Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1998
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1998
Report date:
1998

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
This study was performed in 1998.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Glycine, N-coco acyl derivs., sodium salts
EC Number:
291-350-5
EC Name:
Glycine, N-coco acyl derivs., sodium salts
Cas Number:
90387-74-9
Molecular formula:
Molecular formula for this UVCB is not available.
IUPAC Name:
Glycine, N-coco acyl derivs., sodium salts
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Name: Sodium cocoyl glycinate (GCS-12)
Lot No.: 970925
Description: Clear liquid
Composition: 31.5% solution
Storage: Cool, dark place

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
50 female Hartley guinea pigs were purchased from Charles River Japan, Inc. After the one-week quarantine and acclimatization period, 45 guinea pigs that showed no abnormality were selected and assigned to the vehicle control group, the test article group or the positive control group.

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
5%
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
5%
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Challenge
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
5%
Adequacy of challenge:
not specified
No. of animals per dose:
5-10
Details on study design:
Induction:
Intradermal: 5% (concentration for induction was based on the concentration in final products)
Epidermal: 5%

Challenge:
Because no primary dermal irritation was observed with respect to the test item in a preliminary study, a 5% (w/w) solution of the test item was used in the challenge.
Challenge controls:
vehicle controls
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.1%
No. with + reactions:
10
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
No indications for a skin sensitizing potential in guinea pigs
Executive summary:

A skin sensitization study was conducted in guinea pigs using the maximization method. Distilled water for injection was used as a vehicle control, and 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene was used as a positive control. No change was observed on the skin of the animals in the test item group following challenge, while skin reactions were observed in all animals of the positive control group.

Categories Display