Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-433-0 | CAS number: 10163-15-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was performed between 08 December 2009 and 22 December 2009
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of GLP inspection: 15 September 2006 Date of Signature on GLP certificate: 26 November 2009
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Disodium fluorophosphate
- EC Number:
- 233-433-0
- EC Name:
- Disodium fluorophosphate
- Cas Number:
- 10163-15-2
- Molecular formula:
- FH2O3P.2Na
- IUPAC Name:
- disodium fluorophosphate
- Details on test material:
- Sponsor's identification: Disodium fluorophosphate
Description : white solid
Purity : 95%+
Batch number : 9-01941-56
Date received : 12 August 2009
Storage conditions: room temperature in the dark over silica gel
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CBA/Ca (CBA/CaOlaHsd)
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:
Female CBA/Ca (CBA/CaOlaHsd) strain mice were supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Limited, Bicester, Oxon, UK.
- Age at study initiation:
At the start of the study the animals were eight to twelve weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation:
At the start of the study the animals were in the weight range of 15 to 23g.
- Housing:
The animals were individually housed in suspended solid-floor polypropylene cages furnished with softwood woodflakes.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):
ad libitum (2014 Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Teklad, Blackthorn, Bicester, Oxon, UK)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):
ad libitum.
- Acclimation period:
At least five days.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):
The temperature was controlled to remain within the target ranges of 19 to 25 deg C.
- Humidity (%):
The humidity was controlled to remain within the target ranges of 30 to 70%.
- Air changes (per hr):
The rate of air exchange was approximately fifteen changes per hour.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):
The lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
IN-LIFE DATES:
From: Day 1 To: Day 6
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Remarks:
- Please see below for Vehicle Determination Record
- Concentration:
- Each group was exposed to concentrations of 25%, 10% or 5% w/w in propylene glycol.
- No. of animals per dose:
- Groups of four mice were treated.
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Using available information regarding the systemic toxicity/irritancy potential of the test material, a preliminary screening test was performed using one mouse. The mouse was treated by daily application of 25 µl of the test material at a concentration of 25% w/w in propylene glycol, to the dorsal surface of each ear for three consecutive days (Days 1, 2, 3). The mouse was observed twice daily on Days 1, 2 and 3 and once daily on Days 4, 5 and 6. Any signs of toxicity or excessive local irritation noted during this period were recorded. The bodyweight was recorded on Day 1 (prior to dosing) and on Day 6.
- Lymph node proliferation response:
Clinical observations, bodyweight and mortality data are given in Table 1.
No signs of systemic toxicity were noted.
Based on this information the dose levels selected for the main test were 25%, 10% and 5% w/w in propylene glycol.
MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method:
Local Lymph Node Assay in the Mouse. The assay has undergone extensive inter-laboratory validation and has been shown to reliably detect test materials that are moderate to strong sensitisers.
- Criteria used to consider a positive response:
The proliferation response of lymph node cells was expressed as the number of radioactive disintegrations per minute per lymph node(dpm/node) and as the ratio of 3HTdR incorporation in lymph node cells of test nodes relative to that recorded for the control nodes (stimulation Index).
The test material will be regarded as a sensitiser if at least one concentration of the test material results in a threefold or greater increase in 3HTdR incorporation compared to control values. Any test material failing to produce a threefold or greater increase in 3HTdR incorporation will be classified as a "non-sensitier".
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
For the purpose of the study, the test material was used at concentrations of 25%, 10% or 5% w/w in propylene glycol. This vehicle was chosen as it produced the most suitable formulation at the required concentration. The concentrations used are given above. The vehicle determination record is included as Appendix 3.
Determination, by analysis, of the concentration, homogeneity and stability of the test material preparations was not appropriate because it was not specified in the Study Plan and is not a requirement of the Test Guidelines.
Groups of four mice were treated with the test material at concentrations of 25%, 10% or 5% w/w in propylene glycol. The preliminary screening test suggested that the test material would not produce systemic toxicity or excessive local irritation at the highest suitable concentration. The mice were treated by daily application of 25 µl of the appropriate concentration of the test material to the dorsal surface of each ear for three consecutive days (Days 1, 2 and 3). The test material formulation was administered using an automatic micropipette and spread over the dorsal surface of the ear using the tip of the pipette.
A further group of four mice received the vehicle alone in the same manner.
3H-Methyl Thymidine Administration:
Five days following the first topical application of the test material (Day 6) all mice were injected via the tail vein with 250 µl of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 3H-methyl thymidine (3HTdR: 80 µCi/ml, specific activity 2.0 Ci/mmol, GE Healthcare UK Ltd) giving a total of 20 µCi to each mouse. - Positive control substance(s):
- other: Phenylacetaldehyde (90%) as a solution in propylene glycol at a concentration of 2.5% v/v
- Statistics:
- None provided.
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- A group of five animals was treated with 50 µl (25 µl per ear) of Phenylacetaldehyde (90%) as a solution in propylene glycol at a concentration of 2.5% v/v. A further control group of five animals was treated with propylene glycol alone.
The Stimulation Index expressed as the mean radioactive incorporation for the treatment group divided by the mean radioactive incorporation of the vehicle control group is as follows:
Concentration (% v/v) in
propylene glycol Stimulation Index Result
2.5 4.20 Positive
Conclusion. Phenylacetaldehyde (90%) was considered to be a sensitiser under the conditions of the test.
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 0.99
- Test group / Remarks:
- 5% w/w (in propylene glycol)
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.59
- Test group / Remarks:
- 10% w/w (in propylene glycol)
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 2.88
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25% w/w (in propylene glycol)
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 - Clinical Observations, Bodyweight and Mortality Data – Preliminary Screening Test
Concentration (%w/w) in |
Animal Number |
Bodyweight (g) |
Day |
|||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|||||||
Day 1 |
Day 6 |
Pre-Dose |
Post Dose |
Pre-Dose |
Post Dose |
Pre-Dose |
Post Dose |
|||||
25 |
S-1 |
19 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0= No signs of systemic toxicity
Table 2 - Disintegrations per Minute, Disintegrations per Minute/Node and Stimulation Index
Concentration |
dpm |
dpm/Nodea |
Stimulation Indexb |
Result |
Vehicle |
6458.22 |
807.28 |
na |
na |
5 |
6388.33 |
798.54 |
0.99 |
Negative |
10 |
10266.43 |
1283.30 |
1.59 |
Negative |
25 |
18595.53 |
2324.44 |
2.88 |
Negative |
dpm= Disintegrations per minut
a= Disintegrations per minute/node obtained by dividing the disintegrations per minute value by 8 (total number of lymph nodes)
b= Stimulation Index of 3.0 or greater indicates a positive result
na = Not applicable
Table 3 - Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data
Concentration |
Animal Number |
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
Day 4 |
Day 5 |
Day 6 |
|||
Pre-Dose |
Post Dose |
Pre-Dose |
Post Dose |
Pre-Dose |
Post Dose |
|||||
Vehicle |
1-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1-2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
2-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2-2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
3-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3-2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3-3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3-4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
25 |
4-1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4-2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4-3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
4-4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0= No signs of systemic toxicity
Table 4 - Individual Bodyweights and Bodyweight Changes
Concentration |
Animal Number |
Bodyweight (g) |
Bodyweight Change (g) |
|
Day 1 |
Day 6 |
|||
Vehicle |
1-1 |
17 |
19 |
2 |
1-2 |
19 |
20 |
1 |
|
1-3 |
20 |
19 |
-1 |
|
1-4 |
18 |
19 |
1 |
|
5 |
2-1 |
20 |
19 |
-1 |
2-2 |
19 |
19 |
0 |
|
2-3 |
20 |
19 |
-1 |
|
2-4 |
20 |
20 |
0 |
|
10 |
3-1 |
20 |
21 |
1 |
3-2 |
21 |
21 |
0 |
|
3-3 |
17 |
18 |
1 |
|
3-4 |
20 |
20 |
0 |
|
25 |
4-1 |
18 |
17 |
-1 |
4-2 |
20 |
20 |
0 |
|
4-3 |
19 |
19 |
0 |
|
4-4 |
19 |
18 |
-1 |
Current Positive Control Study for the Local Lymph Node Assay
Introduction. A study was performed to assess the sensitivity of the strain of mouse used at these laboratories to a known sensitiser. The methodology for the LLNA is detailed in the OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 429, and Method B.42 of CommissionRegulation (EC) No. 440/2008. The study described in this document is based on these test methods but has been refined in order to reduce the number of animals required. The reduced LLNA (rLLNA) has been endorsed by the non‑Commission members of the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Method (ECVAM) Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC) at its 26thmeeting held on 26 – 27 April 2007 at ECVAM,Ispra,Italy.
Test Material: Phenylacetaldehyde (90%)
Project number: 0039/1115
Study dates: 05 November 2009 to 11 November 2009
Methods. A group of five animals was treated with 50 µl (25 µl per ear) of Phenylacetaldehyde (90%) as a solution in propylene glycol at a concentration of 2.5% v/v. A further control group of five animals was treated with propylene glycol alone.
Results. The Stimulation Index expressed as the mean radioactive incorporation for the treatment group divided by the mean radioactive incorporation of the vehicle control group is as follows:
Concentration (% v/v) in |
Stimulation Index |
Result |
2.5 |
4.20 |
Positive |
Conclusion. Phenylacetaldehyde (90%) was considered to be a sensitiser under the conditions of the test.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- The test material was considered to be a non-sensitiser under the conditions of the test.
This study is conducted according to an appropriate guideline and under the conditions of GLP, the study is therefore considered to be acceptable and to adequately satisfy both the guideline requirement and the regulatory requirement as a key study for this endpoint. - Executive summary:
Introduction. A study was performed to assess the skin sensitisation potential of the test material in the CBA/Ca strain mouse following topical application to the dorsal surface of the ear. The method was designed to meet the requirements of the following:
OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals No. 429 "Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay" (adopted24 April 2002)
Method B42 Skin Sensitisation (Local Lymph Node Assay) of CommissionRegulation (EC) No. 440/2008
Methods. Following a preliminary screening test in which no clinical signs of toxicity were noted at a concentration of25% w/w, this concentration was selected as the highest dose investigated in the main test of the Local Lymph Node Assay. Three groups, each of four animals, were treated with 50 µl (25 µl per ear) of the test material as asuspensioninpropylene glycolat concentrations of25%,10% or5% w/w. A further group of four animals was treated withpropylene glycolalone.
Results. The Stimulation Index expressed as the mean radioactive incorporation for each treatment group divided by the mean radioactive incorporation of the vehicle control group are as follows:
Concentration (%w/w) in
propylene glycolStimulation Index
Result
5
0.99
Negative
10
1.59
Negative
25
2.88
Negative
Conclusion. The test material was considered to be anon-sensitiserunder the conditions of the test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)