Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012-02-08 - 2012-05-31
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(1R)-1-[(4R,4aR,8aS)-2,6-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-hexahydro-[1,3]dioxino[5,4-d][1,3]dioxin-4-yl]ethane-1,2-diol
EC Number:
700-591-1
Cas Number:
82203-23-4
Molecular formula:
C20H20Cl2O6
IUPAC Name:
(1R)-1-[(4R,4aR,8aS)-2,6-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-hexahydro-[1,3]dioxino[5,4-d][1,3]dioxin-4-yl]ethane-1,2-diol
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): (1R)-1-[(4R,4aR,8aS)-2,6-bis(4-chlorophenyl)tetrahydro[1,3]dioxino[5,4-d][1,3]dioxin-4-yl]ethane-1,2-diol
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: December 2012
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature, protected from moisture

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 10 - 11 weeks (1st pre-test); 11 - 12 weeks (2nd pre-test); 8 - 9 weeks (main study)
- Weight at study initiation: 21.3 - 23.2 g (1st pre-test); 21.2 - 22.5 g (2nd pre-test); 17.2 - 21.2 (main study)
- Housing: group
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): pelleted standard diet, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 + 2 °C
- Humidity (%): 33 – 65 % (acclimation period); 45 – 65 % (pre-test and main study)
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethyl sulphoxide
Concentration:
0.5, 1 and 2.5 % (w/v) in the main study
No. of animals per dose:
4 (pre-test), 16 (main study)
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1
Test group / Remarks:
test concentration: 0 %
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.23
Test group / Remarks:
test concentration: 0.5 %
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.77
Test group / Remarks:
test concentration: 1%
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.07
Test group / Remarks:
test concentration: 2.5%
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: 1. 0 %: 191.4 (DPM per lymph node) 2. 0.5 %: 235.6 (DPM per lymph node) 3. 1 %: 147.6 (DPM per lymph node) 4. 2.5 %: 204.1 (DPM per lymph node)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
All treated animals survived the scheduled study period. In this study stimulation indices of 1.23, 0.77, and 1.07 were determined with the test item (1R)-1-[(4R,4aR,8aS)-2,6-bis(4-chlorophenyl)tetrahydro[1,3]dioxino[5,4-d][1,3]dioxin-4-yl]ethane-1,2-diol at concentrations of 0.5, 1, and 2.5 % (w/v) in DMSO. A clear dose response was not observed. The EC3 value could not be calculated, because none of the tested concentrations induced a S.I. greater than the threshold value of 3. The test item was not a skin sensitiser under the test conditions of this study.