Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
25 Sep 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Version / remarks:
09 Oct 2017
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sorbitan, tridocosanoate
EC Number:
301-037-8
EC Name:
Sorbitan, tridocosanoate
Cas Number:
93980-59-7
Molecular formula:
C72H138O8
IUPAC Name:
Sorbitan tridocosanoate

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
cattle
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Hokkaido Livestock Corporation, Douo Plant, Hayakita Factory
- Number of eyeballs: 30, 12 used in the study
- Characteristics of donor animals: 12 months to less than 60 months old, healthy
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue: The collected eyeballs were immersed in Hanks' balanced salt solution, and stored and transported at less than 20°C until use in the test (temperature range during transportation: 12 - 14°C).
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: same day
- Indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: no

Test system

Vehicle:
water
Controls:
yes, concurrent vehicle
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 750 µL
- Concentration: 10% (w/v)

VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied: 8 mL
- Concentration: undiluted
- Lot/batch no.: K7D7
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 min
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
2 h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
triplicates
Details on study design:
SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS : A careful macroscopic examination was performed on all eyes to detect the presence of any defects (corneal opacity, scratches, neovascularization etc). Any eyes with defects were discarded. The corneas were dissected with a 2 to 3 mm rim of the sclera remaining, and were immersed in Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS). The corneae were directly used in the BCOP test on the same day.

QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS : Eyes were free of defects.

NUMBER OF REPLICATES : 3

SOLVENT CONTROL USED: yes, distilled water

POSITIVE CONTROL USED : yes, Dimethylformamide

APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME : 750 μL test item (10%), 10 min

TREATMENT METHOD: closed chamber

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: at least 3 times with phenol red-containing MEM and 1 time with phenol red-free MEM

- POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION: yes, 2 h

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: measured using the opacitometer
- Corneal permeability: passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of UV/VIS spectrophotometry (OD490)

SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)

DECISION CRITERIA: The decision criteria as indicated in the TG (OECD 437) was used.

STUDY ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA: The following study acceptance criteria described in OECD TG 437 were adopted:
A test is considered acceptable if the IVIS of the positive control is within 2 standard deviations of the latest historical control mean. A test is considered acceptable if the opacity and permeability values of the negative control are less than the upper limit of opacity and permeability values of the historical control data obtained from the bovine corneas treated with the negative control.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Run / experiment:
Negative control (Mean corrected final opacity)
Value:
0.7
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
fluorescein leakage
Remarks:
(Permeability)
Run / experiment:
Negative control (Mean corrected OD490 change)
Value:
0
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
Negative control
Value:
0.7
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Run / experiment:
Test substance (Mean corrected final opacity)
Value:
-0.7
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
fluorescein leakage
Remarks:
(Permeability)
Run / experiment:
Test substance (Mean corrected OD490 change)
Value:
-0.001
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
Test substance
Value:
-0.7
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Run / experiment:
Positive control (Mean corrected final opacity)
Value:
95.6
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
fluorescein leakage
Remarks:
(Permeability)
Run / experiment:
Positive control (Mean corrected OD490 change)
Value:
0.77
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
Positive control
Value:
107.2
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: not demonstrated in the study report

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes
- Range of historical values if different from the ones specified in the test guideline:

Opacity
Negative control: -2.0 - 2.4
Positive control: 38.0 - 111.0

Permeability
Negative control: -0.003 - 0.027
Positive control: 0.171 - 1.708

IVIS:
Negative control: -2.0 - 2.4
Positive control: 42.3 - 128.0 (mean ± 2SD: 67.4 ~ 128.2)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/ EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008