Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Principles of method if other than guideline:
500 mg of phthalimide moistened was applied to the skin (inside ear) of two rabbits for 24 hours. Animals were observed for 7 days
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 3-4 kg
- Housing: the animals were housed individually

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
other: no treatment, inside ear
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
amount: 500 mg
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hour(s)
Observation period:
7 days
Number of animals:
2
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
Fixation of the test substance was performed using adhesive bandage on the ear of the rabbit

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): after the exposure the test substance was washed away with water and soap/vegetable oil
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours


Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 0, 24, 48 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 0, 24, 48 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 0, 24, 48 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 0,24, 48 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No irritation was observed at any time point.
Other effects:
no data
Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Executive summary:

Thyssen/Bayer AG (1979):

In a primary dermal irritation study, the skin irritation/corrosion potential of phthalimide was tested. 500 mg/animal of the test substance was applied to the inside of rabbit ear of 2 animals, for 24 hours and animals were observed for 7 days. Phathalimide resulted to be not irritating, as no edema and no erythema were seen at any time point.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The eye irritation potential of phthalimide was evaluated by placing 50 mg of test substance in conjunctival sac of one male and one female white New Zealand rabbit. Animals were observed at 0, 24 hours, 2, 3 and 7 days.
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
white New Zealand rabbits, weight 3 to 4 kg
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
amount: 50 mg
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single eye instillation
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2
Details on study design:
Compound was placed in the conjunctival sac of one male and one female white New Zealand rabbit. The eyes were not washed and animals were observed at 0, 24 hours, 2, 3 and 7 days.

SCORE SYSTEM: Draize
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 0, 24 h, 48 h, 7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 0, 24 h, 48 h, 7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 0, 24 h, 48 h, 7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 0, 24 h, 48 h, 7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 0, 24 h, 48 h, 7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 0, 24 h, 48 h, 7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 0, 24 h, 48 h, 7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 0, 24 h, 48 h, 7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No irritation (score =0) was observed at any timepoint
Other effects:
no data
Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Executive summary:

Thyssen/Bayer AG (1979):

In an acute eye irritation study, 50 mg of phthalimide (purity not stated) was placed in the conjunctival sac of two rabbits. Animals were observed for 7 days. Irritation was scored according to the method of Draize. No eye irritation was observed at any time point.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification