Registration Dossier

Physical & Chemical properties

Density

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
relative density
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
June 27, 2017 - November 02, 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 109 (Density of Liquids and Solids)
Qualifier:
according to
Guideline:
EU Method A.3 (Relative Density)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. certificate)
Type of method:
air comparison pycnometer (for solids)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Analytical purity: 100% (UVCB)
- Purity test date: 06 June 2017
- Lot/batch No.: 180517GT41
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 31 December 2017
- Appearance: Beige pasty solid
- Storage: At room temperature
Key result
Type:
relative density
Density:
1.11
Temp.:
20 °C
Type:
density
Density:
1.11 g/cm³
Temp.:
20 °C

The individual measurements were obtained with an accuracy of < 0.02 g/cm3. According to the guideline, the density of the test item is given as the mean value.

Conclusions:
The density of the test item at 20ºC was 1.11 g/cm3. The relative density was 1.11.
Executive summary:

The relative density of the test item was determined in a GLP-compliant study performed in accordance with EU Method A.3 and OECD Guideline No. 109, using the pycnometer method. The mean relative density of the test item was 1.11 at 20°C.

Description of key information

The relative density of the test item was determined in a GLP-compliant study performed in accordance with EU Method A.3 and OECD Guideline No. 109, using the pycnometer method. The mean relative density of the test item was 1.11 at 20°C.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Relative density at 20C:
1.11

Additional information

The relative density of the test item was determined in one GLP-compliant study performed in accordance with standard methods, without deviations. The study is considered as reliable (Klimisch 1) and was selected as a key study for the endpoint.