Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1992
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP and OECD testing guideline compliant study with well characterized test material

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1993
Report date:
1993

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
tert-(dodecyl/tetradecyl)-ammonium bis(3-(4-((5-(1,1-dimethyl-propyl)-2-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)azo)-3-methyl-5-hydroxy-(1H)pyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulfonamidato)chromate
EC Number:
413-210-6
EC Name:
tert-(dodecyl/tetradecyl)-ammonium bis(3-(4-((5-(1,1-dimethyl-propyl)-2-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)azo)-3-methyl-5-hydroxy-(1H)pyrazol-1-yl)benzenesulfonamidato)chromate
Cas Number:
192662-33-2
Molecular formula:
UVCB substance
IUPAC Name:
chromium(3+) 2-methyltridecan-2-aminium bis(4-{2-[5-(2,2-dimethylpropyl)-3-nitro-2-oxidophenyl]diazen-1-yl}-3-methyl-1-(3-sulfamoylphenyl)-1H-pyrazol-5-olate)
Details on test material:
- Substance type: pigment, powder
- Physical state: solid
- Purity test date: no data
- Lot/batch No.: Misch.PA1+3/91
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: January 1997
- Stability under test conditions: yes
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Pirbright White
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: CIBA-GEIGY Limited, Animal Production, Stein, Switzerland
- Age at study initiation:
- Weight at study initiation: 321 to 408 g.
- Housing: 1 animals per cage
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22±2°C
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1992-12-14 To: 1993-01-14

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
other: 20 % Propylen-glycol for intradermal injection and vaseline for epicutaneous application
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal injections:
- 5% in 20 % propylene glycol (w/v)
- 5% in the adjuvant/saline mixture (w/v)

Epidermal applications
50% in vaseline (induction)
20% (challenge) (30% and 50% in vaseline caused erythema in the range-finder study)
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, semiocclusive
Vehicle:
other: 20 % Propylen-glycol for intradermal injection and vaseline for epicutaneous application
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal injections:
- 5% in 20 % propylene glycol (w/v)
- 5% in the adjuvant/saline mixture (w/v)

Epidermal applications
50% in vaseline (induction)
20% (challenge) (30% and 50% in vaseline caused erythema in the range-finder study)
No. of animals per dose:
20 (test item)
10 (control)
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Exposure period: 48h (epidermal eposure)
- Test groups: yes
- Control group: yes
- Site: neck
- Frequency of applications: once per week
- Duration: 4 weeks
- Concentrations: see above

During weeks 3 and 4 no treatments were performed.

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures:1
- Day(s) of challenge: 1
- Exposure period: 24h
- Test groups: yes
- Control group: yes
- Site: flank
- Concentrations: 20%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48h

OTHER:
Three pairs of intradermal injections (0.1 ml per injection) were made simultaneously into the shaved neck of the guinea
pigs as follows:
- adjuvant/saline mixture 1:1 (v/v)
- test article in 20 % propylene glycol in water (w/v)
- test article in the adjuvant/saline mixture (w/v)
Challenge controls:
vehicle (vaseline)
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
Potassium dichromate

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
A sensitization rate of 90% was observed in the experimental animals after the challenge with 1% (w/w) potassium dichromate in vaseline.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
19
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 20% . No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 19.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
19
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 20%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 19.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

On experimental day 17 female guinea pig No. 53 was found dead. Macro pathological investigation did not reveal any changes. Since no clinical signs were observed in all other treated guinea pigs and with respect to the low incidence of this finding, no toxicological

relevance is attributed to this death.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information