Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

The available data set contains in vitro(Table 1) and in vivo (Table 2) genotoxicity studies. Basically in vitro studies showed no mutagenic effects in Ames tests and in UDS test (read-across with THPS) but clastogenic effects in Mouse Lymphoma, Sister Chromatide Exchange and chromosome aberration assay. These effects on nucleus material (clastogenic only) were observed in in vitro systems and were not confirmed by in vivo assays. In addition, no carcinogenic effects were detected in two 2-year studies in rats and mice (NTP, 1987). Therefore, it is concluded that any potential for mutagenicity is not expressed in vivo, and THPC is not considered a genotoxic substance.

 

Note: Information from THPS is judged relevant because as an ionic salt, THPC is completely dissociated into THP+ and Cl- in aqueous solutions and the equivalent is true for most of the THP+ salts, including sulphate salt. As a consequence hazard properties evaluated in aqueous solution could reasonably be predicted using data from the equivalent sulphate salt. Therefore a read-across approach could be done for certain hazard properties between THPC (chloride salt) and THPS (sulphate salt).

 

Table 1: In vitrogenotoxicity

Test system

Reference

Result

Reliability

Ames test

NTP (1987), Zeigeret al. (1987)

Negative

2

Ames test

MacGregoret al.(1980)

Negative

3

Ames test

Kawachi et al.(1980)

Negative

4

Ames test

Ishidae et al.(1981)

Negative

4

Ames test like (Bacillus subtilis)

Kawachi et al.(1980)

Positive

4

Mouse Lymphoma Assay

NTP (1987), Myhr et al.(1990)

Positive

2

Sister Chromatide Exchange

NTP (1987), Loveday et al.(1989)

Positive

2

Chromosome Aberration

NTP (1987), Loveday et al.(1989)

Positive

2

Chromosome Aberration

Ishidae et al. (1981)

Positive

4

Chromatide breaks

Sasaki et al. (1980)

Positive

3

Unscheduled DNA Synthesis (read across with THPS)

 Downey et al. (1990)

Negative

 

 

Table 2:In vivogenotoxicity

Test system

Reference

Result

Reliability

Micronucleus

NTP (1995)

Negative

2

Micronucleus

Kawachi et al.(1980)

Ambigous

4

 

 


Short description of key information:
THPC effects on nucleus material (clastogenic only) were observed in in vitro systems and were not confirmed neither in in vivo assays nor in two carcinogenicity sutides in rats and mice (2-year oral administration). Therefore THPC is not considered a genotoxic substance.

Endpoint Conclusion:

Justification for classification or non-classification

According to in vivo data and carcinogenicity studies THPC should not be classified for germ cell mutagenicity properties.