Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information
This reverse mutation assay was performed in 1991 in accordance with OECD-guidelines without GLP. Five Salm. typh. strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA100) were tested with and without metabolic activation. No detectable mutagenic activity was found.
Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
7 January - 4 February 1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-compliant guideline study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: The strains were obtained from Professor B.N. Ames, University of California, California, USA
- Properly maintained: yes
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
DNA polymerase A deficient
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-liver fractions of rats treated with Aroclor 1254
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pretest: 2,5, 5, 25, 50, 250, 500, 2500, 5000 ug/ml & solvent control
- Main test: 50, 158, 500, 1580, 5000 ug/ml & solvent control
Vehicle / solvent:
A solution of P5098 was prepared in distilled water at 25 mg/ml
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
benzo(a)pyrene
other: 2-Aminoanthracene
Evaluation criteria:
No data
Statistics:
No data
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
The negative controls, positive controls, and sterility controls all fulfilled requirements for determination of a valid test.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation

The test material, P5098, was devoid of mutagenic activity under the conditions of test.
Executive summary:

This reverse mutation assay was performed in 1991 in accordance with OECD-guidelines without GLP. Five Salm. typh. strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA100) were tested with and without metabolic activation. Test concentrations ranged from 50 ug/plate up to 5000 ug/plate.

No detectable mutagenic activity was found for the test article when the Salmonella/microsomal assay was performed.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the data available the substance is not classified or labeled according to Directive 67/548/EEC (DSD) or Regulation 1272/2008/EC (CLP).