Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 296-019-9 | CAS number: 92201-88-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From April 01, 2009 to June 16, 2009
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- as layed down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- A valid GMPT study was available before REACH came into force, therefore no additional LLNA study was conducted.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered) and C18 unsatd., reaction products with diethylene triamine, di-Me sulfate quaternized
- Molecular formula:
- UVCB
- IUPAC Name:
- Fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered) and C18 unsatd., reaction products with diethylene triamine, di-Me sulfate quaternized
- Test material form:
- solid
- Remarks:
- Paste
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
Albino Dunkin Hartley Guinea Pig, CRL:(HA)BR, SPF
- Age at study initiation: 4-6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: pretest groups: 332 - 349 g, test and control group: 330 - 366 g
- Housing: individually in Makrolon type-4 cages with standard softwood bedding ("Lignocel", Schill AG, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland).
- Diet: ad libitum, pelleted standard Provimi Kliba 3418 guinea pig breeding / maintenance diet batch no. 82/08, Provimi Kliba AG, 4303 Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
- Water: ad libitum, tap water as for human consumption
- Acclimation period: animals of test and control group were acclimatised, no data on acclimation length
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): automatically controlled light cycle of 12 h light and 12 h dark
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Induction
- Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- polyethylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- Induction: 0.5 % (V/V) in intradermal, 10 % (V/V) epicutaneous challenge: 1 % (V/V)
Concentration selection based on a small scale dose range studies
Challenge
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- polyethylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- Induction: 0.5 % (V/V) in intradermal, 10 % (V/V) epicutaneous challenge: 1 % (V/V)
Concentration selection based on a small scale dose range studies
- No. of animals per dose:
- treatment group: 10
control group: 5 - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING STUDIES
Intradermal injection:
For intradermal injections (0.1 mL/site) of a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Freund's Complete Adjuvant/physiological saline were made into the shaved neck of three guinea pig. Six days later intradermal injections (0.1 mL/site) were made into the clipped flank . One animal received spatially divided injections of 25, 15, and 10 % , one of 5, 2.5, and 1 % and one of 0.5 and 0.1 %. Concentrations were formulated in polyethylene glycol 300 (PEG 300). Dermal reactions were assessed 24 hours later.
Dermal application:
Four intradermal injections (0.1 mL/site) of a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Freund's Complete Adjuvant/physiological saline were made into the shaved neck of two guinea pigs. Six days later, four patches of filter paper (3 x 3 cm) were saturated with the test item at 100% (technically the highest possible concentration to be applied sufficiently), 75%, 50% and 25% in PEG 300 and applied to the clipped and shaved flanks of the same guinea pigs. The amount or volume of test item preparation applied was approximately 0.2 g at 100%, 75% and 50% or 0.2 mL at 25%. The concentration causing mild (to moderate) local skin reaction and the concentration being the highest tested non-irritating concentration could not be determined after the epidermal pretest described above. Therefore, a second pretest was performed with two additional naive guinea pigs, treated in the same way as those described previously, with the concentrations of 15%, 10%, 5% and 1% in PEG 300, using an application volume of approximately 0.2 mL.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- First stage (test day 1)
An area of dorsal skin from the scapular region (approximately 6 x 8 cm) was clipped free of hair. Three pairs of intradermal injections (0.1 mL/site) were made symmetrically in two rows on either side of the sine just within the boundaries of a 4 x 6 cm area in the clipped region.
-- Test groups:
1. 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline
2. The test item at 0.5% in PEG 300
3. The test item at 0.5% in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline
- Control group:
1. 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline
2. PEG 300
3. 1:1 (w/w) mixture of PEG 300 in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of Freund's Complete Adjuvant and physiological saline
- Second stage - One week after the intradermal injections (test day 8), the scapular area (approximately 6 x 8 cm) was again clipped and shaved free of hair prior to the application. A 2 x 4 cm patch of filter paper was saturated with the test item at 10% in PEG 300 and placed over the injection sites of the test animals. The volume of test item preparation applied was approximately 0.3 mL. The patch was covered with aluminum foil and firmly secured by an elastic plaster wrapped around the trunk of the animal and secured with impervious adhesive tape. The occlusive dressings were left in place
for 48 hours. The epidermal application procedure described ensured intensive contact of the test item.
The guinea pigs of the control group were treated as described above with PEG 300 only, applied at a volume of approximately 0.3 mL.
The reaction sites were assessed 24 and 48 hours after removal of the bandage for erythema and oedema according to the method of Magnusson and Kligman.
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE (test day 22)
The test and control guinea pigs were challenged two weeks after the epidermal induction application and were treated in the same way.
Two patches (3 x 3 cm) of filter paper were saturated with the test item at the highest tested nonirritating concentration of 1% (applied to the left flank) and the vehicle only (PEG 300 applied to the right flank) using the same method as for the epidermal application. The volume of test item preparation and vehicle alone applied was approximately 0.2 mL. The dressings were left in place for 24 hours.
C. OBSERVATION and SCORING
The test item skin area of the animals used for the epidermal pretest and challenge was depilated approximately 21 hours after the patches have been removed, using an approved depilatory cream (VEET Cream, Reckitt & Colman AG, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland). The depilation was performed to clean the stratum corneum from the possible staining produced by the test item and to facilitate the reading of the possible skin reaction. The depilatory cream was placed on the patch sites and surrounding areas, and left on for up to 3-5 minutes. It was then thoroughly washed off with a stream of warm, running water. The animals were then dried with a disposable towel, and returned to their cages.
The scoring system was performed by visual assessment of erythema and oedema.
0 = no visible change
1 = discrete or patchy erythema
2 = moderate and confluent erythema
3 = intense erythema and swelling
Any other gross lesions not covered by this scoring system were described.
The grading method used for the pretest, induction and challenge was identical. It was performed 24 ± 2 hours after removal of the patches for the intradermal and epidermal pretest and induction and for challenge and repeated 24 ± 2 hours later (48-hour grades) for the epidermal pretest,
epidermal induction and challenge.
OTHER OBSERVATIONS
- Viability / Mortality: Daily from delivery of the animals to the termination of the test.
- Clinical Signs / Grading of Skin Response: Daily from delivery of the animals to the termination of test. Skin responses were graded during the pretest, induction and challenge periods.
- Body Weights: At delivery/acclimatization start, at the end of the pretest, at test day 1 (day of treatment) and at the termination of the study.
POSITIVE CONTROL (RELIABILITY CHECK):
- The sensitivity and reliability of the experimental technique employed was assessed by use of ALPHA-HEXYLCINNAMALDEHYDE which is recommended by the OECD 406 Guidelines and is known to have moderate skin sensitisation properties in the guinea pig strain. The results from the most recent test run (Harlan Laboratories Study C16261, performed from 08-Oct-2008 to 14-Nov-2008) were included in the study report.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) were calculated for body weights. No inferential statistics were used. - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde, periodically tested, most recent test run performed from 08-Oct-2008 to 14-Nov-2008
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- All test animals showed skin reactions after the challenge treatment with Alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde at 3% in PEG 300. No skin effect was observed in the animals treated with Alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde at 1% in PEG 300. No skin effect was observed in the control group.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 1%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- discrete patchy erythema
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 1%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 1%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 1%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: Vehicle (PEG) control in initiated animals
- Dose level:
- 0%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: Vehicle 9PEG) control in initiated animals
- Dose level:
- 0%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 3% in PEG 300
- No. with + reactions:
- 5
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
Any other information on results incl. tables
RESULTS
Range finding studies:
Intradermal injection: All tested concentrations caused skin reactions:
- 25 and 10 %: moderate and confluent erythema (score 2) with swelling
- 10, 5, 2.5 and 1 %: moderate and confluent erythema (score 2)
- 0.5 %: discrete or patchy erythema (score 1)
- 0.1 %: discrete or patchy erythema (score 1) with blanching
Dermal application: The test item at a concentration of 1 % caused no skin reactions. Concentration depended skin reactions after application of 5 to 100 %:
- 100 and 75 %: at 24 and 48 h scoring intense erythema and swelling (score 3), at 48 h with scaling and necrosis
- 50 %: at 24 and 48 h scoring moderate and confluent erythema (score 2), at 24 with swelling, at 48 h with scaling and necrosis
- 25 %: at 24 h scoring in both animals moderate and confluent erythema (score 2), at 48 h scoring one animals with discrete or patchy erythema (score 1) with scaling and one animals with moderate and confluent erythema (score 2) with scaling and necrosis
- 15, 10 and 5 %: at 24 and 48 h scoring discrete or patchy erythema (score 1), at 48 h with scaling
- 1 %: at 24 and 48 h scoring no visible changes
Main study:
- Induction:
-- intradermal: The expected and common findings were observed in the control and test group after the different applications using FCA intradermally. These findings consisted of erythema, oedema, necrotizing dermatitis, encrustation and exfoliation of encrustation.
-- epicutaneous: No erythematous or oedematous reaction was observed in the animals treated with PEG 300 only. Discrete or patchy (score 1) to moderate and confluent (score 2) erythema was observed in all animals at the 24- and 48 -hour scorings after treatment with the test item at 10% in PEG 300; in detail at 24 h scoring 8/10 animals with discrete or patchy erythema (score 1), 2/10 animals with moderate and confluent erythema (score 2), at 48 h scoring 9/10 animals with discrete or patchy erythema (score 1), 1/10 animals with moderate and confluent erythema (score 2). Scaling was observed in 70% of the test animals at the 48-hour reading.
- Challenge
-- test group: Discrete or patchy erythema (score 1) was observed in 1/10 of the test animals at the 24-hour scoring after treated with the test item at 1% in PEG 300. No local skin reaction was observed at the 48-hour scoring.
No skin reactions were observed in the test animals when treated with PEG 300 only.
-- control group: No skin reactions were observed in the animals when treated with PEG 300 alone or when treated with the test item at 1% in PEG 300.
OTHER OBSERVATIONS
- Viability / Mortality: There were no deaths during the course of the study, hence no necropsies were performed.
- Clinical Signs: No signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals.
- Body Weights: The body weight of the animals was within the range commonly recorded for animals of this strain and age.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test susbtnace is not a skin senstiser.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the skin sensitisation potential of the test substance, 'di-C16-18 and C18-unsatd. AAEMIM-MS' (active: 100%) using Guinea Pig Maximisation test (GPMT) method, according to OECD Guideline 406, in compliance with GLP. A pre-test was conducted to determine non-irritating concentrations to be used in the main study. The sensitivity of the test system was assessed by use of the positive control substance Alpha-exylcinnamaldehyde. In the main test, one treated group of ten male Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs received 0.5% of test substance in a PEG 300 and in an emulsion of Freund’s Complete Adjuvant (FCA)/physiological saline (50/50, w/w), on Day 1 by intradermal injections in the nuchal region and 48 h topical applications of 10% in PEG 300 on Day 8, under occlusive conditions. A control group of five male guinea pigs were intradermally induced with PEG 300 and FCA/physiological saline on Day 1 and epidermally induced with PEG 300 under occlusion on Day 8. Two weeks after epidermal induction the control and test animals were challenged by epidermal application of the test substance at 1% in PEG 300 and PEG 300 alone under occlusive dressing. Cutaneous reactions were evaluated at 24 and 48 h after removal of the dressing. No toxic signs were evident in the guinea pigs of the control or test group. No deaths occurred. Ten percent of the test animals showed discrete or patchy erythema at the 24 h scoring after the challenge treatment with test substance at 1% (w/v) in PEG 300; at the 48 h scoring the 10 animals were free of skin reactions. None of the 5 control animals showed skin reactions at challenge. Under the study conditions, the test substance is not a skin sensitizer (Arcelin, 2009).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)