Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-603-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Short term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
On the basis of the experimental studies of the structurally and functionally similar read across chemical and applying the weight of evidence approach and by evaluating the effect of test chemical on test organism, the 48 hr EC50 value can be expected to be >100 mg/l.
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
On the basis of the experimental studies of the structurally and functionally similar read across chemical and applying the weight of evidence approach and by evaluating the effect of test chemical on test organism, the 48 hr ErC50 value can be expected to be in the range 135.323 to 152.76 mg/l, respectively
Additional information
Short term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Data available of the structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the effect of the test chemical on aquatic invertebrates. The studies are as mentioned below:
An acute immobilisation test was conducted for 48 hrs for assessing the effect of test chemical. The test was performed following the principles of the OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test).The study was performed under static conditions using Daphnia magna (Water flea) as a test organism. Test organism was taken from Daphtoxkit F™ magna, a commercial kit that provides daphnids in the form of dormant eggs (ephippia) that need to be incubate 3 days before the use to obtain neonates used for the test. Neonates less than 24 h old (25 for each condition) were fed with lyophilized spirulina as dietary supplement for 2 h prior to the test and then moved to the exposure chamber. Test chemical solutions were prepared by directly dissolving the test chemical in specific test medium (ISO 6341 Standard Freshwater). Test chemical concentration used for the study was 100 mg/l. Thus, a limit test was performed using 100 mg/l test chemical concentration. Selected bottled water was used only in the daphnid assays and satisfied the acceptability criteria for holding and dilution water described by the OECD 202 guideline. ISO 6341 Standard Freshwater was used as a test medium for the study. Media were aerated for at least 1 h prior to use in order to ensure that the dissolved oxygen concentration has reached saturation. Test daphnids (25 test organisms) were exposed with the test chemical at 20±1°C for a period of 48 hrs. No illumination of light was provided to the test vessel during the study. No significant changes in pH were recorded in the test solutions. Untreated ISO formulation freshwater was used as negative control. Potassium dichromate (0.32 – 3.2 mg/L) was used as a reference substance during the study. 48 h LC50 were derived by non-linear regression analysis. All statistical analyses were done using Prism5 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). One-way ANOVA was used for statistical comparisons with Bonferroni's, Dunnett's and Tukey's post hoc tests for multiple comparisons. Significance was set at p<0.05. REGTOX macro Excel™ for dose-response was used to obtain EC50 values by a non-linear regression analysis with Hill's model. Dissolved oxygen concentration was measured with HI9142 Portable Dissolved Oxygen Meter (Hanna Instruments srl) in all test chambers at the end of the test and was higher than 3 mg/l, according to the OECD 202 guidelines. On the basis of the toxic effect of the test chemical on mobility of the test organism Daphnia magna, the 48 hr median lethal concentration (LC50) value was determined to be >100 mg/l (nominal conc.). Thus, test chemical was consideredas non-toxic to aquatic invertebrates at environmental relevant concentrations and hence, considered to be ‘not classified’ as per the CLP classification criteria.
Another short term toxicity to aquatic invertebrate study was conducted for 48 hrs for assessing the effect of test chemical. The test was performed following the principles of the OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test).The study was performed under static conditions using Daphnia magna (Water flea) as a test organism. Test was conducted using the same test procedure and test conditions as mentioned in above study. On the basis of the toxic effect of the test chemical on mobility of the test organism Daphnia magna, the 48 hr median lethal concentration (LC50) value was determined to be >100 mg/l (nominal conc.). Thus, test chemical was considered as non-toxic to aquatic invertebrates at environmental relevant concentrations and hence, considered to be ‘not classified’ as per the CLP classification criteria.
On the basis of the experimental studies of the structurally and functionally similar read across chemical and applying the weight of evidence approach and by evaluating the effect of test chemical on test organism, the 48 hr EC50 value can be expected to be >100 mg/l.
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Data available of the structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the effect of the test chemical on aquatic algae. The studies are as mentioned below:
Toxicity to aquatic algae study was carried out for 72 hrs for assessing the effect of test chemical on Raphidocelis subcapitata (green algae). Algae were routinely cultured at 25±1 °C with light in Cyanobacteria BG-11 Freshwater Solution. The culture was split twice a week, adding fresh medium. Test chemical solution was prepared directly by dissolving the formulation powder in specific test medium for algae (ISO 8692 medium). Limit test was performed using a nominal test chemical conc. of 100 mg/l. Test organism were exposed to the test chemical (2 ml) in sterile 24-well plates for 72 hrs under static conditions. Algal stock solution containing 1010000 cells/mL was added (20 μL) to each well to obtain a starting algal density of 10000 cells/mL. Untreated ISO formulation freshwater and Potassium dichromate (0.10 to 1.8 mg/l) were used as a negative and positive control. All experiments was performed in triplicates. Plates were incubated at 25±1 °C for 72 hr on an orbital shaker (90 rpm) in a thermostatic chamber. Light was provided by a 2 W LED Unit for each plate. Algal cell density was measured at the beginning and end of treatment with a TC20™ Automated Cell Counter (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc), selecting a gate of 4–14 μm or by visual scoring with a Burker's chamber. Results were expressed as effect on biomass (EbC50) and on growth rate (ErC50). All statistical analyses were done using Prism5 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). One-way ANOVA was used for statistical comparisons with Bonferroni's, Dunnett's and Tukey's post hoc tests for multiple comparisons. Significance was set at p<0.05. REGTOX macro Excel™ for dose-response was used to obtain EC50 values by a non-linear regression analysis with Hill's model. On basis of effect of the test chemical on growth rate of the test organism Raphidocelis subcapitata, the 72 hr ErC50 value was determined to be 135.323 mg/l (95% C. I. – 116.974 to 179.365 mg/l) & on the basis of biomass, the 72 hr EbC50 value was determined to be 45.365 mg/l, respectively. Thus, based on the ErC50 value (135.323mg/l) alongwith growth rate effect, test chemical was considered as non-toxic to aq. algae and hence, considered to be ‘not classified’ as per CLP classification criteria.
Another toxicity to aquatic algae study was carried out for 72 hrs for assessing the effect of test chemical on Raphidocelis subcapitata (green algae). Algae were routinely cultured at 25±1 °C with light in Cyanobacteria BG-11 Freshwater Solution. The culture was split twice a week, adding fresh medium. Test chemical solution was prepared directly by dissolving the formulation powder in specific test medium for algae (ISO 8692 medium). Limit test was performed using a nominal test chemical conc. of 100 mg/l. Test was conducted using the same test procedure and test conditions as mentioned in above study. On basis of effect of the test chemical on growth rate of the test organism Raphidocelis subcapitata, the 72 hr ErC50 value was determined to be 152.76 mg/l (95% C. I. – 134.406 to 179.274 mg/l) & on the basis of biomass, the 72 hr EbC50 value was determined to be 25.904 mg/l (95% C. I. – 22.233 to 32.632 mg/l), respectively. Thus, based on the ErC50 value (152.76 mg/l) alongwith growth rate effect, test chemical was considered as non-toxic to aq. algae and hence, considered to be ‘not classified’ as per CLP classification criteria.
On the basis of the experimental studies of the structurally and functionally similar read across chemical and applying the weight of evidence approach and by evaluating the effect of test chemical on test organism, the 48 hr ErC50 value can be expected to be in the range 135.323 to 152.76 mg/l, respectively. Thus, based on the ErC50 value alongwith growth rate effect, test chemical was considered as non-toxic to aq. algae and hence, considered to be ‘not classified’ as per CLP classification criteria.
On the basis of the available information of aquatic toxicity studies, it can be concluded that the test chemical was considered as non-toxic to aquatic organisms at environmental relevant concentrations andhence, considered to be ‘not classified’ as per the CLP classification criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.