Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Administrative data

Endpoint:
long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
July 24, 2013 - February 13, 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
Version / remarks:
2012
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(trans,trans)-5-{(4-Propyl[1,1-bicyclohexyl]-4-yl)-difluormethoxy}-1,2,3-trifluorbenzene
EC Number:
606-647-0
Cas Number:
208338-50-5
Molecular formula:
C₂₂H₂₉F₅O
IUPAC Name:
(trans,trans)-5-{(4-Propyl[1,1-bicyclohexyl]-4-yl)-difluormethoxy}-1,2,3-trifluorbenzene

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
no
Details on sampling:
No anaytical monitoring was performed during the test period, because the test item has a very low water solubilty and is therefore not quantifiable in the tested staurated solution in sufficient manner, even with enrichment of the samples. The water solubility of the test item was estimated by calculation with EPISuite develoed by EPA to be < 0.13 µg/L. The limit of quantification (LOQs) of the used HPLC-DAD system was set to be 2 mg/L and is obviously much higher than the estimated water solubility. Even an enrichment of the samples by factor 1000 is not sufficient enough so that the test item cannot be determimed above the LOQs. Higher enrichment factors are actually not practicable because of the high volumes of the saturated solution needed for enrichment. Therefore, a HPLC standard method with a sufficient sensivity and accuracy could not be established.

Test solutions

Vehicle:
yes
Remarks:
Elendt M4, according too ELENDT (1990), modified to a total hardness of 160 to 180 mg CaCO3/L
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: A saturated solution (100 mg/L) was prepared with dilution water one day before start of each exposure interval at every water renewal. The test item (100 mg/L) was transferred with an appropriate amount of the dilution water into brown glass flask and shaken overhead with 20 rpm for 24 hours at room temperature. Undissolved test item was removed by filtration with a membrane filter (0.45 µm, RC, Machery-Nagel).
- Vehicle: Elendt M4, according too ELENDT (1990), modified to a total hardness of 160 to 180 mg CaCO3/L

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Daphnia magna
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Daphnia magna
- Strain/clone: Daphnia magna Straus (Clone 5)
- Source: lnstitut für Wasser-, Boden- und Lufthygiene (WaBolu)
- Breeder: DR.U. NOACK-LABORATORIEN, Käthe-Paulus-Str. 1, 31157 Sarstedt, Germany
- Feeding during test: Daily feeding per test vessel with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (0.165 - 0.219 mL) and Desmodesmus subspicatus (0.228 - 0.922 mL) suspension was provided as food corresponding to 0.2 mg C per Daphnia and day.

ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: At least 2h in dilution water
- Acclimation conditions: same as test
- Type and amount of food: At least 5 times per week ad libitum with a mix of unicellular green algae, e.g. Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Desmodesmus subspicatus, with an algae cell density of > 10^6 cells/mL

Study design

Test type:
semi-static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
yes
Total exposure duration:
21 d

Test conditions

Hardness:
157 - 189 mg/L CaCO3
Test temperature:
20.6 - 22.0°C
pH:
7.59 - 8.59
Dissolved oxygen:
5.12 - 9.45 mg/L
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal concentration: 100 mg/L
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Glass beakers 100 mL capacity
- Volume of test medium: 50 mL
- Type : open
- Renewal rate of test solution: renewal 3 times per week, i.e. after 48 and 72 hours
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 10
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 10

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Culture medium Elendt M4, according to ELENDT ( 1990), modified to a total hardness of 160 to 180 mg CaC03/L
- Culture medium different from test medium: no
- Intervals of water quality measurement: once within 7 days

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 16/8h light/dark cycle
- Light intensity: Max. 20 µE m-2 s-1

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study: A non GLP preliminary range finding test was carried out at the test facility as acute immobilisation test to Daphnia magna STRAUS. A limit loading rate of 100 mg/L of the test item Art. 274554 (CCQU-3-F) was tested under static conditions over a period of 48 h and no immobilisation was seen.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
A reference test was conducted as an acute immobilisation test (acc. to DIN 38412 L11 and AQS P 9/2) under static conditions with a test duration of 24h once per month.

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Key result
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
NOELR
Effect conc.:
100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Key result
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
NOELR
Effect conc.:
100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Details on results:
No anaytical monitoring was performed during the test period, because the test item has a very low water solubilty and is therefore not quantifiable in the tested staurated solution in sufficient manner, even with enrichment of the samples. The water solubility of the test item was estimated by calculation with EPISuite develoed by EPA to be < 0.13 µg/L. The limit of quantification (LOQs) of the used HPLC-DAD system was set to be 2 mg/L and is obviously much higher than the estimated water solubility. Even an enrichment of the samples by factor 1000 is not sufficient enough so that the test item cannot be determimed above the LOQs. Higher enrichment factors are actually not practicable because of the high volumes of the saturated solution needed for enrichment. Therefore, a HPLC standard method with a sufficient sensivity and accuracy could not be established.

The average values of living juveniles per parental daphnid were 81 for the control and 80 for the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L after 21 days. The reproductive output of daphnids at the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L was comparable to the reproductive output of daphnids in the control (t-test, p = 0.05).

The coefficient of varation of the number of living offspring produced per parent was 10% for the control and 6% for the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L. Generally in a well-run test, the coefficient of varation around the mean number of living offspring per parent animal should be <= 25%.

The intrinsic rates of natural increase (IR) of the surviving parental daphnids accounting for generation time and number of offspring were used for calculation of population growth and maintenance.

No adult mortality was observed during the test period of 21 days. In the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L and in the control, all parental daphnids survived until the end of the test after 21 days.

The first brood was released between days 8 and 9 by all parental daphnids of the control and the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L. Four broods were produced by all parental daphnids in the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L and the control.

The mean dry body weight and total body length of all parental daphnids of the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L and the control were determined at the end of the study. The mean dry body weight of the parental daphnids was 0.82 mg per daphnid for the control and 0.70 mg per daphnid for the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L. The mean body length of the parental daphnids was 4.98 per daphnid for the control and 5.13 mm per daphnid for the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L.

No stillborn juveniles or aborted eggs were observed in the control and only 2 aborted eggs in the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L during the exposure period of 21 days. Related to the total number of produced juveniles (dead + alive) the percentage of dead juveniles and aborted eggs was < 1 % at the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L

No males or ephippia (winter eggs) were observed in the control or in the nominal loading level of 100 mg/L.

Water quality parameters (i.e. pH-value, dissolved oxygen concentration, total water hardness and temperature) were within the acceptable limits.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
The EC50 of the reference item potassium dichromate was 1.68 mg/L (95% confidence limits: 1.65 - 1.70 mg/L) after 24 hours and therefore within the prescribed concentration range of 0.6 - 2.4 mg/L of quality criteria according to AQS P 9/2 (02/2000) for daphnids clone 5 cultured in Elendt M4 medium. The EC50-value of the reference item is also within the recommended rangeof 0.6 - 2.1 mg/L according to OECD-Guideline 202.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
No significant effects on the reproductive output or adult mortality were observed in this study. The No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) after 21 days was assessed at 100 mg/L.
Executive summary:

This study was performed according to GLP and the methods applied are fully compliant with OECD TG 211. In this study semi-static conditions have been applied. No anaytical monitoring was performed during the test period, because the test item has a very low water solubilty and is therefore not quantifiable in the tested staurated solution in sufficient manner, even with enrichment of the samples. The water solubility of the test item was estimated by calculation with EPISuite develoed by EPA to be < 0.13 µg/L. The limit of quantification (LOQs) of the used HPLC-DAD system was set to be 2 mg/L and is obviously much higher than the estimated water solubility. Even an enrichment of the samples by factor 1000 is not sufficient enough so that the test item cannot be determimed above the LOQs. Higher enrichment factors are actually not practicable because of the high volumes of the saturated solution needed for enrichment. Therefore, a HPLC standard method with a sufficient sensivity and accuracy could not be established.

No significant effects on the reproductive output or adult mortality were observed in this study. The No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) after 21 days was assessed at 100 mg/L.