Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
other: Structural assessment
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The Log octanol-water partition coefficient (log P) of the test material was estimated using the Log Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient Program (KOWWIN version 1.68, US EPA).
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
No laboratory work was performed in this study. GLP is therefore not required.
Type of method:
calculation method (fragments)
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
-3.58
Remarks on result:
other: Component 1
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
-2.6
Remarks on result:
other: Component 2
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
-1.62
Remarks on result:
other: Component 3
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
-0.63
Remarks on result:
other: Component 4
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
0.35
Remarks on result:
other: Component 5

Table 1: Constituent 1

Type

Number

Fragment Description

Coefficient

Value

Frag

1

-CH3   [aliphatic carbon]

0.5473

0.5473

Frag

14

-CH2-  [aliphatic carbon]

0.4911

6.8754

Frag

1

-CH    [aliphatic carbon]

0.3614

0.3614

Frag

3

-OH    [hydroxy, aliphatic attach]

-1.4086

-4.2258

Frag

1

-NH-   [aliphatic attach]

-1.4962

-1.4962

Frag

1

-COOH  [acid, aliphatic attach]

-0.6895

-0.6895

Frag

1

-C(=O)O [ester, aliphatic attach

-0.9505

-0.9505

Frag

1

-C(=O)N [aliphatic attach]

-0.5236

-0.5236

Frag

1

-O-N [oxygen, nitrogen attach]

0.2352

0.2352

Frag

1

>N< [+5 valence; single bonds; no H attach]

-6.6000

-6.6000

Frag

1

{-O- or -S-} to nitrogen (+5 valence)]

1.7500**

1.7500

Factor

1

Multi-alcohol correction

0.4064

0.4064

Factor

1

-O-CO-C-N-CO- [no aromatic attach] cor.

0.5000

0.5000

Constant

1

Equation Constant

 

0.2290

**=An estimated coefficient used

Table 2: Constituent 2

Type

Number

Fragment Description

Coefficient

Value

Frag

1

-CH3   [aliphatic carbon]

0.5473

0.5473

Frag

16

-CH2-  [aliphatic carbon]

0.4911

7.8576

Frag

1

-CH    [aliphatic carbon]

0.3614

0.3614

Frag

3

-OH    [hydroxy, aliphatic attach]

-1.4086

-4.2258

Frag

1

-NH-   [aliphatic attach]

-1.4962

-1.4962

Frag

1

-COOH  [acid, aliphatic attach]

-0.6895

-0.6895

Frag

1

-C(=O)O [ester, aliphatic attach

-0.9505

-0.9505

Frag

1

-C(=O)N [aliphatic attach]

-0.5236

-0.5236

Frag

1

-O-N [oxygen, nitrogen attach]

0.2352

0.2352

Frag

1

>N< [+5 valence; single bonds; no H attach]

-6.6000

-6.6000

Frag

1

{-O- or -S-} to nitrogen (+5 valence)]

1.7500**

1.7500

Factor

1

Multi-alcohol correction

0.4064

0.4064

Factor

1

-O-CO-C-N-CO- [no aromatic attach] cor.

0.5000

0.5000

Constant

1

Equation Constant

 

0.2290

**=An estimated coefficient used

Table 3: Constituent 3

Type

Number

Fragment Description

Coefficient

Value

Frag

1

-CH3   [aliphatic carbon]

0.5473

0.5473

Frag

18

-CH2-  [aliphatic carbon]

0.4911

8.8398

Frag

1

-CH    [aliphatic carbon]

0.3614

0.3614

Frag

3

-OH    [hydroxy, aliphatic attach]

-1.4086

-4.2258

Frag

1

-NH-   [aliphatic attach]

-1.4962

-1.4962

Frag

1

-COOH  [acid, aliphatic attach]

-0.6895

-0.6895

Frag

1

-C(=O)O [ester, aliphatic attach

-0.9505

-0.9505

Frag

1

-C(=O)N [aliphatic attach]

-0.5236

-0.5236

Frag

1

-O-N [oxygen, nitrogen attach]

0.2352

0.2352

Frag

1

>N< [+5 valence; single bonds; no H attach]

-6.6000

-6.6000

Frag

1

{-O- or -S-} to nitrogen (+5 valence)]

1.7500**

1.7500

Factor

1

Multi-alcohol correction

0.4064

0.4064

Factor

1

-O-CO-C-N-CO- [no aromatic attach] cor.

0.5000

0.5000

Constant

1

Equation Constant

 

0.2290

**=An estimated coefficient used

Table 4: Constituent 4

Type

Number

Fragment Description

Coefficient

Value

Frag

1

-CH3   [aliphatic carbon]

0.5473

0.5473

Frag

20

-CH2-  [aliphatic carbon]

0.4911

9.8220

Frag

1

-CH    [aliphatic carbon]

0.3614

0.3614

Frag

3

-OH    [hydroxy, aliphatic attach]

-1.4086

-4.2258

Frag

1

-NH-   [aliphatic attach]

-1.4962

-1.4962

Frag

1

-COOH  [acid, aliphatic attach]

-0.6895

-0.6895

Frag

1

-C(=O)O [ester, aliphatic attach

-0.9505

-0.9505

Frag

1

-C(=O)N [aliphatic attach]

-0.5236

-0.5236

Frag

1

-O-N [oxygen, nitrogen attach]

0.2352

0.2352

Frag

1

>N< [+5 valence; single bonds; no H attach]

-6.6000

-6.6000

Frag

1

{-O- or -S-} to nitrogen (+5 valence)]

1.7500**

1.7500

Factor

1

Multi-alcohol correction

0.4064

0.4064

Factor

1

-O-CO-C-N-CO- [no aromatic attach] cor.

0.5000

0.5000

Constant

1

Equation Constant

 

0.2290

**=An estimated coefficient used

Table 5: Constituent 5

Type

Number

Fragment Description

Coefficient

Value

Frag

1

-CH3   [aliphatic carbon]

0.5473

0.5473

Frag

22

-CH2-  [aliphatic carbon]

0.4911

10.8042

Frag

1

-CH    [aliphatic carbon]

0.3614

0.3614

Frag

3

-OH    [hydroxy, aliphatic attach]

-1.4086

-4.2258

Frag

1

-NH-   [aliphatic attach]

-1.4962

-1.4962

Frag

1

-COOH  [acid, aliphatic attach]

-0.6895

-0.6895

Frag

1

-C(=O)O [ester, aliphatic attach

-0.9505

-0.9505

Frag

1

-C(=O)N [aliphatic attach]

-0.5236

-0.5236

Frag

1

-O-N [oxygen, nitrogen attach]

0.2352

0.2352

Frag

1

>N< [+5 valence; single bonds; no H attach]

-6.6000

-6.6000

Frag

1

{-O- or -S-} to nitrogen (+5 valence)]

1.7500**

1.7500

Factor

1

Multi-alcohol correction

0.4064

0.4064

Factor

1

-O-CO-C-N-CO- [no aromatic attach] cor.

0.5000

0.5000

Constant

1

Equation Constant

 

0.2290

**=An estimated coefficient used

Conclusions:
The log Pow for constituent 1 was estimated to be -3.5809.
The log Pow for constituent 2 was estimated to be -2.5987.
The log Pow for constituent 3 was estimated to be -1.6165.
The log Pow for constituent 4 was estimated to be -0.6343.
The log Pow for constituent 5 was estimated to be 0.3479.
Executive summary:

The Log octanol-water partition coefficient (log P) of the test material was estimated using the Log Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient Program (KOWWIN version 1.68, US EPA).

As the test material is made up of multiple constituents with various chain lengths, the log P for the test material has been calculated for each constituent.

The Log Kow has been estimated for the five constituents that make up the test material. As each constituent contains an ionic bond, the structures have been modified slightly to change the ionic bond to a covalent bond, which allows the prediction software to calculate values. As a result, this modification removes the hydrogen from the triethanolic nitrogen atom, giving it a +4 valence rather than a +5 valence as indicated in the tables above. This simplification process is likely to underestimate the Log Kow, as in reality the covalent bond is likely to reduce the substance’s hydrophilicity. The predictions generated clearly demonstrate that all the constituents are hydrophilic, which is expected based on the molecular structures of the constituents.

The log Pow for constituent 1 was estimated to be -3.5809.

The log Pow for constituent 2 was estimated to be -2.5987.

The log Pow for constituent 3 was estimated to be -1.6165.

The log Pow for constituent 4 was estimated to be -0.6343.

The log Pow for constituent 5 was estimated to be 0.3479.

The weighted average Log Kow of the test material is -1.58 and this value has been used to derive Koc.

 

Description of key information

The log Pow for constituent 1 was estimated to be -3.5809.

The log Pow for constituent 2 was estimated to be -2.5987.

The log Pow for constituent 3 was estimated to be -1.6165.

The log Pow for constituent 4 was estimated to be -0.6343.

The log Pow for constituent 5 was estimated to be 0.3479.

For the chemical safety assessment, a weighted average log Pow of -1.58 (assumed at 25°C) was derived, based on the constituents’ calculated log Pow values and their proportion (normalized to 100%) in the substance (see table below).

Constituents

Typical
concentration
based on
HPLC analysis
(%)

Adjusted factors based on typical concentration percentage

Log Pow

Log Pow component

Tris(2-hydroxyethyl)azanium (2S)-4-carboxy-2-octanoamidobutanoate

6.7

0.07

-3.58

-0.26

Tris(2-hydroxyethyl)azanium (2S)-4-carboxy-2-decanamidobutanoate

6.6

0.07

-2.60

-0.19

Tris(2-hydroxyethyl)azanium (2S)-4-carboxy-2-dodecanamidobutanoate

57.2

0.63

-1.62

-1.02

Tris(2-hydroxyethyl)azanium (2S)-4-carboxy-2-tetradecanamidobutanoate

17.2

0.19

-0.63

-0.12

Tris(2-hydroxyethyl)azanium (2S)-4-carboxy-2-hexadecanamidobutanoate

2.9

0.03

0.35

0.01

 

Weighted average Log Pow Component                                                                            -1.58

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
-1.58
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

The Log octanol-water partition coefficient (log P) of the test material was estimated using the Log Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient Program (KOWWIN version 1.68, US EPA).

As the test material is made up of multiple constituents with various chain lengths, the log P for the test material has been calculated for each constituent.

The Log Kow has been estimated for the five constituents that make up the test material. As each constituent contains an ionic bond, the structures have been modified slightly to change the ionic bond to a covalent bond, which allows the prediction software to calculate values. As a result, this modification removes the hydrogen from the triethanolic nitrogen atom, giving it a +4 valence rather than a +5 valence as indicated in the tables above. This simplification process is likely to underestimate the Log Kow, as in reality the covalent bond is likely to reduce the substance’s hydrophilicity. The predictions generated clearly demonstrate that all the constituents are hydrophilic, which is expected based on the molecular structures of the constituents.

The log Pow for constituent 1 was estimated to be -3.5809.

The log Pow for constituent 2 was estimated to be -2.5987.

The log Pow for constituent 3 was estimated to be -1.6165.

The log Pow for constituent 4 was estimated to be -0.6343.

The log Pow for constituent 5 was estimated to be 0.3479.

The weighted average Log Kow of the test material is -1.58 and this value has been used to derive Koc.