Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
The study was conducted between 27 May 2014 and 17 June 2014.
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study is considered to be a reliability 1 as it has been conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 423 using the Acute Toxic Class Method and in compliance with GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-methylpentan-3-yl (2E)-but-2-enoate
EC Number:
806-544-2
Cas Number:
1370711-06-0
Molecular formula:
C10H18O2
IUPAC Name:
2-methylpentan-3-yl (2E)-but-2-enoate
Test material form:
other: Liquid
Details on test material:
Identification: IFF TM 12-209
Physical state / appearance: Extremely pale yellow liquid
Storage conditions: Approximately 4 °C in the dark

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Female Wister (RccHanTM: WIST) strain rats were supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK. On receipt, the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The females were nulliparous and non-pregnant. After an acclimatization period of at least five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink-marking on the tail and a number written n a cage card. At the start of the study the animals were eight to twelve weeks of age. The body weight variation did not exceed ± 20 % of the mean body weight of the initially dosed group.
The animals were housed in groups of three in suspended solid-floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. With the exception of an overnight fast immediately before dosing and for approximately three to four hours after dosing, free access to mains drinking water and food (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analysed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that would reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25 °C and 30 to 70 % respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give 12 hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
DMSO
Details on oral exposure:
For the purpose of the 2000 mg/kg dose level, the test item was supplied. The specific gravity was determined and used to calculate the appropriate dose volume for the required dose level. For the purpose of the 300 mg/kg dose level, the test item was freshly prepared, as required, as a solution in dimethyl sulphpoxide. Dimethyl sulphpoxide was used because the test item did not dissolve / suspend in distilled water or arachis oil BP.
The test item was formulated within 2 hours of being applied to the test system. It is assumed that the formulation was stable for this duration.
No analysis was conducted to determine the homogeneity, concentration or stability of the test item formulation. This is an exception with regard to GLP and has been reflected in the GLP compliance statement.
Doses:
300 and 2000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3 females / dose
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
In the absence of data regarding the toxicity of the test item, 300 mg/kg was chosen as the starting dose.
All animals were dosed once only by gavage, using a metal cannula attached to a graduated syringe. The volume administered to each animal was calculated according to the fasted body weight at the time of dosing. Treatment of animals was sequential. Sufficient time was allowed between each group to confirm the survival of the previously dosed animals.
The animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for fourteen days. Due to a technician error, the Day 10 clinical observations for the animals treated at a dose level of 300 mg/kg body weight were not performed. This deviation was considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the study as no signs of systemic toxicity were observed pre- or post Day 10.
Individual body weights were recorded prior to dosing and seven and fourteen days after treatment.
At the end of the observation period, the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross pathological examination. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities for examination of major organs. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained.

Evaluation of Data
Data evaluations included the relationship, if any, between the exposure of the animal to the test item and the incidence and severity of all abnormalities including behavioural and clinical observations, gross lesions, body weight changes, mortality and any other toxicological effects.
Using the mortality data obtained, an estimate of the acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item was made.
The results were also evaluated according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
There were no deaths
Clinical signs:
other: Hunched posture and ataxia were noted during the day of dosing in the second group of animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg. There were no signs of systemic toxicity noted in animals treated at a dose level of 300 mg/kg and the initial group trea
Gross pathology:
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Mortality Data

Dose Level mg/kg

Sex

Number of Animals Treated

Deaths During Day of Dosing
(Hours)

Deaths During Period After Dosing
(Days)

Deaths

½

1

2

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8-14

300

Female

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/3

2000

Female

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/3

Female

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0/3

 

Individual Clinical Observations - 300 mg/kg

Dose Level mg/kg

Animal Number and Sex

Effects Noted After Dosing
(Hours)

Effects Noted During Period After Dosing
(Days)

½

1

2

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

300

1-0

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

*

0

0

0

0

1-1

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

*

0

0

0

0

1-2

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

*

0

0

0

0

0=   No signs of systemic toxicity

*=  Observation not performed due to technician error

Individual Clinical Observations - 2000 mg/kg

Dose Level mg/kg

Animal Number and Sex

Effects Noted After Dosing
(Hours)

Effects Noted During Period After Dosing
(Days)

½

1

2

4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

2000

2-0

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-1

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2-2

Female

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3-0

Female

H

H

H

HA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3-1

Female

0

H

H

HA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3-2

Female

0

H

H

HA

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0= No signs of systemic toxicity                    

H = Hunched posture                        

A = Ataxia

Individual Body Weights and Body Weight Changes - 300 mg/kg

Dose Level

mg/kg

Animal Number
and Sex

Body Weight (g) at Day

Body Weight Gain (g) During Week

0

7

14

1

2

300

1-0 Female

173

184

188

11

4

1-1 Female

185

196

200

11

4

1-2 Female

171

178

187

7

9

Individual Body Weights and Body Weight Changes - 2000 mg/kg

Dose Level

mg/kg

Animal Number
and Sex

Body Weight (g) at Day

Body Weight Gain (g) During Week

0

7

14

1

2

2000

2-0 Female

174

184

204

10

20

2-1 Female

169

176

185

7

9

2-2 Female

180

187

196

7

9

3-0 Female

172

203

212

31

9

3-1 Female

169

183

196

14

13

3-2 Female

164

180

190

16

10

 

Individual Necropsy Findings - 300 mg/kg

Dose Level
mg/kg

Animal Number
and Sex

Time of Death

Macroscopic Observations

300

1-0 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

1-1 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

1-2 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

 Individual Necropsy Findings - 2000 mg/kg

Dose Level
mg/kg

Animal Number
and Sex

Time of Death

Macroscopic Observations

2000

2-0 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

2-1 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

2-2 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

3-0 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

3-1 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected

3-2 Female

Killed Day 14

No abnormalities detected


Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight (Globally Harmonized Classification System – Category 5 > 2000 – 5000 mg/kg body weight).
The test item does not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272 / 2008, relating to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.
Executive summary:

The acute oral toxicity of the test substance, TM 12-209, was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight according to OECD Test Guideline 423 using the Acute Toxic Class Method.