Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,3-dichlorobenzoic acid
EC Number:
200-039-5
EC Name:
2,3-dichlorobenzoic acid
Cas Number:
50-45-3
Molecular formula:
C7H4Cl2O2
IUPAC Name:
2,3-dichlorobenzoic acid
Test material form:
solid: crystalline
Details on test material:
Test item: 2,3-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID (CAS No.: 50-45-3)
Batch No.: L2A134N
Physical state: Solid, crystalline powder
Colour: White
Active ingredient content (titrimetry): 100.4%
Water content: 0.03 % (m/m)
Storage: 15-30°C, protected from moisture

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Species and strain: CBA/Ca mice
Source: TOXI-COOP ZRT.
Hygienic level at arrival: SPF
Hygienic level during the study: Good conventional
Number of animals: 28 animals/main test (4 animals/treatment group)
Sex: Female, nulliparous, non pregnant
Age of animals: Young adult mice; 11-12 weeks old (at start of the main test)
Body weight range at starting: 17.0-22.0 g
Acclimatization time: 7 days
Animal health: Only healthy animals were used

Housing during acclimatization period: Grouped caging in small groups
Housing during the test: Grouped caging (4 animals/cage)
Light: 12 hours daily, from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.
Temperature: 22 ± 3 °C
Relative humidity: 30 – 70 %

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Remarks:
AOO (acetone:olive oil 4:1) for positive control groups
Concentration:
The test item was administered at four different concentrations (50; 25; 10; 5 w/v%) according to the results of the dose range finding test.
No. of animals per dose:
4 animal/dose
Details on study design:
Selection of test item concentrations was based on the results of a formulation evaluation and also results of preliminary irritation/toxicity test to find the best solvent and the maximum applicable concentration according to the relevant guidelines. The test item was tested at the solubility limit of 50 % and at three lower concentrations (25 %, 10 % and 5 %) in N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF). Appropriate positive control (α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde [HCA] in 25 % concentration), furthermore two negative control groups dosed with the vehicles of the test and positive control groups, respectively, were employed. The positive control item (25 % HCA in Acetone: Olive oil 4:1 mixture, AOO) induced the appropriate stimulation over the control, thus confirming the validity of the assay.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The positive control group animals were treated with 25 % (w/v) HCA solution (dissolved in AOO) concurrent to the test item groups. No mortality, cutaneous reactions or signs of toxicity were observed in the positive control group.
Significant lymphoproliferative response (SI ≥ 3) was noted for HCA (SI = 8.1). The results of the positive control item demonstrated appropriate performance of the test in accordance with the relevant guidelines and confirmed validity of the assay.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.7
Variability:
2,3-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID 50% in DMF
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.9
Variability:
2,3-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID 25% in DMF
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.9
Variability:
2,3-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID 10 % in DMF
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.7
Variability:
2,3-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID 5% in DMF

Any other information on results incl. tables

 Test Group

Name

Measured

DPM/group

Group* DPM 

DPN

(DPM/Node)

 Stimulation

IndexValues

Vehicle control for the positive control:

AOO

17750

17710.5

2213.8

1.0

Positive control:

25% HCA in AOO 

144132

144092.5

18011.6

8.1

 2,3-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID

50% in DMF

4734

4694.5

586.8

0.7

 2,3-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID

25% in DMF

6703

6663.5

832.9

0.9

 2,3-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID

10 % in DMF

13746

13706.5

1713.3

1.9

 2,3-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID

5% in DMF

12192

12152.5

1519.1

1.7

 Vehicle control :for the test item:

DMF

7226

7186.5

898.3

1.0

*Group DPM = measured DPM(group)- average DPM(background)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the present Local Lymph Node Assay, 2,3-DICHLOROBENZOIC ACID (CAS No. 50-45-3) tested at the maximum attainable concentration of 50 % (w/v, based on solubility) and at concentrations of 25 %, 10% and 5% as formulations in an appropriate vehicle (DMF) was shown to have no sensitization potential.