Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-634-8 | CAS number: 7664-39-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- two-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1997
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Published FDA study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Testing the potential of sodium fluoride to affect spermatogenesis in the rat
- Author:
- Sprando RL, Collins TFX, Black TN, Rorie J, Ames MJ & O'Donnell M
- Year:
- 1 997
- Bibliographic source:
- Food and Chemical Toxicology 35: 881-890
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 416 (Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study design is comparable to a standard two-generation reprodcutive toxicity study, however this paper focuses on investigations of the effects on spermatogenesis in male rats following administration over two generations. Additional findings are reported in other papers by the same authors.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 7681-94-4
- IUPAC Name:
- 7681-94-4
- Reference substance name:
- Sodium fluoride
- EC Number:
- 231-667-8
- EC Name:
- Sodium fluoride
- Cas Number:
- 7681-49-4
- Molecular formula:
- NaF
- IUPAC Name:
- sodium fluoride
- Details on test material:
- Sodium fluoride (CAS 7681-94-4), obtained from Sigma Chemical Co., MO, USA, Lot no. 109F0102. No trace element impurities were detected in the sample. Sodium fluoride (NaF) was the test substance, and the authors were specifically looking at the effects of fluoride. The test substance readily dissociates in aqueous conditions producing fluoride ions. A read across is therefore proposed for hydrogen fluoride as the effects of the fluoride ion in the body will be the same.
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Crj: CD(SD)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- The rats were male and female Charles River CD VAF+ (Sprague-Dawley) rats, aged 22 days on arrival and quarantined for approximately 1 week. Individuals were identified by ear tags. Rats were housed under standard controlled temperature (67-74oF), humidity (40-70%) and light (12 hour light:dark cycle). Rats were fed a low fluoride NIH-07 diet (7.95ppm fluoride). The diet was prepared by Ziegler Bros, Inc. and is the same formulation used in the NTP study (1990).
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: drinking water
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- Sodium fluoride was dissolved in the rats drinking water, which was provided ad libitum. The water was obtained by filtering house-distilled water through a water purification system. The fluoride concentation in this water was determiined to be less than 0.2 ppm.
- Details on mating procedure:
- Mating took place over a 3 week period. Pregnancy was determined by the presence of sperm plugs in the cage and the presence of sperm in the vagina.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Sodium fluoride concentrations for both the control and treated groups were performed at the FDA by potentiometric titration of the fluoride ion with a fluoride ion electrode. Sodium fluoride concentrations for both control and treated groups were determined using an EA 940 pH/ISE meter with appropriate electrodes and filling solutions for fluoride analysis. Sodium fluoride concentrations were determined each time dosing solutions were prepared for any treatment group including the control.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Approximately 14 weeks per generation
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Details on study schedule:
- The parental (P) generation received sodium fluoride in their drinking water (provided ad libitum) for approximately 14 weeks; 10 weeks pretreatment, 3 weeks mating (to non-siblings), and 1 week post-mating. Pregnant P females continued to be exposed from gestation day 0 until the end of lactation. On post-partum day 4, litters were culled to 10 pups per litter (5 males and 5 females) where possible using a random number table. At day 21, males were randomly selected to represent the F1 generation from as many litters as possible. The weanlings remained in the same treatment group as their parents and were exposed to sodium fluoride for approximately 14 weeks.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 25, 100, 175 or 250ppm
Basis:
nominal in water
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- P generation total: 64 male rats (0ppm n=12, 25ppm n=13, 100ppm n=13, 175ppm n=12, 250ppm n=14); F1 generation total: 60 male rats (12 rats per dose). The same numbers of female rats were used, but no examinations were performed on these rats.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- P generation rats were assigned to treatment groups by weight using a random experimental stratified procedure. On post-partum day 4, F1 litters were culled to 10 pups per litter (5 males and 5 females) where possible using a random number table. At day 21, males were randomly selected to represent the F1 generation from as many litters as possible.
- Positive control:
- Not examined
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- After 1 week of post mating NaF treatment, testicular tissues were collected. Body weights were recorded at the time of tissue collection.
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Not examined.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- The left testis was homogenised and the number of homogenisation-resistant spermatids per testis determined. Spermatid numbers were expressed as either numbers of homogenisation-resistant spermatids per testis, spermatids per testis, spermatid numbers per gram of testis, or spermatid numbers per gram of testis per day.
- Litter observations:
- No information.
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- The right testis was perfusion fixed whilst the rat was anaesthetised (after removal of the left testis), see below for method. Testicular histopathology was assessed in the control and high dose groups. 10 sections were evaluated per animal per group. Seminiferous tubules were examined to determine the effects of fluoride on Sertoli cells, germ cells undergoing spermiogenesis, and spermatocytogenesis or meiosis. The boundary tissue of the seminiferous tubules was examined for signs of infolding. The intertubular space was examined to determine whether Leydig cells were affected, whether cells not normally found in the interstitial space were present, and if there was an increase in cells normally found in low numbers.
Blood collected from each animal's right ventricle (under anaesthesia) was allowed to clot at room temperature for approximately 1 hour. The blood was assayed for levels of LH, FSH and serum testosterone.
The epididymides, heart, spleen, liver, kidneys, adrenals, and seminal vesicles/prostates were weighed. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- Examinations in the F1 males were identical to those in the P males.
- Statistics:
- Two-way ANOVA was performed for all response variables. ANCOVA was used for organ weights with body weight as the covariate. One-way ANOVA was used to check for differences at dose levels, followed by an LSD t-test. P values equal to or below 0.05 were considered significant.
- Reproductive indices:
- Not examined.
- Offspring viability indices:
- Not examined.
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- not examined
Effect levels (P0)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 ppm (nominal)
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Spermatogenesis and endocrine function
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- not examined
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Gross pathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
Details on results (F1)
In addition to the above; liver weights on the 100 and 250ppm groups were significantly lower than controls. This was considered a random occurrence by the authors because no dose-related effects were observed.
Effect levels (F1)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 250 ppm (nominal)
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Spermatogenesis and endocrine function
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
The mean body weights of the P and F1 generations from all sodium fluoride treated groups were not statistically different from their respective controls. F1 generation male body weights were higher than those of the P generation, but not significanly different.
There were no dose related effects on testis weight. There were no significant differences in mean testis weights between treated groups and controls in either generation. The right testis weight and the paired testis weights from the F1 generation controls were significantly higher than the P generation controls. The left testis weight of the F1 generation males was significantly lower than that of the P generation males in the 25ppm group. The right testis weight of the F1 generation males was significantly higher than that of the P generation males in the 100ppm group. Statistically significant differences in mean epididymal weights were not observed between control and treatment groups of the P generation. Within the F1 generation the right epididymal weight of the 175ppm group was significantly lower than the F1 control. No dose-related effects were observed. The weight of the right epididymis from the F1 generation was significantly lower than that of the P group when epididymal weights for the 175ppm group were compared. Prostate/seminal vesicle weights were not significantly different between treated and control rats in either generation.
There were no significant differences in spermatid numbers between controls and treated rats in either generation, or between generations. There were no significant differences in serum testosterone, LH and FSH concentrations between treated and control rats in either generation or between generations. Liver weight in the 250ppm group (P generation) was significantly lower than the control group. Spleen weights in the 175 and 250ppm groups were significantly higher than the control group. The authors considered these events to be random and not treatment related because no toxic effects were observed. Adrenal weights in the F1 generation were significantly lower than adrenal weights in the P generation at all dose levels. No dose-related toxic effects were observed and the authors report that weight differences can arise from the removal procedure. There were no treatment related effects on the histopathology of the testis; the histological appearance of the testicular tissue from the control group was indistinguishable from that of the high dose group in both generations. There were no differences between the generations in the high dose groups.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Prolonged exposure to sodium fluoride in drinking water did not adversely affect spermatogenesis or endocrine function in two generations of male rats.
- Executive summary:
The potential of sodium fluoride (NaF) to affect spermatogenesis and endocrine function was assessed in P and F1 generation male rats. Male and female rats received sodium fluoride in their drinking water at 0, 25, 100, 175 or 250 ppm. P generation rats were exposed for 10 weeks, then for 3 weeks during mating. Reproductive tissues were collected from P males 1 week after mating (after approximately 14 weeks of NaF treatment). Pregnant females (P) were exposed to NaF during gestation and lactation. F1 weanling males were exposed to NaF for 14 weeks, at which time reproductive tissues were collected. Dose-related effects were not observed within the P and F1 treatment groups in testis weights, prostate/seminal vesicle weights, non-reproductive organ weights, testicular spermatid counts, sperm production per gram of testis per day, sperm production per gram of testis, LH, FSH or serum testosterone concentrations. Histopathological changes in testicular tissues were not observed. Prolonged exposure to NaF in drinking water up to a dose of 250 ppm does not adversely affect spermatogenesis or endocrine function in P and F1 generation male rats.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.