Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
May - July 1993
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
incomplete strain selection (tester strain with AT reversion site missing)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1993

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted version 1983
Deviations:
no
Remarks:
no prior stability testing of compound, compared to current guideline only 4 strains tested and incomplete strain selection (tester strain with AT reversion site missing)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-hydroxy-N-(propan-2-yl)acetamide
EC Number:
611-084-9
Cas Number:
54041-17-7
Molecular formula:
C11H14FN
IUPAC Name:
N-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-hydroxy-N-(propan-2-yl)acetamide
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Batch/Lot No.: 17001/93
Manufacturer: Bayer AG
Identity analysis: May 10, 1993
Stability: until March 29, 1995

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of male SD rats treated with aroclor 1254 (metabolic activity of each batch was verified with reference mutagen(s)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0, 8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate (tested up to the recommended maximum dose)
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
sodium azide
other: nitrofurantoin (NF), 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine (4-NPDA), 2-aminoanthracene (2-AA)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); in suspension (preincubation method)

DURATION
- Preincubation period:
20 min
- Exposure duration:
48 h

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
4 plates/strain, 2 replications

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: The first method was a gross appraisal of background growth on the plates for mutant determination. Secondly, a toxic effect of the substance was assumed when there was a marked and dose-dependent reduction in the mutant count per plate, compared to the negative controls. Thirdly, the titer was determined. Total bacterial counts were taken on two plates for each concentration studied with S9 mix. However, if an evaluation was performed only without S9 mix, the bacterial count was taken without S9 mix.
Rationale for test conditions:
The results of the first experiment were considered as a pre-test for toxicity. Since solubility was not limited, 5000 µg/plate was chosen as the highest dose. Doses of repeats were chosen on the basis of the results obtained in the first experiment.
Evaluation criteria:
A reproducible and dose-related increase in mutant counts of at least one strain is considered to be a positive result.
For TA 1535, TA 100 and TA 98 this increase should be about twice that of negative controls, whereas for TA 1537, at least a threefold increase should be reached. Otherwise, the result is evaluated as negative.

The following criteria determined the acceptance of an assay:
a) The negative controls had to be within the expected range, as defined by published data (e.g. Maron and Ames, 1983) and/or the laboratories' own historical data.
b) The positive controls had to show sufficient effects, as defined by the laboratories' experience.
c) Titer determinations had to demonstrate sufficient bacterial density in the suspension.
Only trials which complied with all three of the above criteria were accepted for assessment. Even if the criteria for points (b) and (c) were not met, a trial was accepted if it showed mutagenic activity of the test compound. Furthermore, an unacceptable trial would have been repeated.
Statistics:
Means of colony numbers were calculated.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
slight cytotoxicity at 5000 µg
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
slight cytotoxicity at 5000 µg
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
True negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 3: Results as mean values without S9 mix

























































































































































Compound



Method



concentration



TA 1535



TA 100



TA 1537



TA 98



DMSO



plate



0



11



70



9



21



Test substance



8



10



87



8



24



40



13



79



8



26



200



8



88



8



19



1000



14



70



8



23



5000



13



74



3



20



Sodium azide



 



825



-



-



-



NF



 



-



337



-



-



4-NPDA



 



-



-



64



74



DMSO



tube



0



10



97



7



23



Test substance



8



10



85



9



22



40



10



98



7



26



200



7



88



9



28



1000



9



93



7



28



5000



8



73



4



24



Sodium azide



 



564



-



-



-



NF



 



-



424



-



-



4-NPDA



 



-



-



58



70



NF: nitrofurantoin, 4-NPDA : 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine


 


 


Table 3: Table 2: Results as mean values with S9 mix

























































































































Compound



Method



concentration



TA 1535



TA 100



TA 1537



TA 98



DMSO



plate



0



14



108



7



33



Test substance



8



14



128



8



33



40



11



120



9



34



200



11



113



9



25



1000



11



124



9



23



5000



14



108



7



30



2-AA



 



59



775



56



1286



DMSO



tube



0



11



129



10



34



Test substance



8



12



80



1



37



40



13



91



09



28



200



10



64



9



28



1000



12



68



5



33



5000



8



64



4



30



2-AA



 



111



903



231



1102



2-AA: 2-aminoanthracene


 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
FOE 5043-Hydroxy was considered to be non-mutagenic without and with S9 mix in the plate incorporation as well as in the preincubation modification of the Salmonella/microsome test.
Executive summary:

FOE 5043-Hydroxy was investigated in an independent repeat using the Salmonella/microsome test for point mutagenic effects in doses up to 5000 ng per tube after preincubation for 20 minutes at 37°C on four Salmonella typhimurium LT2 mutants. These comprised the histidine-auxotrophic strains TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537 and TA 98. Doses up to and including 40 ng per tube did not cause any bacteriotoxic effects: Total bacteria counts remained unchanged and no inhibition of growth was observed. At higher doses, the substance had only a weak, strain-specific bacteriotoxic effect, so that this range could nevertheless be used for assessment purposes. Evidence of mutagenic activity of FOE 5043-Hydroxy was not seen. No biologically relevant increase in the mutant count, in comparison with the negative controls, was observed. The positive controls sodium azide, nitrofurantoin, 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine and 2-aminoanthracene had a marked mutagenic effect, as was seen by a biologically relevant increase in mutant colonies compared to the corresponding negative controls.