Fatty acids, C14-18 and C18-unsatd., branched and linear, esters with pentaerythritol

Endpoint summary

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Effects on fertility

Effect on fertility: via oral route

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Effect on fertility: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Effect on fertility: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Additional information

Reproductive toxicity (fertility) - Data waiving

According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex VIII, 8.7.1., column 2, a Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test is not required as a test for prenatal developmental toxicity (Annex IX, 8.7.2) is available for the structural related substances Fatty acids, C8-10. mixed esters with dipenaterythritol, isooctanoic acid, pentaerythritol and tripentaerythritol (CAS 189200-42-8) and Fatty acids, C5-9 tetraesters with pentaerythritol (CAS 67762-53-2) which will be used for read-across. In the prenatal developmental toxicity study with Fatty acids, C8-10. mixed esters with dipenaterythritol, isooctanoic acid, pentaerythritol and tripentaerythritol (CAS 189200-42-8) performed according to OECD guideline 414 via oral gavage in rats no relevant maternal and developmental toxic effects were recorded up to and including the highest dose tested (1000 mg/kg bw/day). Thus, the NOAEL for maternal and developmental toxicity was considered to be ≥1000 mg/kg bw/day. In another prenatal developmental toxicity study with Fatty acids, C5-9 tetraesters with pentaerythritol (CAS 67762-53-2) performed equivalent or similar to OECD guideline 414 via the dermal route in rats only mild dermal irritation (local) including erythema and flaking of the skin was recorded at maternal animals in the treatment group resulting in a NOAEL (systemic) of 2000 mg/kg bw/day. Fetal examination revealed neither malformations nor variations. Visceral examinations revealed a statistically significant (high dose) and dose-related increase in the number of fetuses with levocardia which was the only parameter affected in fetuses of dams treated with the test substance during gestation. Thus, the developmental NOAEL was determined to be <800 mg/kg bw.

Effects on developmental toxicity

Description of key information

Oral (OECD 414), rat: NOAEL (development, maternal) ≥1000 mg/kg bw/day (RA from CAS 189200-72-7)

Dermal (OECD 414), rat: NOAEL (maternal) = 2000 mg/kg bw/day, NOAEL (developmental) <800 mg/kg bw/day, LOAEL (developmental) = 800 mg/kg bw/day (RA from CAS 67762-53-2)

Link to relevant study records

Reference

Reference 1

Endpoint:

developmental toxicity

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

03 Oct - 08 Nov 1994

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restricitions (Lack of data on test substance).

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)

Deviations:

yes

Remarks:

- lack of data on test substance

GLP compliance:

yes

Limit test:

no

Species:

rat

Strain:

other: Crl:CD BR VAF/Plus

Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Stone Ridge, NY, USA
- Age at study initiation: approximately 9 - 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 200 - 274 g (female)
- Housing: The animals were housed in suspended stainless steel and wire mesh cages with absorbent paper below the cages. The females were housed separately during the study period except during mating.
- Diet: Purina Certified Rodent Chow No. 5002, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 13 d

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20.0 - 24.4
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 03 Oct 1994 To: 08 Nov 1994

Route of administration:

oral: gavage

Vehicle:

other: polyethylene glycol (PEG 400)

Details on exposure:

PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The undiluted test substance was thoroughly mixed in vehicle prior to dispensing. The dosing solutions were prepared weekly.

VEHICLE
- Lot/batch no.: 122H1109
- Physical state: colorless liquid

Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:

yes

Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:

Analysis for homogeneity of the test substance dilutions were performed on the lowest and the highest concentrations expected during the course of the study. The relative standard deviation ranged from 0.72 to 3.19%. Concentrations were analysed in the first and the third dosing mixture preparation. The analytical results for all test solutions were within 7% of the nominal concentrations for weeks 1 and 3.

Details on mating procedure:

- Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Verification of same strain and source of both sexes: yes
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug and/or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
After confirmation of pregnancy, each mated female was returned to its cage and new females were placed into the males' cages until a required number of pregnant females were obtained.

Duration of treatment / exposure:

gestation days (GD) 6 - 15

Frequency of treatment:

daily, 7 d/week

Duration of test:

21 d (GD 0 - 21)

Remarks:

Doses / Concentrations:
100, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d
Basis:
actual ingested

No. of animals per sex per dose:

25 females per dose, 50 males in total

Control animals:

yes, concurrent vehicle

Details on study design:

- Rationale for animal assignment: Mated females were assigned to dose groups in the order of mating. Accordingly, the first confirmed mated female was assigned to Group 1, the next to Group 2 and so on until all mated animals for a given day were assigned to dose groups. On subsequent days, the next group in sequence was filled by the first confirmed mated female on that day and so on. Assignments were made until all groups were filled with confirmed mated females.

Maternal examinations:

CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily during the treatment period and once daily at all other times during the study period

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: prior to selection and daily during gestation

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: prior to selection and on GD 0, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21

FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: concurrently with body weight examinations

POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on GD 21
- all females were examined by gross necropsy

Ovaries and uterine content:

The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes

Fetal examinations:

- External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: Yes: half per litter

Statistics:

Bartlett's Test was performed to determine if the dose groups had equal variance (1% level of significance). If equal, the testing was done using parametric methods, otherwise nonparametric techniques were used. Parametric procedures: a standard one way ANOVA (F distribution) was used. If significant differences among the means were indicated, Dunnett's Test was used to determine which treatment groups differed significantly from control. In addition to the ANOVA, a standard regression analysis for linear response in the dose groups was performed that also tested for linear lack of fit in the model. Nonparametric procedures: the test of equality of means was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. If significant differences among the means were indicated, Dunn's Summed Rank Test was used to determine which treatment groups differed significantly from the control. In addition, Jonckheere's Test for monotonic trend in the dose response was performed. All tests were conducted at the 5% and 1% level of significance. Fetal weight was analyzed by a standard nested analysis of covariance (fetuses nested within dams and dams nested within doses and litter size (both sexes combined)). If differences in groups were identified, the Least Significant Difference technique was used to determine which groups differed from the control group. Male and female fetuses were tested separately (the covariate was combined sexes in each analysis). Fetal malformation and variation incidence data were analyzed for statistical significance as follows: a standard chi-square analysis was performed to determine if the proportions of incidences differ between the groups tested. If anyone cell had an expected value less than 5, this step was not reported. Next, each treatment group was compared to the control group using a 2x2 Fisher Exact Test. Thirdly, Armitage's test for linear trend in the dosage groups was performed. All tests were reported at the 5% or 1% level of significance.

Indices:

Pre-implantation loss = (no. of Corpora Lutea - no. of Implantation Sites) / no. of Corpora Lutea * 100
Post-implantation loss = (no. of Implantation Sites - no. of live fetuses) / no. of Implantation Sites * 100

Details on maternal toxic effects:

Maternal toxic effects:no effects

Details on maternal toxic effects:
Mortality:
No treatment-related mortality occurred. On GD 7, one female of the 500 mg/kg bw/d group was found dead. At necropsy, discolored and consolidated lungs were the only findings. The death of this female was probably a result of an accidental gavage error.

Clinical signs:
No treatment-related clinical signs were observed during the study period. The most frequently observation was soft stool, that occurred in treated and control animals and was therefore considered as a response to the vehicle rather than to the test substance. Other findings were scabs, little sign of stool, rales and alopecia in one or more groups. One female of the high dose group had a subcutis mass in the cervical area on GD 21. In summary, these clinical findings were considered to be incidental and unrelated to treatment with the test substance.

Body weight:
Treatment with the test substance had no statistically significant effect on mean body weight and mean body weight change at any interval.

Food consumption:
There were no statistically significant differences in mean food consumption between treated and control animals at any interval.

Post-mortem examinations:
There were no necropsy findings that were considered to be treatment-related. One high dose female had a subcutaneous mass in the cervical area and one control and one high dose female had dilated renal pelvis. In summary, these necropsy findings were considered to be incidental and unrelated to treatment.

Key result

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

Remarks:

maternal

Effect level:

>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)

Based on:

test mat.

Basis for effect level:

other: No adverse effects observed

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:

Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects: no effects

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Fetal body weight:
There were no statistically significant differences between treated and control mean fetal body weights of either sex (see Table 1).

Implantation data:
There were no statistically significant differences in the mean live fetuses, mean live male or female fetuses, mean resorptions, mean implantation sites, mean corpora lutea, mean total dead fetuses, mean fetuses per implantation sites, mean dead fetuses per implantation sites, mean resorptions per implantation sites, % pre-implantation loss, % post-implantation loss, mean malformed fetuses, mean fetuses with variations, or mean affected (resorptions + dead + malformed fetuses per litter) fetuses between treated and control groups. (see Table 1)

Fetal observations:
No biologically or statistically significant differences in total or individual variations or malformations were observed between the litters of test substance groups and control group (see Table 2). In the control, 100, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d group, 5, 2, 6 and 1 fetuses, respectively, were stunted. External observations regarded as malformations were found in one fetus of the 100 mg/kg bw/d group (agnathia, astomia, low set ears, anophthalmia) and single findings of cleft palate, syndactyly and kinked tail in three fetuses of separate litters of the 500 mg/kg bw/d group. External variations were not observed in any group. Visceral observations regarded as malformations were limited to single occurrences of anophthalmia in one fetus each of the low and mid dose group, cleft palate and dilated brain ventricles in the 100 mg/kg bw/d group and two occurrences of folded retina in the control group. Visceral variations included a single or low incidence of dilated renal pelves, distended ureters and/or convoluted ureter. Skeletal observations regarded as malformations were limited to multiple skull bones malformed in one fetus of the 100 mg/kg bw/d group, short pubis in one fetus of the 1000 mg/kg bw/d group and one less presacral vertebrae in one fetus of the control, two fetuses in the low dose and one fetus in the high dose groups. Skeletal variations were observed throughout the groups and consisted primarily of hypoplastic, misshapen or unossified stemebrae, hypoplastic skull bones or pubis and rudimentary or misshapen ribs. In summary and without a clear pattern of response, all malformations were considered incidental and not to be treatment-related. Statistically significant differences in incidences of variations were limited to a decrease in hypoplastic skull bones of the mid dose group and a decrease in unossified stemebrae of the high dose group compared with controls. All variations were of no biological importance.

Skeletal ossification:
There were no statistically significant differences in mean ossification sites between treated and control groups.

Key result

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

Effect level:

>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)

Based on:

test mat.

Sex:

male/female

Basis for effect level:

other: No adverse effects observed

Key result

Abnormalities:

not specified

Developmental effects observed:

not specified

Table 1: Litter data and fetal body weight

	Control	dose groups [mg/kg bw/day]
		100	500	1000
No. of dams/litters examined	25	21	23	25
Mean no. of Corpora Lutea	16.8	16.8	17.7	16.8
	± 2.28	± 2.50	± 3.50	± 1.82
	n=25	n=20	n=23	n=25
Mean no. of Implantation Sites	15.76	15.9	16.09	15.52
	± 2.24	± 2.62	± 2.25	± 2.49
	n=25	n=21	n=23	n=25
Mean no. of resorptions	0.88	0.81	0.91	0.56
	± 1.05	± 1.29	± 1.12	± 0.82
	n=25	n=21	n=23	n=25
Pre-implantation loss [%]	5.7	6.7	8	7.7
	± 8.1	± 8.2	± 8.2	± 12.9
	n=25	n=20	n=23	n=25
Post-implantation loss per litter [%]	5.4	4.9	6	4.4
	± 6.4	± 7.7	± 7.3	± 6.4
	n=25	n=21	n=23	n=25
Mean no. of live fetuses	14.88	15.1	15.13	14.88
	± 2.19	± 2.64	± 2.46	± 2.64
	n=25	n=21	n=23	n=25
Mean no. of dead fetuses	0	0	0.04	0.08
			± 0.21	± 0.28
	n=25	n=21	n=23	n=25
Mean no. of female fetuses	7.72	7.48	8.04	7.8
	± 2.28	± 3.11	± 2.29	± 1.78
	n=25	n=21	n=23	n=25
Mean no. of male fetuses	7.16	7.62	7.09	7.08
	± 1.93	± 2.25	± 2.09	± 2.58
	n=25	n=21	n=23	n=25
Mean body weight (female fetuses) (g)	5.04	5.05	5.06	5.2
	± 0.44	± 0.32	± 0.46	± 0.37
	n=188	n=157	n=185	n=195
Mean body weight (male fetuses) (g)	5.33	5.27	5.39	5.44
	± 0.52	± 0.39	± 0.38	± 0.38
	n=175	n=160	n=163	n=177

Table 2: Fetal variations and malformations

	Control	dose groups [mg/kg bw/day]
		100	500	1000
No. of fetuses with external variations	0	0	0	0
	n=372	n=317	n=347	n=358
No. of fetuses with external malformations	0	1	3	0
	n=372	n=317	n=347	n=358
No. of fetuses with visceral or head variations	0	0	1	2
	n=187	n=161	n=173	n=186/187*
No. of fetuses with visceral or head malformations	2	2	1	0
	n=187	n=161	n=173	n=186/187*
No. of fetuses with skeletal variations	45	39	29	35
	n=185	n=156	n=176	n=185
No. of fetuses with skeletal malformations	1	3	0	2
	n=185	n=156	n=176	n=185

*186 visceral examinations performed, 187 head examinations performed

Conclusions:

The test substance was not considered embryotoxic under the conditions of this study. Accordingly, the maternal and developmental NOAELs were established at 1000 mg/kg bw/d under the conditions of this study. The results indicate that test substance was not a selective developmental toxicant and was not embryotoxic or teratogenic under the conditions of this study.

Reference 2

Endpoint:

developmental toxicity

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

supporting study

Reliability:

2 (reliable with restrictions)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions (15 dams per group instead of 20, administration on day 0-19 of gestation, limited details on study design)

Qualifier:

equivalent or similar to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)

Deviations:

yes

Remarks:

(only 15 presumed pregnant females per group, exposure on day 0-19 of gestation, only 2 dose levels, nonstandard dermal exposure, limited details on exposure)

GLP compliance:

no

Limit test:

no

Species:

rat

Strain:

Sprague-Dawley

Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Kingston, N.Y.
- Age at study initiation: approx. 9 weeks
- Mean weight at study initiation: 248 g
- Diet: Purina Certified Rodent Chow #5002 (Meal), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 2 weeks

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 22
- Humidity (%): 40 - 60
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Route of administration:

dermal

Vehicle:

unchanged (no vehicle)

Details on exposure:

TEST SITE
- Type of wrap if used: open exposure, no wrap
- Time intervals for shavings or clippings: no data on frequency; clipped, intact skin
- Site: dorsal
Controls: The rats of the control group were clipped and collared. The intact dorsal skin of each rat was stroked with the tip of a syringe, but no test material was applied.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): The amount of the test material applied with a syringe was calculated based on the body weight of the animals and the density of the test substance.

USE OF RESTRAINERS FOR PREVENTING INGESTION: yes. To minimize ingestion of the test material, the rats were fitted with cardboard Elizabethan-style collars.

Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:

no

Details on mating procedure:

- Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused: M/F ratio per cage: 1/1
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy

Duration of treatment / exposure:

gestation days 0 - 19

Frequency of treatment:

daily

Duration of test:

The animals were sacrificed on day 20 of gestation.

Dose / conc.:

800 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)

Dose / conc.:

2 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)

No. of animals per sex per dose:

15 presumed-pregnant females

Control animals:

yes, concurrent no treatment

Details on study design:

- Dose selection rationale: based on results of a 13-week dermal study previously conducted with the same material

Maternal examinations:

CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: at least once daily
- Cage side observations checked: signs of pathosis, abortion, premature delivery, and death

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: day 0, 3, 6, 10, 13, 16, and 20 of gestation

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE: Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes
- Time schedule for calculation: days 0-3, 3-6, 6-10, 10-13, 13-16, and 16-20

POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20
- Organs examined: The thoracic and abdominal cavities were exposed and all organs were examined grossly for evidence of pathosis.

OTHER:
- Clinical chemistry: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, albumin/globulin ration, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin, calcium, chloride, cholesterol, creatinine, globulin, glucose, iron, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), phosphorus, potassium, sodium, sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH), total protein, triglycerides, urea nitrogen, and uric acid

Ovaries and uterine content:

The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Number of live and dead fetuses: Yes
- Other: The ovaries of non-pregnant females were grossly examined and then discarded.

Fetal examinations:

- External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: No

Statistics:

- Analysis of variances and group comparison using Fisher's Exact or Dunnett's test (maternal biophase and cesarean section data, and fetal data)
- ANOVA and Fisher's Exact test (fetal skeletal data)
- Fisher's Exact test (fetal visceral data)
- SAS procdures, Student-Newman-Keul's multiple comparison test (clinical chemistry data)
P < 0.05

Details on maternal toxic effects:

Maternal toxic effects: yes. Remark: slight local effects

Details on maternal toxic effects:
- General observations: neck lesions, red nasal exudate, and chromodacryorrhea in all groups (considered not to be test substance-related as these signs are common in animals that are collared)
- Local effects: mild dermal irritation including erythema and flaking of the skin in the treatment groups
- Body weight: similar to controls in both treatment groups
- Body weight gain: similar to controls in both treatment groups
- Uterine and net body weights: similar to controls in both treatment groups
- Food consumption: similar to control in both treatment groups; only difference (statistically significant) in high dose group on day 13-16: 31.5 g vs. 29.5 g (corresponding control data)
- Necropsy: no remarkable findings were observed
- Fetal status and uterine position: no parameter evaluated appeared to be adversly affected
- Clinical chemistry: no differences between treated and non-treated rats were observed

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

Remarks:

maternal

Effect level:

2 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)

Based on:

test mat.

Basis for effect level:

other: No adverse effects observed; slight local dermal irritation

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:

Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects: no effects

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Fetal body measurements: Mean fetal body weights and crown-rump lengths, parameters of body growth and development were normal compared to controls.
- Fetal examination: No malformations or variations were observed. Bruises were observed on the skin of 4 fetuses from the control group and 2 fetuses form the 800 mg/kg bw/day group (considered to be incidental). One fetus from one dam exposed to 800 mg/kg bw/day was pale in colour. No other remarkable findings were observed during external examination.
- Malformations (lumbar and sacral vertebrae, tail, sternebrae, and ribs) were observed. The incidence was low and there was no apparent dose-response relationship, these effects were considered to be not treatment-related. Comparable incidences of variant skeletal development were observed in both control and treated fetuses.
- Visceral examinations: A statistically significant (high dose) increase in the number of fetuses with levocardia was observed. The response appeared to be dose-related
Levocardia:
Litters: control: 0 (0%); 800 mg/kg bw/day: 2 (14.3%); 2000 mg/kg bw/day: 7 (50%); 14 litters per group examined
Fetuses: control: 0 (0%); 800 mg/kg bw/day: 3 (3.2%); 2000 mg/kg bw/day: 7 (10.1%); 94, 93, and 99 fetuses examined, respectively
Microphthalmia, anophtalmia and "apparent" hydronephrosis were also observed. Variant visceral development was observed in control and treated fetuses.

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

Remarks:

developmental

Effect level:

< 800 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)

Based on:

test mat.

Sex:

male/female

Basis for effect level:

other: Adverse effect observed

Dose descriptor:

LOAEL

Remarks:

developmental

Effect level:

800 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)

Based on:

test mat.

Sex:

male/female

Basis for effect level:

other: Increased number of fetuses with levocardia

Abnormalities:

not specified

Developmental effects observed:

not specified

Levocardia was the only parameter affected in fetuses of dams treated with the test substance during gestation. In other studies, levocardia was observed in control fetuses, too. However, the effect of the test substance on heart development should be focused on in further studies as well as the impact, this effect has on postnatal survival.

Conclusions:

In a developmental toxicity study, pregnant rats were dermally exposed to the test substance. No adverse effects were observed in any maternal or reproductive parameter nor on external and skeletal development of fetuses. Levocardia was observed in 3.2% and 10.1% of the fetuses exposed in utero to 800 and 2000 mg/kg bw /day, respectively. Thus, the developmental NOAEL was determined to be < 800 mg/kg bw.

Reference 3

Endpoint:

developmental toxicity

Type of information:

read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)

Adequacy of study:

key study

Justification for type of information:

Please refer to the Additional Information field in the endpoint study summary

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

Reason / purpose for cross-reference:

read-across source

Key result

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

Remarks:

maternal

Effect level:

>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)

Based on:

test mat.

Basis for effect level:

other: No adverse effects observed

Remarks on result:

other: Exxon, 1995

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

Remarks:

maternal

Effect level:

2 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)

Based on:

test mat.

Basis for effect level:

other: No adverse effect observed

Remarks on result:

other: Exxon, 1988

Key result

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

Remarks:

developmental

Effect level:

>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)

Based on:

test mat.

Sex:

male/female

Basis for effect level:

other: No adverse effects observed

Remarks on result:

other: Exxon. 1995

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

Remarks:

developmental

Effect level:

< 800 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)

Based on:

test mat.

Sex:

male/female

Basis for effect level:

other: Adverse effect observed

Remarks on result:

other: Exxon, 1988

Dose descriptor:

LOAEL

Remarks:

developmental

Effect level:

800 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)

Based on:

test mat.

Sex:

male/female

Basis for effect level:

other: Increased number of fetuses with levocardia

Remarks on result:

other: Exxon, 1988

Key result

Abnormalities:

not specified

Key result

Developmental effects observed:

not specified

Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route

Endpoint conclusion:

no adverse effect observed

Dose descriptor:

NOAEL

1 000 mg/kg bw/day

Study duration:

subacute

Species:

rat

Quality of whole database:

The available information comprises an adequate and reliable study (Klimisch score 2) from a reference substance with similar structure and intrinsic properties. Read-across is justified based on common functional group(s), common precursors/breakdown products, similarities in PC/ECO/TOX properties (refer to endpoint discussion for further details). The selected study is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII-IX, 8.7, in accordance with Annex XI, 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion:

no study available

Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion:

adverse effect observed

Dose descriptor:

LOAEL

800 mg/kg bw/day

Study duration:

subacute

Species:

rat

Quality of whole database:

The available information comprises an adequate and reliable study (Klimisch score 2) from a reference substance with similar structure and intrinsic properties. Read-across is justified based on common functional group(s), common precursors/breakdown products, similarities in PC/ECO/TOX properties (refer to endpoint discussion for further details). The selected study is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII-IX, 8.7, in accordance with Annex XI, 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

Additional information

Justification for read-across

There is no data available addressing toxicity to reproduction of Fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered) and C18-unsatd., branched and linear, tri- and tetraesters with pentaerythritol (CAS 85186-72-7). In accordance with Article 13 (1) of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, "information on intrinsic properties of substances may be generated by means other than tests, provided that the conditions set out in Annex XI are met.” In particular for human toxicity, information shall be generated whenever possible by means other than vertebrate animal tests, which includes the use of information from structurally related substances (grouping or read-across).

 

Having regard to the general rules for the read-across approach laid down in Annex XI, Item 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 whereby substances may be predicted as similar provided that their physicochemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties are likely to be similar or follow a comparable pattern as a result of structural similarity, the substances Fatty acids, C8-10. mixed esters with dipenaterythritol, isooctanoic acid, pentaerythritol and tripentaerythritol (CAS 189200-42-8) and Fatty acids, C5-9 tetraesters with pentaerythritol (CAS 67762-53-2) are selected as source substance.

 

Developmental toxicity/teratogenicity

CAS 189200-42-8

The developmental toxicity of Fatty acids C8-10, mixed esters with dipentaerythritol, isooctanoic acid, pentaerythritol and tripentaerythritol (CAS 189200-42-8) was investigated according to OECD guideline 414 (prenatal developmental toxicity study) and under GLP conditions (Exxon 1995). 50 male Sprague-Dawley rats were mated with females to achieve groups of 25 pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats which then received daily oral gavage doses of the test substance at concentrations of 100, 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day during gestational days 6 to 15. Control animals received the vehicle polyethylene glycol (PEG 400). On day 21 of gestation the animals were euthanized and examined for maternal and fetal parameters. There were no adverse effects found for all parameters examined in maternal animals. Based on the number of implantations, number of total litter losses by resorption, mortality, clinical signs, body weight, gross pathology and organ weights of maternal animals the NOAEL for maternal toxicity was found to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Examination of fetus litter size and weights, offspring viability (number alive and number dead), sex ratio, grossly visible abnormalities, external, head, soft tissue and skeletal abnormalities showed only incidental malformations in two high dose females. The NOAEL for embryo-/fetotoxicity and teratogenicity in rats for Fatty acids C8-10, mixed esteres with dipentaerythritol, isooctanoic acid, pentaerythritol and tridipentaerythritol was found to be greater than 1000 mg/kg bw/day.

 

CAS 67762-53-2 

The developmental toxicity of Fatty acids, C5-9, tetraesters with pentaerythritol (CAS 67762-53-2) was investigated comparable to OECD guideline 414 (prenatal developmental toxicity study) (Exxon, 1988). Groups of 15 presumed pregnant female Sprague-Dawley rats received daily dermal doses of the test substance at concentrations of 800 and 2000 mg/kg bw/day during gestational days 0 to 19. Control animals remained untreated. On day 20 of gestation the animals were euthanized and examined for maternal and fetal parameters. There were no adverse effects found for all parameters examined in maternal animals. Based on the number of implantations, number of total litter losses by resorption, mortality, clinical signs, body weight, gross pathology and organ weights of maternal animals the NOAEL for maternal toxicity was found to be 2000 mg/kg bw/day. Examination of fetus litter size and weights, offspring viability (number alive and number dead), sex ratio, grossly visible abnormalities, external, head, soft tissue and skeletal abnormalities revealed no differences to controls and thus no indication for teratogenic effects. The only effect found was a dose-dependently increased number of fetuses with levocardia, although no hearth malformations have been detected. Furthermore levocardia was observed in vehicle control fetuses (Smith et al. 1988) and in the control fetuses conducted in the test laboratory. Since levocardia was observed in both treated groups, the NOAEL for embryo-/fetotoxicity and teratogenicity in rats Fatty acids, C5-9, tetraesters with pentaerythritol was found to be < 800 mg/kg bw/day and the LOAEL = 800 mg/kg bw/day.

 

Conclusion for developmental toxicity

The reliable data available for the source substances Fatty acids, C8-10. mixed esters with dipenaterythritol, isooctanoic acid, pentaerythritol and tripentaerythritol (CAS 189200-42-8) and Fatty acids, C5-9 tetraesters with pentaerythritol (CAS 67762-53-2) indicate no hazard to development in the prenatal developmental toxicity studies performed according/similar to OECD guideline 414 via the oral and dermal route in rats. Based on the available data, the target substance Fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered) and C18-unsatd., branched and linear, tri- and tetraesters with pentaerythritol (CAS 85186-72-7) is not expected to be hazardous for intrauterine development.

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 "General Requirements for Generation of Information on Intrinsic Properties of substances", information on intrinsic properties of substances may be generated by means other than tests e.g. from information from structurally related substances (grouping or read-across), provided that conditions set out in Annex XI are met. Annex XI, "General rules for adaptation of this standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X” states that “substances whose physicochemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties are likely to be similar or follow a regular pattern as a result of structural similarity may be considered as a group, or ‘category’ of substances. This avoids the need to test every substance for every endpoint". Since the analogue concept is applied to Fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered) and C18-unsatd., branched and linear, tri- and tetraesters with pentaerythritol (CAS 85186-72-7), data will be generated from data for reference source substance(s) to avoid unnecessary animal testing. Additionally, once the analogue read-across concept is applied, substances will be classified and labelled on this basis.

Based on the analogue read-across approach, the available data on toxicity to reproduction, fertility and development/teratogenicity does not meet the classification criteria according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, and is therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.