Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Closed Epicutaneous Test
Author:
M. ISHIHARA et al.
Year:
1986
Bibliographic source:
Hifu 28: 230–240

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
(not referenced in the publication)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
see ´principles of method if other than guideline´
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Relevant deviations from OECD TG 406:
- 10 animals used i.s.o. 20 as prescribed for non-sensitizing substances
- Inducton concentraton = 30% = highest non-irritant conc. i.s.o. conc. that exerts mild to moderate irritation
- Multple inductons: 6 times over 2 weeks, i.s.o. single induction

Limited information on results, only tabulated outcome per substance, no individual findings available.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
other: closed epicutaneous test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The REACH Annex VII information requirements were revised in 2016 to endorse a battery of in vitro assays for skin sensitisation. The in vivo closed epicutaneous test was conducted prior to the validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative methods.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Ethyl salicylate
EC Number:
204-265-5
EC Name:
Ethyl salicylate
Cas Number:
118-61-6
Molecular formula:
C9H10O3
IUPAC Name:
ethyl 2-hydroxybenzoate
Test material form:
liquid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Test animals:
Female albino Hartley guinea pigs (Shizuoka Agricultural Cooperative Association for Laboratory Animals), 300 – 350 g body weight

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
30%
Day(s)/duration:
48 H, 3 times a week for 2 weeks
Adequacy of induction:
other: maximum non-irritative concentration
Challenge
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
1%
Day(s)/duration:
48 h
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No. of animals per dose:
10 – 20 guinea pigs per group
Details on study design:
Preparation of the test animals:
Both flanks are clipped using an electric clipper and shaved using an electric shaver
The nape area of 2.5 cm quartet is clipped and shaved

Application of the test material (induction):
- 20 mg of test material (base material: white petrolatum) at 6 concentrations (30 – 0.1%) is smeared to Finn Chamber (EpitestFinn Chamber on Scanpol Tape) and placed on both flanks
- Two strips of adhesive tape, approximate 5 cm width and approximate 40cm length, are wrapped around the animal completely covering the Finn chamber
- A Reston foam pad, approximate 1.5 cm width, 6 cm length and 1cm thickness, is placed over the Finn chambers
- Reston foam pad is fixed with a strip of adhesive tape, approximate 7.5 cm width and approximate 40 cm length, and then Reston foam pad is fixed again with two strips of adhesive tape, approximate 5 cm width and approximate 40 cm length
- Closed application is continued for 48 hours, and irritation response is judged at 1, 24 and 48 hours after removal of test material.
- Above procedures are repeated totally 6 times, 3 times per week (on Monday, Wednesday and Friday) for 2 weeks.

Application of the test material (challenge):
- After 2-week withdrawal period, closed application of test material is performed on both flanks at several concentrations below the irritation concentration for 2 days for challenging similarly as in irritation test
- Approximate 50 mg of the test material at the minimum irritation concentration or maximum non-irritation concentration is spread homogeneously on the cloth of patch plaster and then the patch is applied on the nape
- Adhesive tape, approximate 2.5 cm width and approximate 30cm length, is wrapped around the nape to secure the patch plaster
- Approximate 2.0 cm quartet Reston foam pad is placed on the patch plaster
- Reston foam pad is fixed with a single strip of adhesive tape, approximate 2.5 cm width and approximate 30 cm length

Challenge controls:
not specified
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
not applicable

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results
Key result
Reading:
other: summary
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30% (induction) / 1% (challenge)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In the present Closed Epicutaneous Test (CET) the test substance was not sensitizing
Executive summary:

A Closed Epicutaneous Test (CET) was performed on 10 to 20 female guinea pigs to determine the sensitizing potential of the test substance in petrolatum.

The test was not performed according to a guideline but resembles the OECD TG 406 and it was not performed according to GLP.

The method description is rather detailed, with some details missing. The information on the results is limited and no individual findings are available.

In the induction phase of the Closed Epicutaneous Test. (CET), the test material was applied occluded for 48 hours at the highest non-irritative concentration (30%) on the shaved nape and this procedure is repeated three times per week for two weeks.

FoIlowing a two-week rest period, the test material is applied at the maximum non-irritative concentration (1%) under occlusion for 48 hours on the flanks for chaIlenge.

This resulted in no indication of sensitization (rate: 0/10).

In the present Closed Epicutaneous Test (CET) the test substance was not sensitizing