Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 401-950-2 | CAS number: 31506-43-1 3-(DIMETHYLAMINO)PROPYL UREA; HST 2844
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- This study was designed to comply with the standards set forth in 49 CFR 173.137 which directs that this study be conducted according to the July 1992 OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Number 404, "Acute Dermal InitationlCorrosionn.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test article was kept in contact with the skin for three (3) minutes and scored for erythema and edema one hour following patch removal. Since the 3 minute exposure did not produce a definitive effect, two additional rabbits were added to the study. All three animals were dosed at site #2 for an exposure period of 1 hour and at site #3 for a four hour exposure. Each site was scored for erythema and edema one hour following patch removal, at 24, 48 and 72 hours and again on days 7 and 14.
- Observation period:
- Animals were observed for systemic signs at each dermal scoring interval.
- Number of animals:
- 3 New Zealand White rabbits
- Details on study design:
- New Zealand White rabbits were received from Ace Animals, Boyertown, PA on 12/21/99. Following a quarantine period of at least one week, three healthy New Zealand White rabbits were selected for this test from a larger group.
The animals were born the weeks of 10/10 through 10/24/99. The pretest body weight was 2.0 kg. The animals were identified by cage notation and a uniquely numbered metal eartag. The animals were housed llcage in suspended cages. Bedding was placed beneath the cages and changed at least three timeslweek. Fresh Purina Rabbit Chow (Diet #5321) was provided daily. Water was available libitum.
The animal room, reserved exclusively for rabbits on acute tests, was temperature controlled, had a 12 hour lightidark cycle and was kept clean and vermin free. - Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- 3 minute exposure: There was no erythema or edema.
1 hour exposure: There was no erythema or edema.
4 hour exposure: There was no erythema or edema. - Other effects:
- Two animals had diarrhea and soiling of the anogenital area. The remaining animal appeared normal during the observation period. Body weight changes were normal.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- NE 1060 is not corrosive to rabbit skin. The modified Primarv Irritation Index is 0.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this study was to determine if the test article causes irreversible damage when applied to the rabbit skin.
Initially, one healthy New Zealand White rabbit was placed in a restrainer and dosed with NE 1060. The test article (0.5 ml) was placed on the intact skin of the back (Site 1). The test article was kept in contact
with the skin for three (3) minutes and scored for erythema and edema one hour following patch removal. Since the 3 minute exposure did not produce a definitive effect, two additional rabbits were added to the
study. All three animals were dosed at Site 2 for an exposure period of 1 hour and at Site 3 for a four hour exposure. Each site was scored for erythema and edema one hour following patch removal, at 24, 48, and 72 hours and again on Days 7 and 14. Animals were observed for systemic signs at each dermal scoring interval. A modified primary irritation index was calculated. Body weights were recorded pretest and at termination.
3 minute exposure: There was no erythema or edema.
1 hour exposure: There was no erythema or edema.
4 hour exposure: There was no erythema or edema.
Systemic observations: Two animals had diarrhea and soiling of the anogenital area. The remaining animal appeared normal during the observation period. Body weight changes were normal.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- This study was designed to comply with the standards set forth in OECD Guidelines For Testing Chemicals, Number 405, adopted February 24, 1987.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- New Zealand White rabbits were received from Ace Animals, Boyertown, PA on 12/21/99 and quarantined for at least five days. Only animals in apparent good health were made available for study assignment. Prior to being selected for this study, both eyes of each animal were examined according to the Draize technique for any evidence of irritation or abnormalities of the cornea, iris and/or conjunctiva.
A Mini-Maglite flashlight equipped with a high intensity bulb was used to aid in the examination. Three rabbits (males), free from evidence of ocular irritation or abnormalities, were assigned to this study.
The animals were born the weeks of 10/10 through 10/24/99. The pretest body weight was 2.1 kg. The animals were identified by cage notation and a uniquely numbered metal eartag. The animals were housed llcage in suspended cages. Bedding was placed beneath the cages and changed at least three times week. Fresh Purina Rabbit Chow (Diet #5321) was provided daily. Water was available ad libitum. The animal room, reserved exclusively for rabbits on acute tests, was temperature controlled, had a 12 hour lightldark cycle and was kept clean and vermin free. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- One eye of each rabbit was dosed. The contralateral eye sewed as a control. The test article (0.1 ml) was placed by syringe into the conjunctival sac which was formed by gently pulling the lower eyelid away from the eye. After instillation, the lids were held together for approximately one second to insure adequate distribution of the test article.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Using a Mini-Maglite flashlight equipped with a high intensity bulb, the treated eye of each rabbit was examined for irritation of the cornea, iris and conjunctiva at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours post dose and on day 7.
Ocular reactions were graded according to the numerical Draize technique. Additional signs were described. - Observation period (in vivo):
- 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours post dose and on day 7
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three healthy New Zealand White rabbits (males)
- Details on study design:
- Three healthy New Zealand White rabbits (males), free from evidence of ocular initation and corneal abnormalities, were dosed with NE 1060. The test article (0.1 ml) was placed into the conjunctival sac of one eye of each rabbit. The eyes were examined and scored by the Draize technique at 1,24,48 and 72 hours post dose and on day 7. The primary eye irritation score for each rabbit, each day, was calculated. Body weights were recorded pretest
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 65 - <= 85
- Max. score:
- 85
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 63
- Max. score:
- 63
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 38 - <= 63
- Max. score:
- 63
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 40 - <= 60
- Max. score:
- 60
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 40
- Max. score:
- 40
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 15 - <= 40
- Max. score:
- 40
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 5
- Max. score:
- 5
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 5
- Max. score:
- 5
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 5
- Max. score:
- 5
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- >= 18 - <= 20
- Max. score:
- 20
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 18
- Max. score:
- 18
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 18
- Max. score:
- 18
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Corneal opacity, iritis and conjunctival irritation persisted through day 7.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- NE 1060 is corrosive
- Executive summary:
Corneal opacity, intis and conjunctival irritation persisted through day 7. One instance of soiling of the anogenital area was noted during the observation period.
Conclusion: NE 1060 is corrosive.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.