Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 937-688-5 | CAS number: 1391530-05-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- between 14 July 2009 and 16 July 2009.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- The assay has undergone inter-laboratory validation and has been shown to reliably detect test materials that are negligible or moderate to severe ocular irritants. The strain of rabbit used in these laboratories has been shown to produce satisfactory responses using known ocular-irritants and non-ocular irritants during in house validation. Study conducted to GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The purpose of this study was to determine the eye irritation potential of the test material using the SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model (HCE, SkinEthic Laboratories, Nice, France) after a treatment period of 10 minutes. The test is based on the hypothesis that irritant chemicals are able to penetrate the corneal epithelial tissue and are sufficiently cytotoxic to cause cell death.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- N,N'-bis[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-9-nonyl-10-octylnonadecanediamide; N-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-9-[2-(7-{[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbamoyl}heptyl)-3-[(2E)-oct-2-en-1-yl]-4-pentylcyclohexyl]nonanamide; N-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-9-[2-(7-{[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbamoyl}heptyl)-3-octyl-4-pentylcyclohexyl]nonanamide
- EC Number:
- 937-688-5
- Cas Number:
- 1391530-05-4
- Molecular formula:
- C46H82N4O2 to C46H94N4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- N,N'-bis[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-9-nonyl-10-octylnonadecanediamide; N-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-9-[2-(7-{[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbamoyl}heptyl)-3-[(2E)-oct-2-en-1-yl]-4-pentylcyclohexyl]nonanamide; N-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-9-[2-(7-{[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbamoyl}heptyl)-3-octyl-4-pentylcyclohexyl]nonanamide
- Details on test material:
- - Substance type: UVCB
- Physical state: amber coloured viscous liquid
- Analytical purity: > 97.5%
- Lot/batch No.: CM71117612
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 14 April 201 0
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Date Recieved: 14 April 2009
- Purity test date: 13 October 2008
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark
- Stability under storage conditions: Stable
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- human
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- The SkinEthic RHC model consists of transformed human keratinocytes of the cell line HCE (LSU EYE Center, New Orleans, USA) that form a corneal epithelial tissue (mucosa), devoid of stratum corneum, resembling, histologically, the mucosa of the human eye.
On arrival, the SkinEthic HCE tissues (Day 6 cultures), were stored at room temperature prior to transferring into 24-well plates designated ‘arrival plates’ containing 300 μl of maintenance medium. It was important to ensure that there were no air bubbles present under the tissue inserts. The tissues were incubated overnight at 37°C, 5% CO2 in air.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 30ul
- Concentration (if solution): Undiluted
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): N/A
- Concentration (if solution): N/A
- Lot/batch no. (if required): N/A
- Purity: N/A - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 10 min
- Observation period (in vivo):
- All the tissues were rinsed after 10 min treatment, and each tissue was placed into a pre-labelled 24-well plate containing 300 μl of maintenance medium (at room temperature for 3 h) .
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Triplicate tissues for negative control group;
Triplicate tissues for test material treated group;
Triplicate tissues for positive control group - Details on study design:
- See information presented in the below section "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables"
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Mean Tissue Viability (%)
- Run / experiment:
- 1
- Value:
- 0.626
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Mean Tissue Viability (%)
- Run / experiment:
- 2
- Value:
- 0.616
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The relative mean viability of the test material treated tissues after a 10 minute exposure was 50.9%. According to the protocol followed the test material was considered to be an irritant (I).
The test material was not able to directly reduce MTT.
Control Tissue: The positive control result of 48.9% fell within the historical range of 12.4 to 75.0% for the positive control for this study type in this testing facility.
Any other information on results incl. tables
The test material was classified according to the following criteria:
i) If the % relative mean tissue viability was 160% the test material was considered to be non-irritant.
ii) If the % relative mean tissue viability was < 60% the test material was considered to be an irritant.
Results.The relative mean viability of the test material treated tissues after a 10 minute exposure was 50.9%.
It was considered unnecessary to proceed with tissue histopathology.
Quality criteria.The quality criteria required for acceptance of results in the test were satisfied.
Conclusion.According to the protocol followed the test material was considered to be Irritant.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- According to the protocol followed the test material was considered to be Irritant.
- Executive summary:
Introduction.The purpose of this study was to determine the eye irritation potential of the test material using the SkinEthic Reconstituted Human Corneal model (HCE, SkinEthic Laboratories,,) after a treatment period of 10 minutes. The test is based on the hypothesis that irritant chemicals are able to penetrate the corneal epithelial tissue and are sufficiently cytotoxic to cause cell death.
Methods.The experimental design of the study consists of a test for direct reduction of MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphen-tetrazoum bromide) by the test material followed by the main test.
For the main test, triplicate SkinEthic tissues were treated with 30 HI of the test material for 10 minutes. Triplicate tissues treated with 30 p1 of Solution A served as the negative control and triplicate tissues treated with 30 p1 of 1% w/v Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate served as the positive control.
At the end of the exposure period each SkinEthic tissue was rinsed. The rinsed tissues (two per group) were taken for MTT loading. The remaining tissues were retained for possible histopathology. Following MTT loading the reduced MTT was extracted from the tissues.
After extraction the absorbency of triplicate aliquots of the extracted MTT solution for each SkinEthic tissue was measured. The optical density was measured at 540 nm (OD5&)). Data are presented in the form of % viability (MTT conversion relative to negative controls).
The test material was classified according to the following criteria:
i) If the % relative mean tissue viability was 160% the test material was considered to be non-irritant.
ii) If the % relative mean tissue viability was < 60% the test material was considered to be an irritant.
Results.The relative mean viability of the test material treated tissues after a 10 minute exposure was 50.9%.
It was considered unnecessary to proceed with tissue histopathology.
Quality criteria.The quality criteria required for acceptance of results in the test were satisfied.
Conclusion.According to the protocol followed the test material was considered to be Irritant.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.