Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The LD50 (oral, gavage, rats) was determined >2000 mg/kg bw

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
December 1978
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Version / remarks:
Hazleton Manual of Standard Operating Procedures as applied to ICI Ltd., Central Toxicology Lahoratory procedure number CT20-90, Rat acute oral toxicity test; (HLE protocol no. 548/1).
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
Pre-dates GLP
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Animals
Thirteen male and 13 female rats of the Wistar strain, obtained from Bantin and Kingman Ltd., Grimston, Aldbrough, Nr. Hull, were used for this study. They were conditioned to the laboratory environment for not less than 6 days. On the day before dosing individual body weights were as follows: males 140 - 200 g, females 111 - 160 g. Two female animals (No. 1 - 114 g, No. 5 - 111 g) were martinally outside the body weight range stated in the protocol (115 - 160 g), but were dosed as it was thought such marginal changes would not affect the study.

Diet
With the exception of the overnight fast (for 18-20 hours before treatment) the animals were allowed free access to mains water and food (Rat and Mouse No. 1 Expanded Diet, BP Nutrition (U.K.) Ltd., Witham, Essex). The food was reintroduced immediately after dosing.

Environment
All animals were housed in a single air-conditioned room maintained at a temperature of 22 + 3°C, relative humidity 50 + 10% and exposed to natural lighting conditions. They were caged in groups of five, by sex or two by sex as appropriate in grid floor polypropylene boxes.
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on oral exposure:
A single oral dose of test article, based on the fasted body weight of the animals at the time of treatment, was administered by gavage using a metal stomach tube (14g x 8cm).
The animals were then returned to their cages for observation.
Doses:
250, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000 mg/kg bw (preliminary test)
5000 mg/kg bw (main test)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Four groups each of 4 fasted rats (2 males, 2 females) and one group of 10 fasted rats (5 males, 5 females) were dosed according to the schedule.
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
Dose range, finding study - phase 1
Four groups each of 4 fasted rats (2 males, 2 females) and one group of 10 fasted rats (5 males, 5 females) were dosed according to the schedule. Animals were observed for mortality over the following 48 hours.

Dose range finding study -phase 2
Mortality at a level of 50% or greater in any group did not occur during phase 1 and the surviving animals in groups 1-4 were killed. The group 5 animals were retained for observation for a further 12 days.

Observations on the group 5 animals (main test)
Animals were observed for overt toxicity and mortality at ¼, 1, 2 and 4 hours after treatment and subsequently once daily for 14 days and the observations were recorded. Body weights of survivors were recorded 2, 3, 8 and 14 days after treatment. Animals dying during the working day, animals killed in extremis and animals showing signs of toxicity at the end of the observation period were subjected to necropsy to determine any macroscopic signs of abnormalities.
At the end of the observation period all surviving animals were killed.
Preliminary study:
Mortality at a level of 50% or greater in any group did not occur during dose range finding phase 1.
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 5 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: main test (single dose 5000 mg/kg bw)
Mortality:
Two female animals died within 48 hours of treatment, and 1 male died within 72 hours of treatment.
Clinical signs:
other: Group 5 animals All male animals showed signs of lethargy within 48 hours of treatment. One male died; the remaining 4 animals appeared normal within 72 hours of treatment and throughout the remaining observation period. All female survivors appeared norm
Gross pathology:
Necropsy was not performed on any of the animals on test.
Other findings:
No further findings specified in the study report.

Mortality in the dose range finding study up to 48 hours

Dose

(mg/kg)

Mortality

Cumulative mortality

(%)

Male

Female

Total

250

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

500

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

1000

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

2000

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

5000

0/5

2/5

2/10

20

 

Mortality and signs of reaction in group 5 rats given a single-oral dose

Dosage

(mg/kg)

Observation

Animal number and sex

Number showing effect during

Male

Female

Hour

Day

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

1

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8-14

5000

Body weights (g)

Day 1 (Pre-fast)

Day 1 (post-fast)

Day 2

Day 3

Day 8

Day 14

Increment

 

155

150

149

174

195

220

65

 

157

141

118

155

197

238

81

 

167

149

142

176

208

253

88

 

154

135

104

-

-

-

-

 

164

144

138

173

205

239

75

 

114

101

-

-

-

-

-

 

123

107

120

126

137

157

34

 

125

112

118

129

143

170

45

 

122

111

126

131

148

168

46

 

111

102

-

-

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortality

 

 

 

*

 

*

 

 

 

*

0/10

0/10

1/10

2/10

3/10

3/10

3/10

3/10

3/10

3/10

Time when deaths noted (hr)

 

 

 

72

 

48

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signs of reaction

Lethargy

 

+

 

+

 

+

 

+

 

+

 

 

 

 

 

 

0/10

 

0/10

 

1/9

 

5/8

 

0/7

 

0/7

 

0/7

 

0/7

 

0/7

 

0/7

Necropsy NP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NP = Not performed

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The oral LD50 (rats, gavage) was greater than 5000 mg/kg bw in a limit test. The substance is not classifiable according to CLP criteria.
Executive summary:

This study was undertaken to determine the oral median lethal dose (LD50) of Disperse Brown 19 in rats. It was performed in accordance with Standard Operating Procedures.

 

Four groups each of 4 fasted rats (2 males, 2 females) and one group of 10 fasted rats (5 males, 5 females; main study) were dosed according to the schedule. Animals were observed for mortality over the following 48 hours.

Treatment schedule

Study

Dose group

Dose level

(mg/kg)

Solution concentrations

(mg/ml)

Treatment volume

(ml/kg)

Dose range finding

1

2

3

4

5

250

500

1000

2000

5000

500

500

500

500

500

0.5

1.0

2.0

4.0

10.0

Mortality at a level of 50% or greater in any group did not occur during phase 1 and the surviving animals in groups 1-4 were killed. The group 5 animals were retained for observation for a further 12 days.

 

Results

Two female animals died within 48 hours of treatment, and 1 male died within 72 hours of treatment.

Mortality

Dose

(mg/kg)

Mortality

Cumulative mortality

(%)

Male

Female

Total

250

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

500

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

1000

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

2000

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

5000

1/5

2/5

3/10

30

 

Group 5 Animals-All male animals showed signs of lethargy within 48 hours of treatment. One male died; the remaining 4 animals appeared normal within 72 hours of treatment and throughout the remaining observation period. All female survivors appeared normal throughout the observation period.

All surviving male animals showed decreases in body weight at day 3 of observation but these animals and all female survivors showed normal body weight gains at the end of the observation period.

Necropsy was not performed on any of the animals on test.

 

Conclusion

Following a dose range finding study in rats of the Wistar strain it was concluded that test article was relatively non-toxic and the oral LD50 was greater than 5000 mg/kg. This results was confirmed by the main study (5000 mg/kg bw).

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1981
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
Principles of method if other than guideline:
BASF-Test
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
no data
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 2% to 30%
Doses:
up to 16900 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
no data
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 7 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: no data
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
Statistics:
NA
Preliminary study:
NA
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 16 900 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks:
content: 20.5%
Remarks on result:
other: equals to > 3464.5 mg/kg be 100% api
Mortality:
no effects
Clinical signs:
other: no effects
Gross pathology:
no effects
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
acute oral LD50 in rats is higher than 16900 mg/kg bw, no labelling necessary
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

A study was undertaken to determine the oral median lethal dose (LD50) of Disperse Brown 19 in rats. It was performed in accordance with Standard Operating Procedures.

 

Four groups each of 4 fasted rats (2 males, 2 females)and one group of 10 fasted rats (5 males, 5 females; main study) were dosed according to the schedule. Animals were observed for mortality over the following 48 hours.

Treatment schedule

Study

Dose group

Dose level

(mg/kg)

Solution concentrations

(mg/ml)

Treatment volume

(ml/kg)

Dose range finding

1

2

3

4

5

250

500

1000

2000

5000

500

500

500

500

500

0.5

1.0

2.0

4.0

10.0

Mortality at a level of 50% or greater in any group did not occur during phase 1 and the surviving animals in groups 1-4 were killed. The group 5 animals were retained for observation for a further 12 days.

 

Results

Two female animals died within 48 hours of treatment, and 1 male died within 72 hours of treatment.

Mortality

Dose

(mg/kg)

Mortality

Cumulative mortality

(%)

Male

Female

Total

250

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

500

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

1000

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

2000

0/2

0/2

0/4

0

5000

1/5

2/5

3/10

30

 

Group 5 Animals-All male animals showed signs of lethargy within 48 hours of treatment. One male died; the remaining 4 animals appeared normal within 72 hours of treatment and throughout the remaining observation period. All female survivors appeared normal throughout the observation period.

All surviving male animals showed decreases in body weight at day 3 of observation but these animals and all female survivors showed normal body weight gains at the end of the observation period.

Necropsy was not performed on any of the animals on test.

 

Conclusion

Following a dose range finding study in rats of the Wistar strain it was concluded that test article was relatively non-toxic and the oral LD50 was greater than 5000 mg/kg. This result was confirmed by the main study (5000 mg/kg bw).

In another study a liquid preparation of Disperse Brown 19 was tested up to 16900 mg/kg bw. The LD50 in this study was determined to be above 16900 mg/kg bw of this preparation, which equals to 3665 mg/kg bw of pure substance.

Justification for classification or non-classification