Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
7,17,28,38-tetraazatridecacyclo[24.16.2.2²,⁵.1⁸,¹².1²⁹,³³.0³,²².0⁴,¹⁹.0⁶,¹⁷.0²³,⁴³.0²⁷,³⁸.0⁴⁰,⁴⁴.0¹⁶,⁴⁶.0³⁷,⁴⁵]octatetraconta-1(42),2(48),3,5(47),6,8,10,12(46),13,15,19,21,23,25,27,29(45),30,32,34,36,40,43-docosaene-18,39-dione; 7,17,28,38-tetraazatridecacyclo[24.16.2.2²,⁵.1⁸,¹².1²⁹,³³.0³,²².0⁴,¹⁹.0⁶,¹⁷.0²³,⁴³.0²⁸,³⁹.0⁴⁰,⁴⁴.0¹⁶,⁴⁶.0³⁷,⁴⁵]octatetraconta-1(42),2(48),3,5(47),6,8,10,12(46),13,15,19,21,23,25,29,31,33,35,37(45),38,40,43-docosaene-18,27-dione
EC number: 475-310-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- September 20, 2011 - December 15, 2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Test material form:
- solid: nanoform, no surface treatment
- Details on test material:
- - State of aggregation: solid, powder
- Particle size distribution (TEM): 30.3 nm (D50)
- Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD): not specified
- Geometric standard deviation (GSD): not specified
- Shape of particles: spherical
- Surface area of particles: 16.8 m²/g
- Crystal structure: crystalline
- Coating: no
- Surface properties: not applicable
- Density: 1515 kg/m³ at 20°C
- Moisture content: refer to IUCLID chapter 1
- Residual solvent: refer to IUCLID chapter 1
- Activation: not applicable
- Stabilisation: not applicable
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Physical state: Solid, black powder
- Analytical purity: > 99%
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 18 November 2020
- CAS No. Cis: 55034-81-6 Trans: 55034-79-2
Method
- Target gene:
- HPRT (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase)
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts, neomycin (5 Pg/mL) and amphotericin B (1 %). For the selection of mutant cells the complete medium was supplemented with 11 Pg/mL 6-thioguanine. All cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5 % CO2.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Without S9 mix: 7.0; 14.1; 28.1; 56.3; 112.5; 225.0 µg/ml
With S9 mix: 7.0; 14.1; 28.1; 56.3; 112.5; 225.0 µg/ml
In experiment I and II the cultures at the maximum concentration with and without metabolic activation were not continued to avoid evaluation of too many precipitating concentrations - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle:The solvent was chosen to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. The final concentration of acetone in the culture medium was 0.5 % (v/v).
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: with S9 mix: DMBA; 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, 1.1 Pg/mL = 4.3 µM; without S9 mix: EMS; ethylmethane sulfonate, 0.150 mg/mL = 1.2 mM
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
Approximately 1.5×10E6 (single culture) and 5×10E2 cells (in duplicate) were seeded in plastic culture flasks. After 24 hours the medium was replaced with serum-free medium containing the test item, either without S9 mix or with 50 µL/mL S9 mix. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were treated in parallel. After 4 hours this medium was replaced with complete medium following two washing steps with "saline G". In the second experiment the cells were exposed to the test item for 24 hours in complete medium, supplemented with 10 % FBS, in the absence of metabolic activation.
The colonies used to determine the cloning efficiency (survival) were fixed and stained approximately 7 days after treatment as described below. Three or four days after treatment 1.5×10E6 cells per experimental point were subcultivated in 175 cm² flasks containing 30 mL medium. Following the expression time of 7 days five 80 cm² cell culture flasks were seeded with about 3 - 5×10E5 cells each in medium containing 6-TG. Two additional 25 cm² flasks were seeded with approx. 500 cells each in non-selective medium to determine the viability. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5 % CO2 for about 8 days. The colonies were stained with 10 % methylene blue in 0.01 % KOH solution. The stained colonies with more than 50 cells were counted. In doubt the colony size was checked with a preparation microscope.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency
PRE-TEST ON TOXICITY
A pre-test was performed in order to determine the concentration range for the mutagenicity experiments. In this pre-test the colony forming ability of approximately 500 single cells (duplicate cultures per concentration level) after treatment with the test item was observed and compared to the controls. Toxicity of the test item is indicated by a reduction of the cloning efficiency (CE). Based on the solubility properties of the test item the range finding pre-experiment test was performed using a concentration range of 14.1 to 1800 µg/mL to evaluate toxicity in the presence (4 hours treatment) and absence (4 hours and 24 hours treatment) of metabolic activation. No relevant cytotoxic effect indicated by a relative suspension growth below 50 was noted up to the maximum concentration of 1800 Pg/mL with and without metabolic activation following 4 and 24 hours treatment.
The test medium was checked for precipitation or phase separation at the end of each treatment period (4 or 24 hours) prior to removal to the test item. Precipitation occurred at 112.5 µg/mL and above in the presence and absence of metabolic activation following 4 and 24 hours treatment.
Based on the occurrence of precipitation in the pre-experiment, the individual concentrations of the main experiments were selected. The individual concentrations were spaced by a factor of 2. - Evaluation criteria:
- The gene mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
- The numbers of mutant colonies per 10E6 cells found in the solvent controls fall within the laboratory historical control data.
- The positive control substances should produce a significant increase in mutant colony frequencies.
- The cloning efficiency II (absolute value) of the solvent controls should exceed 50 %.
A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response at one of the test points. A test item producing neither a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A positive response is described as follows:
A test item is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency at least at one of the concentrations in the experiment.
The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.
However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding solvent control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate within the laboratory´s historical control data range, a concentration-related increase of the mutations within this range has to be discussed. The variability of the mutation rates of solvent controls within all experiments of this study was also taken into consideration. - Statistics:
- A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05. However, both, biological and statistical significance was considered together.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: In both main experiments precipitation was observed at 56.3 Pg/mL and above in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
No relevant cytotoxic effect indicated by a relative suspension growth below 50 was noted up to the maximum concentration of 1800 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation following 4 and 24 hours treatment.
Any other information on results incl. tables
No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/106 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The mutant frequency remained well within the historical range of solvent controls. An increase of the induction factor exceeding or reaching the threshold of three times the mutation frequency of the corresponding solvent control was observed in the second culture of the first experiment with metabolic activation at the lowest concentration of 7.0 µg/mL and at 28.1 µg/mL. However, the increase was based on a rather low mutation frequency of the solvent control of just 3.4 colonies per 106 cells. Furthermore, the effect was not reproduced in the parallel culture under identical experimental conditions. Therefore, the increase of the induction factor was judged as biologically irrelevant fluctuation.
Summary of results:
concentration (µg/ml) | P | S9 Mix | relative cloning efficiency I (%) | relative cell density (%) | relative cloning efficiency II (%) | mutant colonies / 106cells | induction factor | relative cloning efficiency I (%) | relative cell density (%) | relative cloning efficiency II (%) | mutant colonies / 106cells | induction factor | |
Experiment I / 4h treatment | culture I | culture II | |||||||||||
solvent control (acetone) | - | 100 | 100 | 100 | 20.8 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 17.9 | 1 | ||
positive control (EMS) | 150 | - | 71.8 | 108.9 | 98.1 | 116 | 5.6 | 85.9 | 139.1 | 81.8 | 113.3 | 6.3 | |
test item | 7 | - | 96.9 | 109.1 | 86 | 30.1 | 1.4 | 99.3 | 120.9 | 88.6 | 6.4 | 0.4 | |
test item | 14.1 | - | 96.9 | 123.5 | 112.1 | 11.9 | 0.6 | 97.1 | 124.5 | 84 | 22.6 | 0.3 | |
test item | 28.1 | - | 89.1 | 113.2 | 88.5 | 14.8 | 0.7 | 95.1 | 154.7 | 82.9 | 15.2 | 0.8 | |
test item | 56.3 | P | - | 84.1 | 113 | 88.7 | 26.2 | 1.3 | 95.6 | 162.9 | 105.8 | 18.4 | 1 |
test item | 112.5 | P | - | 81.3 | 94 | 97.9 | 17.3 | 0.8 | 96.7 | 108.9 | 107.7 | 25.1 | 1.4 |
test item | 225 | P | - | 82.8 | culture was not continued# | culture was not continued# | |||||||
solvent control (acetone) | + | 100 | 100 | 100 | 13.4 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 3.4 | 1 | ||
positive control (DMBA) | 1.1 | + | 87.4 | 102.4 | 83 | 500.4 | 37.4 | 88.3 | 81.4 | 106.8 | 298.6 | 88.6 | |
test item | 7 | + | 101 | 147.5 | 93.1 | 12.5 | 0.9 | 103.5 | 110.9 | 110.7 | 15.5 | 4.6 | |
test item | 14.1 | + | 101.2 | 121.9 | 109 | 11.2 | 0.8 | 93.7 | 140.7 | 96.8 | 7.4 | 2.2 | |
test item | 28.1 | + | 103.1 | 115.3 | 110.7 | 13.1 | 1 | 99.8 | 105.1 | 108.8 | 10.3 | 3 | |
test item | 56.3 | P | + | 102.9 | 114.1 | 96.4 | 6.8 | 0.5 | 94.9 | 103.5 | 102.2 | 6.6 | 2 |
test item | 112.5 | P | + | 100 | 101.4 | 119.1 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 91.5 | 102.5 | 102.9 | 5.8 | 1.7 |
test item | 225 | P | + | 97.8 | culture was not continued# | 96.3 | culture was not continued# | ||||||
Experiment II / 24h treatment | |||||||||||||
solvent control (acetone) | - | 100 | 100 | 100 | 15.2 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 21.6 | 1 | ||
positive control (EMS) | 150 | - | 97.5 | 104.1 | 97.4 | 354.1 | 23.3 | 98.3 | 96.8 | 86.5 | 263.2 | 12.2 | |
test item | 7 | - | 93.2 | 102 | 91.1 | 13.1 | 0.9 | 97.1 | 112 | 79.2 | 8.6 | 0.4 | |
test item | 14.1 | - | 100.8 | 106.6 | 100.9 | 11 | 0.7 | 98.2 | 111.4 | 86.4 | 11.2 | 0.5 | |
test item | 28.1 | - | 98.9 | 106.1 | 94.8 | 23 | 1.5 | 95 | 106.1 | 92.3 | 23.5 | 1.1 | |
test item | 56.3 | P | - | 92.8 | 109.9 | 102.8 | 17.6 | 1.2 | 87.2 | 103.9 | 92.3 | 8.5 | 0.4 |
test item | 112.5 | P | - | 94.8 | 98.8 | 91.6 | 12.6 | 0.8 | 88.7 | 115.5 | 95.2 | 18.7 | 0.9 |
test item | 225 | P | - | 88 | culture was not continued# | 96.1 | culture was not continued# | ||||||
Experiment II / 4h treatment | |||||||||||||
solvent control (acetone) | + | 100 | 100 | 100 | 22.9 | 1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 20.3 | 1 | ||
positive control (DMBA) | 1.1 | + | 79.8 | 72.8 | 95.4 | 273.3 | 11.9 | 85.3 | 79.3 | 89.8 | 374.8 | 18.4 | |
test item | 7 | + | 100.7 | 107 | 104.2 | 14.6 | 0.6 | 97 | 89.9 | 99.2 | 24.3 | 1.2 | |
test item | 14.1 | + | 108.5 | 80.2 | 102.2 | 16.8 | 0.7 | 98.4 | 106.2 | 91.6 | 16.7 | 0.8 | |
test item | 28.1 | + | 112.2 | 82.3 | 91.9 | 14.6 | 0.6 | 98.7 | 84.5 | 100.2 | 18.2 | 0.9 | |
test item | 56.3 | P | + | 98.4 | 79.5 | 103.7 | 12.3 | 0.5 | 100.9 | 102.2 | 94.8 | 22.8 | 1.1 |
test item | 112.5 | P | + | 103.5 | 79.7 | 98.7 | 16.4 | 0.7 | 88.6 | 127.6 | 79 | 14.4 | 0.7 |
test item | 225 | P | + | 105.2 | culture was not continued# | 93.1 | culture was not continued# |
P = Precipitation
# culture was not continued to avoid analysis of too many precipitating concentrations
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells.
- Executive summary:
A mammalian gene mutation assay compliant with GLP and in accordance with OECD guideline 476 was performed to investigate the potential of the test article to induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster. The assay was performed in two independent experiments, using two parallel cultures each. The first main experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 hours. The second experiment was performed with a treatment time of 4 hours with and 24 hours without metabolic activation. The highest concentration (1800 µg/mL) used in the range finding pre-experiment was limited by the solubility properties of the test item in acetone and aqueous medium. The concentration range of the main experiments was limited by the occurrence of precipitation of the test item. The test item was dissolved in acetone. No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase of the mutation frequency was observed up to the maximum concentration with and without metabolic activation. Appropriate reference mutagens (EMS and DMBA), used as positive controls, induced a distinct increase in mutant colonies and thus, showed the sensitivity of the test system and the activity of the metabolic activation system. In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells. Therefore, the test substance is considered to be non-mutagenic in this HPRT assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)
Vi har mycket webbmaterial på ditt språk, men en del av den här sidan finns bara på engelska. Mer om vår flerspråkighetspolicy finns.
Välkommen till Echas webbplats. Alla funktioner på den här webbplatsen fungerar inte med Internet Explorer 7 (eller tidigare versioner). Det är därför bäst att du uppgraderar till en nyare version.
På den här webbplatsen används kakor. Syftet är att optimera din upplevelse av den.
Läs mer om hur vi använder kakor.