Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
20 Apr - 27 Apr 1998
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-Guideline study.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1998
Report date:
1998

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1992
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1992
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Ministerium für Umwelt, Raumordnung und Landwirtschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf, Germany

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Glycerol tristearate
EC Number:
209-097-6
EC Name:
Glycerol tristearate
Cas Number:
555-43-1
Molecular formula:
C57H110O6
IUPAC Name:
1,3-bis(octadecanoyloxy)propan-2-yl octadecanoate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Chemical identity: glycerol tristearate
- Physical state: white, homogeneous powder
- Analytical purity: 98%
- Purity test date: June 17th, 1996
- Batch No.: 512014
- Date of production: January 29th, 1996
- Stability under test conditions: > 3 years
- Storage condition of test material: in tightly closed containers under exhaust hood
- Solubility (20 °C): practically insoluble in water
- Density (20°C): about 0.95 g/cm³

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Small White Russian, Mol. Russian, Chbb:MH
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Møllegaard Breeding & Research Center Ltd., Lille Skensved, Denmark
- Age at study initiation: adult animals
- Weight at study initiation: 2.2, 2.4 and 2.4 kg (animals #1, 2 and 3, respectively)
- Housing: conventional, single housing in stainless steel cages
- Diet: Ssniff K 4 complete feed for rabbits (Ssniff Spezialfutter GmbH, Soest, Germany), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 14 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the untreated eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.1 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period (in vivo):
6 days
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and 6 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 males
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): the treated eyes were were rinsed with warm physiological saline
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 6 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 6 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 6 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
1 h post-instillation: some definitely hyperaemic (injected) blood vessels in 1 animal, diffuse, crimson red coloured mucous membranes (individual vessels were not easily discernible) in 2 animals. Swelling above normal of lids (and nictating membranes) and discharge in form of white mucous were observed in all 3 animals.
24-72 h post-instillation: the conjunctivae of all 3 animals still showed some definitely hyperaemic blood vessels.
6 days post-instillation: no more irritations on eye and mucous membrane were observed in any animal.
During the whole observation period, cornea and iris of all animals were free of any irritations.
Other effects:
No further local or systemic effects were reported.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Summary of results.

 

Rabbit #

Time [h]

conjunctivae

iris

cornea

redness

swelling

1

1

2

1

0

0

24

1

0

0

0

48

1

0

0

0

72

1

0

0

0

average

1.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2

1

1

1

0

0

24

1

0

0

0

48

1

0

0

0

72

1

0

0

0

average

1.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3

1

2

1

0

0

24

1

0

0

0

48

1

0

0

0

72

1

0

0

0

average

1.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time [h]

conjunctivae

iris

cornea

 

redness

swelling

average score

1

1.66

1.00

0.00

0.00

24

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

48

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

72

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

24+48+72

1.00*

0.00

0.00

0.00

 

* On Day 6 post-instillation, the conjuctival redness score was 0 in all animals.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified