Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 412-640-1 | CAS number: 84632-50-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1992-06-24 to 1992-12-09
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP compliant Guideline study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted Sept. 19, 1984
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- When this study was performed, the LLNA did not yet exist.
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Analytical purity: 99%
- Appearance: orange powder - Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: D. Hall, Newchurch, Staffordshire, England
- Age at study initiation: approximately six to seven weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 295 to 342 g
- Housing: in groups of ten in suspended metal cages with wire mesh floors
- Diet: vitamin C enriched guinea-pig diet FDl ad libitum
- Water: drinking water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 13 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: approximately 21°C
- Humidity: 30-70%
- Air changes: approximately 15 per hour
- Photoperiod: 12 hours artificial light (0700 - 1900 hours) in each 24-hour period
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1992-09-16 To: 1992-10-18 - Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- Induction intradermal injection - 5% w/w in water (maximum practical concentration that could be prepared and dosed intradermally)
Induction topical application - 50% w/w in distilled water
Topical challenge - 50 and 25% w/w in distilled water
From preliminary investigations: 50% w/w in distilled water was the maximum practical concentration and did not give rise to irritating effects. - Route:
- epicutaneous, semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- Induction intradermal injection - 5% w/w in water (maximum practical concentration that could be prepared and dosed intradermally)
Induction topical application - 50% w/w in distilled water
Topical challenge - 50 and 25% w/w in distilled water
From preliminary investigations: 50% w/w in distilled water was the maximum practical concentration and did not give rise to irritating effects. - No. of animals per dose:
- 20 females
- Details on study design:
- A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- intradermal (test animals): three pairs of injections (0.1 mL each) on day 0
1st: FCA 50 : 50 with water for irrigation (Ph. Eur.)
2nd: test item, 5% w/w in water for irrigation.
3rd: test item, 5% w/w in a 50 : 50 mixture of water for irrigation and FCA
- control animals received the same treatment, except test item
- topical: following clipping, 0.2 mL per site of 10% w/w sodium lauryl sulfate was spread over the intradermal injection sites on day 6. On day 7, test item or deionized water was applied to the test item or control groups respectively.
- Exposure period, topical: 48 hours
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: once
- Day of challenge: two weeks after the topical induction application
- Exposure period: approximately 24 hours
- Test groups: one test group
- Concentrations: 50% w/w in distilled water and applied to an anterior site on the flank, 25% w/w in distilled water applied in a similar
manner to a posterior site.
- Control group: treated as test item group
- Evaluation: approximately 24, 48 and 72 hours following patch removal - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- periodical reliability check (formalin)
- Positive control results:
- The positive control caused the expected skin reactions, thus, demonstrating the sensitivity of the test system.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50% and 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50% and 25%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50% and 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50% and 25%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- other:
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50% and 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: other:. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50% and 25%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 50% and 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50% and 25%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 50% and 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50% and 25%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Reading:
- other:
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 50% and 25%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: other:. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50% and 25%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
Procedure and results
To evaluate the allergic potential of the substance, a skin maximisation test in guinea-pig was perfomed. Ten test and tencontrol guinea-pigs were used in this study. For induction the animals were treated intradermally (5%). 6 days later, topical induction (50%) in the same area was performed after treatment with sodium lauryl sulphate in petrolatum. Control and test animals were challenged topically two weeks after the topical induction application using the test substance, 25 and 50% w/v in distilled water.
No skin reactions or signs of toxicity were recorded. There were no dermal reactions seen in any of the test animals.
Discussion
The test substance did not induce any dermal reactions in test animals. Thus, the test substance is considered to be a non-sensitizer.
Migrated from Short description of key information:
To evaluate the allergic potential of the test substance, a skin maximisation test (EU B.6, GLP) in guinea-pig was perfomed. The test item did not induce any dermal reactions in test animals. Thus, the test substance is considered to be a non-sensitizer.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for skin sensitization under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.