Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 604-638-6 | CAS number: 148520-82-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
No experimental data on skin sensitisation potential of the target substance is available. A read-across evaluation was developed to fill data gaps with LABS Na as the source substance. The test substance is demonstrated to be not sensitizing in an in vivo maximization test and is therefore not to be classified as skin sensitiser according to CLP Regulation.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- January 14, 1985 - February 7, 1985
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- 1981; Directive 179/831 Annex, Part B
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- other: maximization test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- The study is performed prior to publication of LLNA regulation
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): LAS da Sirene X12L
- activity: 25%
- average alkyl chain length = C11.6
- Physical state: liquid - Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 6-8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 200-350 g
- Housing: Makrolon cages, 5 per cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): 8GP17 guinea pig food, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 2 degree C
- Humidity (%): 60 +/- 20%
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs light/12 hrs dark - Route:
- other: intracutaneously and epicutaneously
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- Induction concentration was 25% in water and Freund's Adjuvant; the challenge concentration was 12.5% in deionized water
- Route:
- other: no data
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- Induction concentration was 25% in water and Freund's Adjuvant; the challenge concentration was 12.5% in deionized water
- No. of animals per dose:
- 10 male and 10 female
- Details on study design:
- Induction:
Induction was first done by intradermal injection. Test animals were injected with 0.1 ml Freund Complete Adjuvant (FCA), 0.1 ml of 25% test substance in water, and 0.1 ml test substance in FCA in water (final concentration 25%). Control group was treated in a similar manner with only FCA and water. On day 7, a second, epicutaneous challenge was done. 0.5 ml of test susbtance (25%) was placed on gauze, and then placed on the animals. The animals were than bandaged, and the test substance remained in contact for 48 hrs. Control animals were exposed to vehicle only.
Challenge:
0.2 ml of 12.5 % test article was placed on gauze, which was then placed on the test and control animals. Gauze containing only vehicle was placed on the left flank. The exposure lasted 24 hrs. Observations for irritation were made at 24 and 48 hrs after the end of exposure. Skin was scored for irritation using the Draize scale. - Positive control substance(s):
- not specified
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0.2 ml of 12.5% test solution
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- no positive responses were observed
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 0.2 ml 12.5% test solution
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0.2 ml 12.5% test solution
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0.2 ml 12.5% test solution
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Group:
- positive control
- Remarks on result:
- other: not specified
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Group:
- positive control
- Remarks on result:
- other: not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Conclusions:
- The test substance is not sensitizing to skin and is therefore not to be classified according to CLP regulation.
- Executive summary:
This test determined the potential of the test substance to be sensitizing to skin. 10 male and 10 female guinea pigs were given intradermal injections of 25% test solution. Control animals (5 male and 5 female) were given injections of vehicle only. One week later, a second induction was done by dermal exposure to 25% test solution for 24 hrs. Control animals were again exposed to vehicle only. On day 21, the challenge exposure was performed. All animals were exposed to 12.5% test solution dermally. Exposure was for 24 hrs, with observations made at 48 and 72 hrs after the start of exposure. No positive reactions were noted. The test substance is not sensitizing.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vitro
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
No experimental data on skin sensitisation potential of the target substance is available. A read-across evaluation was developed to fill data gaps with LABS Na as the source substance. This test determined the potential of the test substance to be sensitizing to skin. 10 male and 10 female guinea pigs were given intradermal injections of 25% test solution. Control animals (5 male and 5 female) were given injections of vehicle only. One week later, a second induction was done by dermal exposure to 25% test solution for 24 hrs. Control animals were again exposed to vehicle only. On day 21, the challenge exposure was performed. All animals were exposed to 12.5% test solution dermally. Exposure was for 24 hrs, with observations made at 48 and 72 hrs after the start of exposure. No positive reactions were noted. The test substance is not sensitizing.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test substance is not to be classified according to CLP Regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.