Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Additional toxicological data

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
additional toxicological information
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
no data
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Selective degeneration in the rat olfactory bulb following exposure to different odours
Author:
Pinching AJ and Doeving KB
Year:
1974
Bibliographic source:
Brain Res. 82, 195-204

Materials and methods

Type of study / information:
Effect on olfactory bulb
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Degeneration in rat olfactory bulb following exposure to cyclododecanone
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Cyclododecanone
EC Number:
212-595-6
EC Name:
Cyclododecanone
Cas Number:
830-13-7
Molecular formula:
C12H22O
IUPAC Name:
Cyclododecanone
Details on test material:
no data

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

Principal effects were darkening and shrinkage of the cell bodies (both  cytoplasm and nucleus).
For cyclododecanone a more extensive degeneration in the posterior than  in the anterior region was found.
For each of the 44 different odors investigated in this study, a specific  pattern of mitral cell degeneration was observed in the 

olfactory bulb;  the pattern and extent of this 'selective degeneration' did not appear to  be correlated with the concentration of the 

odorant. The results suggest  a topological representation of different odors in the olfactory bulb.

Applicant's summary and conclusion