Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Vapour pressure

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
vapour pressure
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
Study period:
20 Jan 2020
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
unsuitable test system

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2020
Report date:
2021

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ASTM E-1719-97 "Vapor Pressure Measurement by Ebuiliometry"
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
dynamic method

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Reaction mass of 1,10-decanediol dimethacrylate (CAS 6701-13-9) and 10-methacryloyl-oxy-decylphosphate
Molecular formula:
C18H30O4 and C14H27O6P
IUPAC Name:
Reaction mass of 1,10-decanediol dimethacrylate (CAS 6701-13-9) and 10-methacryloyl-oxy-decylphosphate
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Lot/batch number of test material: M19-2405-001

Results and discussion

Vapour pressure
Key result
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
At 118°C and 1.0 mmHg the material was observed to be solidified.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The vapor pressure could not be measured by the dynamic method since it did not show a stable reflux at any pressure and irreversibly solidified at 118 °C.  Pressures were recorded at 80 °C and 118 °C but do not reliably show the substance vapor pressure since the vacuum controller was run continuous during the test.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The vapor pressure of MDP was not determinable (ASTM E-1719-97).
Executive summary:

The vapor pressure of MDP was examined using dynamic method. The vapor pressure was not determinable due to thermal decomposition occurring at 118°C when the material was observed to be solidified. Also, no stable reflux was observed during the experiment. Because of self-reaction at elevated temperatures, this method is unsuitable for measuring vapor pressure of this substance. Therefore, the study is considered not reliable.