This experimental design conforms to a “limit test” to confirm that at the maximum test concentration given in the OECD Test Guidelines, no effect on growth was observed. Chemical analysis of the 100 mg/L test preparations showed near nominal concentrations were obtained indicating that the test item was stable under test conditions.
Definitive Test:
Average Specific Growth Rate:
ErC10 (frond number) ≥100 mg/L
ErC20 (frond number) ≥100 mg/L
ErC50 (frond number) ≥100 mg/L
"No Observed Effect Concentration" (NOEC) in terms of inhibition of average specific growth rates calculated from frond numbers was 100 mg/L
Yield:
EyC10 (frond number) ≥100 mg/L
EyC20 (frond number) ≥100 mg/L
EyC50 (frond number) ≥100 mg/L
"No Observed Effect Concentration" (NOEC) in terms of inhibition of yield calculated from frond numbers was 100 mg/L.
Average Specific Growth Rate dry weight):
ErC10 (dry weight) ≥100 mg/L
ErC20 (dry weight) ≥100 mg/L
ErC50 (dry weight) ≥100 mg/L
"No Observed Effect Concentration" (NOEC) in terms of inhibition of average specific growth rate calculated from dry weight was 100 mg/L.
Yield (dry weight):
EyC10 (dry weight) ≥100 mg/L
EyC20 (dry weight) ≥100 mg/L
EyC50 (dry weight) ≥100 mg/L
"No Observed Effect Concentration" (NOEC) in terms of inhibition of yield calculated from dry weight was 100 mg/L. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- None
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Statistical analysis:
A Students t-test incorporating Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981) was carried out on the average specific growth rate and yield data at 7 days for the control and 100 mg/L test concentration to determine any statistically significant differences between the test and control groups. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS computer software package (SAS, 1999-2001). - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Exposure of Lemna minor to the test item based on nominal concentrations gave the following results:
EC50: >100 mg/L (Average specific growth rate - frond number and dry weight)
EC50: >100 mg/L (Yield:Frond Number, dry weight)
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC):
100 mg/L (Average specific growth rate - frond number)
100 mg/L (Yield:Frond Number, dry weight) - Executive summary:
A study was performed to assess the effect of the test item on the growth of the freshwater plant Lemna minor according to the OECD Guideline 221. Following a preliminary range-finding test, Lemna minor was exposed to an aqueous solution of the test item at a concentration of 100 mg/L (six replicate flasks) for a period of 7 days, under constant illumination at a temperature of 24 ± 2 °C. The number of fronds in each control and treatment group was recorded on Days 0, 3, 5 and 7 along with observations on plant development. Chemical analysis of the test preparation on Day 0 (fresh media) and Day 7 (old media) showed measured test concentrations to range from 99 % to 102 % of nominal and so the results are based on nominal test concentrations only. Exposure of Lemna minor to the test item based on nominal concentrations gave the following results:
EC50: >100 mg/L (Average specific growth rate - frond number and dry weight)
EC50: >100 mg/L (Yield:Frond Number, dry weight)
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC):
100 mg/L(Average specific growth rate - frond number)
100 mg/L (Yield: Frond Number, dry weight)
Reference
Validation Criteria:
The data show that the doubling time of the control cultures was 1.77 days in line with the OECD Guideline that states the doubling time should be less than 2.5 days: Mean frond number in control cultures at day 0: 11
Mean frond number in control cultures at day 7: 120
Statistical analysis:
Statistical analysis of data for growth and yield was carried out for the control and 100 mg/L test group using a Student’s t-test incorporating Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981). There were no statistically significant differences (P≥0.05), between the control and 100 mg/L test groups.
Description of key information
Exposure of Lemna minor to the test item based on nominal concentrations gave the following results:
EC50: >100 mg/L (Average specific growth rate - frond number and dry weight)
EC50: >100 mg/L ( Yield:Frond Number, dry weight)
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC):
100 mg/L (Average specific growth rate - frond number)
100 mg/L (Yield: Frond Number, dry weight)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater plants:
- 100 mg/L
Additional information
The study was performed to assess the effect of the test item on the growth of the freshwater plant Lemna minor according to the OECD Guideline 221. Following a preliminary range-finding test, Lemna minor was exposed to an aqueous solution of the test item at a concentration of 100 mg/L (six replicate flasks) for a period of 7 days, under constant illumination at a temperature of 24 ± 2 °C. The number of fronds in each control and treatment group was recorded on Days 0, 3, 5 and 7 along with observations on plant development. Chemical analysis of the test preparation on Day 0 (fresh media) and Day 7 (old media) showed measured test concentrations to range from 99 % to 102 % of nominal and so the results are based on nominal test concentrations only. Exposure of Lemna minor to the test item based on nominal concentrations gave the following results:
EC50: >100 mg/L (Average specific growth rate - frond number and dry weight)
EC50: >100 mg/L (Yield:Frond Number, dry weight)
No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC):
100 mg/L (Average specific growth rate - frond number)
100 mg/L (Yield:Frond Number, dry weight)
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.