Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 248-792-9 | CAS number: 28043-10-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation: non-irritating, eq. or sim. to OECD TG 404, 1981
Eye irritation: non-irritating, eq. or sim. to OECD TG 405, 1981
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1981
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study following a method equivalent to a recognised OECD guideline. Deviations to recognised guideline are noted.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Occlusive dressing smaller exposure area (ca. 2.5cm2), longer exposure period (24h) shorter observation period (48h)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: 16 CFR 1500.41
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The method was in accordance with the 16 CFR 1500.41 and US CPSC requirements
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: albino; not otherwise specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Recognised animal supplier
- Age at study initiation: Not reported.
- Weight at study initiation: Not reported.
- Housing: Not reported but in compliance with Animal Welfare Act (Pub. L-94-279) 9 CFR Part 3 (USA).
- Diet: rabbit chow ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Not reported.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Not reported.
- Humidity (%): Not reported.
- Air changes (per hr): Not reported.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Not reported. - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped / abraded
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 ml
- Concentration (if solution): neat (liquid) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 72 hours
- Number of animals:
- 6 (sexes not specified)
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: According to 16 CFR 1500.41
- % coverage: Not reported. A group of six albino rabbits was clipped over a wide area. One side of the animals' backs was abraded at one site with a lancet sufficiently deep to penetrate the stratum corneum but not enter the derma to produce bleeding. The skin of the other side was allowed to remain intact.
- Type of wrap if used: Occlusive (gauze wrapped with impervious material)
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Not reported
- Time after start of exposure: Not applicable.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize-scoring system. References: 16 CFR 1500.41 and 16 CFR 1500.3. - Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: mean of 24 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 8
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact and abraded skin
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Intact skin: No edema and no erythema responses were observed in any animal at any observation point.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: US CPSC / US FDA
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study the test substance is not considered to be irritating to the skin.
- Executive summary:
The GLP study was completed under 16 CFR 1500.41 following a guideline similar to OECD 404, to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the skin of the albino rabbit. The test substance was evaluated in 6 albino rabbits. A dose of 0.5 ml test substance was applied to intact and abraded clipped dorsal skin site under a occlusive dressing for 24 hours. Skin observations were made 24 and 72 hours after patch removal. No edema or erythema responses were noted (Score = 0) at 24 or 72 hours in the intact and/or the abraded skin in all organisms. The test material produced a mean primary irritation index (PII) of 0.00 and is considered to be non-irritating to skin.
Reference
Table 1. Skin reactions (using Draize scoring method)
Erythema & Eschar Formation | Hours | Rabbit number | Mean score | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||
Intact skin | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
Abraded skin | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
Edema | ||||||||
Intact skin | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
Abraded skin | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
Sum of mean scores | 0.00 | |||||||
Primary irritation index = sum of mean scores/4 | 0.00 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1981
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study following a method equivalent to a recognised guideline.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: 16 CFR 1500.42
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The method was in accordance with the 16 CFR 1500.42 and US CPSC requirements
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: albino ; not otherwise specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Recognised supplier.
- Age at study initiation: Young adults. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 grammes
- Concentration (if solution): neat (unchanged) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 days
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 4 days (observations were completed every day from day 1 to day 7 post treatment).
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 (sexes not specified)
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): No.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system. Reference 16 CFR 1500.42. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 24
- Remarks on result:
- other: n = 6; maximum category score = 4
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 24
- Remarks on result:
- other: n = 6; maximum category score = 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 12
- Remarks on result:
- other: n =6; maximum category score = 2
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 12
- Remarks on result:
- other: n =6 ; maximum category score = 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 18
- Remarks on result:
- other: n =6 ; maximum category score = 3; conjunctivae redness - maximum score = 0
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 18
- Remarks on result:
- other: n =6 ; maximum category score = 3
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 24
- Remarks on result:
- other: n =6 ; maximum category score = 4; chemosis - maximum score = 0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 7 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 24
- Remarks on result:
- other: n =6 ; maximum category score = 4; chemosis - maximum score = 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Following scoring at 24, 48 and 72 h: No positive corneal scores. No positive iridal scores. No positive conjunctivae redness mean scores. No positive chemosis mean scores. All scores for all effect categories were < 1 in all animals on all days (24 to 72hs; and up to 7 days). Discharge positive scores were also absent.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: US CPSC / US FDA
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study the test substance would not be considered as an eye irritant.
- Executive summary:
- The GLP study was completed under 16 CFR 1500.42 following a guideline similar to OECD 405, to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye following a single application in the albino rabbit. A mass of 0.1 grams of the test material was placed into one eye in each of 6 animals. The other eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment with observations daily up to 7 days. No corneal opacity or iritis, chemosis or conjunctival redness as observed at any time point up to 7 days in all animals. Under the conditions of this study the test material is not considered to be an eye irritant.
Reference
Individual scoring data was presented within the study report. No positive responses observed.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation:
The GLP study was completed under 16 CFR 1500.41 following a guideline similar to OECD 404, to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the skin of the albino rabbit. The test substance was evaluated in 6 albino rabbits. A dose of 0.5 ml test substance was applied to intact and abraded clipped dorsal skin site under a occlusive dressing for 24 hours. Skin observations were made 24 and 72 hours after patch removal. No edema or erythema responses were noted (Score = 0) at 24 or 72 hours in the intact and/or the abraded skin in all organisms. The test material produced a mean primary irritation index (PII) of 0.00 and is considered to be non-irritating to skin.
The mean score at 24 and 72h of intact skin was < 2.3 in all organisms in all response criteria (erythma/escar or edema) and any effects did not persist to the end of the observation period (72h). Since four or more organisms did not demonstrate a mean score greater than or equal to 2.3 ; there was an absence of reported significant dermal effects (e.g. alopecia, hyperplasia or scaling) and/or significant variability of responses, the substance is not considered to be irritating. The substance is not irritating to the skin. Further testing for skin irritation is unjustified.
Eye irritation/corrosion:
The GLP study was completed under 16 CFR 1500.42 following a guideline similar to OECD 405, to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye following a single application in the albino rabbit. A mass of 0.1 grams of the test material was placed into one eye in each of 6 animals. The other eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment with observations daily up to 7 days. No corneal opacity or iritis, chemosis or conjunctival redness as observed at any time point up to 7 days in all animals. Under the conditions of this study the test material is not considered to be an eye irritant. Based on the applicants evaluation and/or recalculation of the mean scores the test material is not considered to be irritating to the eye under Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 criteria due to a complete absence of Corneal Opacity and Corneal Iritis indicative of full reversibility within 21-days. Redness and Chemosis scores were also absent. There was additionally an absence of significant variation of responses.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
one in vivo GLP compliant Klimisch 1 study; applicant evaluated and/or recalculated the mean and individual scoring in concluding the endpoint where necessary.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
one in vivo GLP compliant Klimisch 1 study; applicant evaluated and/or recalculated the mean and individual scoring in concluding the endpoint where necessary.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The substance does not meet classification criteria under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 for dermal irritation.
The substance does not meet classification criteria under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 for eye irritation.
For skin irritation, the weight of evidence indicates that the substance has the potential to be slightly irritating however this is not sufficient for classification purposes. Available data indicates negative irritation in an in vivo dermal irritation study. This study utilised occlusive dressings (increases percutaneous absorption; potential altering of epidermal lipids, DNA synthesis, epidermal turnover, pH, epidermal morphology) resulting in a predisposition towards positive and irreversible irritation. This is absent however. The overall evidence by expert judgement indicates that the substance may produce transient and very slight to non-existent irritation by the dermal route which is not sufficient for classification in accordance with the above criteria.
For eye irritation, the weight of evidence indicates that the substance has the potential to cause transient very mild to non-existent irritating effects to the eye; which are insufficient for classification based on the applicants recalculation of the mean scoring and evaluation of the results in six organisms demonstrating that the EU criteria had not been met. Effects in vivo on corneal opacity and iritis are non-existent and conjunctival effects are additionally absent out to 7 days of observation; the overall evidence is indicative of transient and reversible effects on the eye.
References:
1. Guidance on Application of the CLP Criteria, ECHA, version 5.0 – June 2017.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.