Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 244-007-9 | CAS number: 20749-68-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
AMES TEST
Macrolex Rot EG suspended in DMSO, was initially investigated in the Ames test according to OECD TG 471 and GLP using the Salmonella typhimurium TA 98, TA100, TA102, TA1535, TA1537 and concentrations up to and including 5000 µg/plate (plate incorporation test) or up to and including 1600 µg/plate (preincubation methodology). Bacteriotoxicity was not reached. Precipitation was observed from 500 µg/plate onwards in both , plate incorporation test and preicubation test. None of the 5 strains used showed a dose-related and biologically relevant increase in mutant counts over those of the negative controls neither in the presence nor in the absence of the metabolic activation system S9 -mix. The positve contols were functional. Therefore, Macrolex Rot EG was considered to be non-mutagenic without and with S9 -mix in the plate incorporation as well as in the preincubation modification of the Salmonella/microsome test..
Thus this test confirmes the result of the Ames test which was performed witn only 4 Salmonella typhimurium strains.
HPRT-test
The study was performed to investigate the potential of Macrolex Rot EG to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster according to OECD TG 476.and GLP The assay was performed in two independent experiments, using two parallel cultures each. The first main experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 hours. The second experiment was performed with a treatment time of 4 hours with and 24 hours without metabolic activation. . The dose-range of the main experiments was determined in a pre-test. Precipitation of the test item at the end of treatment was noted in Experiment I, with and without S9- mix from 537.5 µg/ml onwards and in Experiment II, with and without S9 -mix from 500.0 µg/ml onwards . No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase of the mutation frequency was observed in both main experiments. Appropriate reference mutagens, used as positive controls, induced a distinct increase in mutant colonies and thus, showed the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the metabolic activation system. In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells. Therefore, Macrolex Rot EG is considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay.
MNT-in-vitro
Macrolex Rot EG was examined for mutagenic activity in the micronucleus test in vitro according to OECD TG 487 in the presense and in th absence of a metabolic activation system..No cytotoxic effects were observed. . Precipitation in the medium could be observed at 1 µg/ml and above with and without S9 -mix regardless of the treatment time. No biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of micronucleus containing V79 cells treated with the test item in the absence (4 hours or 24 hours treatment) or in the presence of S9 mix.were seen.
Evaluation of the data do not indicate that Macrolex Rot EG is a mutagen in the micronucleus test in vitro in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
No study was selected since all available in vitro studies were negative
Short description of key information:
Macrolex Rot EG proved to be not mutagenic in the Ames test, HPRT test and MNT in vitro
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data no classification or labelling is required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.